Sentences with phrase «only cause of climate change»

The claim has never been the only cause of climate change is human intervention, so why do you allude that is the case?

Since the history of the eventual forming of the IPCC indicates that the requested science was not used by the IPCC to conclude that humans are the only cause of any climate change — that the science of climate change was agreed to show such and only such — that this in its self is sufficient to mistrust climate science by anyone's logic?

The only reason Trenberth is advocating a change is political and the only cause of climate change for which he wants to change the rules is man.

The only causes of climate change in the Holocene are orbital eccentricities and anthropogenic carbon dioxide.

Not exact matches

But the mayor cautioned that the only way cities like Syracuse will be able to fix the larger problem of leaking water pipes is if Congress provides financial aid while tackling a root cause of the problem — climate change.

A Washington Post-Stanford University poll in June found 77 percent of Americans say rising global temperatures are at least partly the result of human activity, while 22 percent said that climate change is the result only of natural causes.

Only 10.4 percent of participants agreed with the statement, «climate change is occurring and it is caused mostly by human activities.»

«There is a certain ironic satisfaction in seeing a study funded by the Koch Brothers — the greatest funders of climate change denial and disinformation on the planet — demonstrate what scientists have known with some degree of confidence for nearly two decades: that the globe is indeed warming, and that this warming can only be explained by human - caused increases in greenhouse gas concentrations,» he wrote.

Only one thing is certain - if it is found that manmade pollution is not the major cause of climate change the environmental movement will be utterly discredited.

The researchers note that while it's accurate that agreement isn't unanimous, only about 3 percent of climate scientists disagree about the causes of climate change.

People only consistently gave more when we encouraged them to think about the collective causes of climate change.»

However, carbon dioxide fertilization isn't the only cause of increased plant growth — nitrogen, land cover change and climate change by way of global temperature, precipitation and sunlight changes all contribute to the greening effect.

«Overall, climate change is projected to have substantial adverse impacts on future mortality, even considering only a subset of the expected health effects,» the agency said in its latest «Quantitative Risk Assessment of the Effects of Climate Change on Selected Causes of Death.climate change is projected to have substantial adverse impacts on future mortality, even considering only a subset of the expected health effects,» the agency said in its latest «Quantitative Risk Assessment of the Effects of Climate Change on Selected Causes of Death.&change is projected to have substantial adverse impacts on future mortality, even considering only a subset of the expected health effects,» the agency said in its latest «Quantitative Risk Assessment of the Effects of Climate Change on Selected Causes of Death.Climate Change on Selected Causes of Death.&Change on Selected Causes of Death.»

The damage caused by this round of bleaching will be felt for decades, but it's not the only reef around the globe to feel the heat of climate change.

Michael Mann added that «Donald Trump and his campaign still firmly reject the scientific evidence that climate change is human - caused, opposing the only action (a reduction of fossil fuel burning) that can save us from ever - more dangerous climate change impacts,» according to EcoWatch.

Local officials claim this is proof that the government's environmental preservation efforts have been successful, but recent research by climate scientists suggests a more worrying explanation for rising water levels: not only is climate change thought to be responsible for increased rainfall and snowfall in the area, it has also caused, by some estimates, up to a fifth of the permafrost which covers 80 % of the plateau to melt.

It's set in a near future where overpopulation and global climate change has been catastrophic for the food supply and the culture has become hostile to science, as if it's the cause of the problems rather than the only hope to solve them.

Only a shared perception of environmental catastrophe caused by climate change might change that reality.

With more and more credible, influential scientific minds concluding that climate change is not a significant issue and that man is not the cause of the temperature fluctuations that occur, it is only left wing ideology that inspires this kind of legislative foolishness.

I've been criticized by some environmentalists in recent years for writing that the long - term picture (more CO2 = warmer world = less ice = higher seas and lots of climatic and ecological changes) is the only aspect of human - caused global warming that is solidly established, and that efforts to link dramatic weather - related events to the human influence on climate could backfire should nature wiggle the other way for awhile.

We have only begun to see the change in temperature and climate caused by the amount of CO2 that we have already added to the atmosphere (+38 %), and it will continue to change until the ocean - atmosphere climate system fully responds to that addition.

I said all of this to only request the team to consider addressing more «cause and effect» articles in relation to climate change.

This leaves the solar cycle the only known cause of climate change on large scale, up to modern times where there is a documented antropogenic contribution.

Their mandate is limited to determining only «human causes of climate change».

Machinations involved in the establishment of the UN agency include the restrictions created by the definition of climate change to «only those changes caused by humans» and the bureaucratic structure designed to prove that human CO2 was the problem.

Of those that stated a position, 97.1 percent favored human caused climate change, while only 2 percent (87 papers) actually disputed human - caused climate change.

Do you think (not only you, but almost all scientists of the world), you can come up with some results that you might be hidden in your team combinatorics which have no true foundation in nature, nor do you know what causes climate change and all other phenomena on the planet.

Strong used the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) and the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) to create the IPCC with a definition of climate change that restricted their investigation to only human causes.

YPCCC cited research published in Science that found that only 30 percent of middle school and 45 percent of high school science teachers understand the degree of scientific consensus on human - caused climate change.

A recent paper in Nature Climate Change (LINK) shows only 35 % 0f Americans believe global warming was the cause of the warm winter in 2012.

Scientists do have better things to do with their time than answer questions raised on climate skeptic blogs, and as a result, you will only generally be assured of a climate change paper taking a stance on the cause of the change if the subject of the paper is an attribution study.

This is not a careful argument, because people — sceptical and not — have been questioning the leaps between observing that the earths temperature changes, the attribution of that change to humans, the conclusion that it will cause catastrophe, and that the only way to confront that catastrophe is by mitigating climate change through reduction in emissions.

Proof that CO2 has no effect on climate and identification of the two factors that do cause reported climate change (sunspot number is the only independent variable) are at http://agwunveiled.blogspot.com (now with 5 - year running - average smoothing of measured average global temperature (AGT), the near - perfect explanation of AGT since before 1900; R ^ 2 = 0.97 +).

To be clear, Donald Trump and his campaign still firmly rejects the scientific evidence that climate change is human - caused, opposing the only action (a reduction of fossil fuel burning) that can save us from ever - more dangerous climate change impacts.

But science proves that CO2 levels — which make up only 0.04 percent of the atmosphere — are not the cause of warming or of other changes in the climate.

Across the UK, only 13 % of the population take the opinion that climate change is not caused by human activity.

For example, understanding that global warming is not a proven science and that there is no circumstantial evidence for global warming alarmism — which is why we see goats like political charlatans like Al Gore showing debunked graphs like the «hockey stick» to scare the folks — and, not understanding that climate change the usual thing not the unusual thing and that the climate change we observed can be explained by natural causes is the only thing that really separates we the people from superstitious and ignorant government - funded schoolteachers on the issue of global warming... that and the fact that global warming alarmists do not believe in the scientific method nor most of the principles upon which the country was founded.

«The only safe way to tackle climate change is to address the root cause — our continued reliance on the burning of fossil fuels,» Mann said.

Obama's disingenuous Tweet, whether it be «dangerous», «catastrophic» or «apocalyptic» — and he did use the word dangerous — is disingenuous because there is no such consensus on the dangers of climate change, only that climate is changing and it is likely caused, at least in part, by humans.

While bleaching is far from the only cause of reef decline in the Caribbean, the repeated coral bleaching events since the 1980s have been strongly attributed to anthropogenic climate change [1].

In fact, only 39 percent think «climate scientists can be trusted a lot to give full and accurate info on causes of climate change.»

Today, only 42 percent of Americans believe that human - caused climate change is real.

The actual definition from the United Nations Environment Program (article 1) of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) limits them to only human causes.

As it stands there's no empirical evidence of any sort that CO2 causes climate warming, and indeed now the ipcc is maintaining that CO2 is both a cause and an effect of temperature change, which, unless CO2 was only an insignificant contributor to warming, would without a doubt lead to a runaway greenhouse with boiling oceans.

But the US is not the only country with a shameful track record, most developed countries have emitted outrageously larger amounts of climate change causing gases to the atmosphere than most of the rest of the world.

Although his project's latest survey conducted in the spring, showed that 70 percent of the public believes climate change is occurring — a near record level — only 53 percent believe global warming is caused by humans and only 16 percent say they are «very worried» about it.

The proof and identification of the two factors that do cause reported climate change (sunspot number is the only independent variable) are at http://agwunveiled.blogspot.com (now with 5 - year running - average smoothing of measured average global temperature (AGT), the near - perfect explanation of AGT since before 1900; R ^ 2 = 0.97 +).

And what the study found was that, due to continued rising temperatures associated with human caused climate change, only another 3 percent deforestation would be enough to transform fully half of the Amazon into Savannah.

During his speech on August 31 in Alaska, President Obama not only spoke about the enormity of the climate change threat and the urgency of strong action, he also acknowledged that the United States has responsibility for causing the problem.

But what I find interesting is that the supposed 97 % consensus on climate change (which we know is bogus anyway) turns into only 67 % when we consider the number of people who believe climate change is mostly or entirely caused by...