The only clues about what caused his paralysis were on his body.
The only clues about what caused his paralysis were on -LSB-...]
The only clue about who might be behind STGG comes from a request for a zoning permit it submitted to Brooklyn borough hall in 2015, which noted that the sole tenant of the property STGG owns is based out of is Prime Home Health Services.
That $ 500,000 call offers
only a clue about how lobbyists affect the billions of dollars spent each year by state agencies and their little - known relatives, the state authorities.
The only clue about the new game so far is a distorted image of what looks to be a sold...
Not exact matches
If
only there were some kind of
clue in the first post by Guccifer2 posted
about 3wks before WL published DNC emails https://t.co/WYTK9okNYz pic.twitter.com/rgWvA 1mXjg
Nasser offered few
clues about how Aramco will attract investors,
only saying the company will be «competing» with the best in Big Oil.
For example, if an asset's price is wildly going up and down, you might have no
clue about where the price will be a half of an hour from now, but you can say with a degree of certainty that the touch price will probably touched upon, even if it is for
only a very brief moment.
Just because you
only see and believe what you want to see and believe doesn't mean you have a
clue about much of anything.
In a time that promises the reconcilation of happiness and productivity through chemical mood control, we can claim a right to our «natural moods»
only if we can show that they aren't — like everything else in the cosmos — finally random collections chemicals or just tools for species survival but are natural gifts or indispensable
clues to the truth
about who we are.
A Canadian 15 - year - old named William Gadoury
only furthered our concerns
about the next generation, by using historical
clues to possibly discover the long - lost Mayan City he calls «The Fire Mouth» by analyzing satellite imagery on Google maps.
That distinction is a half - truth at best, and it misses two important points: the widespread reading of such books not
only tells us something important
about the overall religious temper of our times; it may also give us a
clue to one possible theological expression of the future.
Hey @Charles Stevens, Attempting to insult the intelligence of someone you have absolutely no
clue about,
only shows your lack of intelligence.
You said, «Attempting to insult the intelligence of someone you have absolutely no
clue about,
only shows your lack of intelligence.»
When CS Lewis wrote his stories
about Narnia, was he speaking
only from his imagination, or was he giving
clues about how to get into Narnia?
Anyone that believes that 8 people from Noah's ark populated the entire earth in such diversity of races in such a short period of time does not
only not have a
clue about science but also of basic arithmetic.
to say its
only a small group of people tells me that you have no
clue what % your talking
about.
And finally, a real Mosaic brainteaser
about seven brothers who do their brotherly duty by marrying each other's childless widow,
only to find themselves all in heaven without a
clue as to who gets to call her «my wife.»
This tells me that the
only reason he is in play is because he is white and rich, because he does not have a
clue about anything that is going on around him but the boardroom, nor does he understand anything
about the middle class.
Although we have
only a few
clues about the nature of the appearance of Jesus to Paul, we must not assume that it was necessarily a vision of the historical Jesus standing before him.
-- And this is
only a partial list there are still many organizations that also back this up but this makes the point that you have NO
clue what you're talking
about.
Whatever the ambiguity of the cosmic
clues, Bellow is optimistic
about humanity's future and has
only scorn for Weltschmertz.
You can be a Christian and not have a
clue who God is -----
Only the arrogant think they know details
about who God is.
Our
only clue, from the mouth of Garland himself, is that Annihilation is
about self - destruction.
The
only way you can see it as being perfect is if you have no
clue of what you're talking
about.
the fact that today in the USA there is more religion (or religiosity) is
only a clear
clue about the fact that there is more ignorance.
When you're hunting your gone all day, walking for miles and interesting animals come home that you have no
clue what to do with.The
only good thing
about this hunting trip was I did not go and the granola bars I made.
I know more people who think like that compared to idiots who think silver is the
only thing... and then it is usually because the idiot has no
clue about football and just wants to rub it in that his «team» finished 1st.
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self,
only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have
only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think
about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so
only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing
about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a
clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
How on earth can Arsenals future be bright when the club is owned by a scum parasite who cares
only about his personal wealth, is run by a manager 20 years out of date and completely out of touch with all football reality and when we have a board full of amateurs, who lie, don't have a
clue about football and are rudderless and diretionless.
Telling me players are not to blame is absolutely rubbish, they are to blame, yes Monaco mission was to relax and repell Arsenal and if possible shut them down completely, this gam was ours to take, First the pressure was on Monaco, they didn't know how to go
about it, whether to defend their 3 - 1 advantage or press us, we had more than enough clear cut chances but as usual we were clueless in front of goal, we tried to open them apart which is impossible, Carzolla and Alexis played as if we lead 15 - 0, holding balls, try to dribble every time they have the ball and and reduce the pace and any chance of other to get through, losing balls carelessly, poor crosses is now our style, it doesn't threatened even Charlton athletic coz everyone now knows our crosses is poorly delivered and our attackers also don't have a
clue how to do it even if one get through it will be wasted, this game should have been won by range attempts which was
only tried once by ÖZIL and was blocked.
But it could and would have been so much different if
only our attacking players had some sort of
clue about how to put the ball in the back of the net.
Also, re him knowing
about SAF retiring months ago - bullshit, even SAF's staff did not know, not everyone at the Club knew, Sir Bobby did not know, Maureen
only knew after SAF told everyone, which was a month ago, he should stop trying to be too clever, his comments after SAF announced retirement and before show he had no
clue, he know SAF might retire, he wanted the job, he pitched for it and lost.
Not
only will they love searching for these indoor
clues, they'll also learn some fun facts and interesting tidbits
about the first Thanksgiving: In 1620, a long time ago, a journey did begin.
I would say just talk to them
about the potty read up on babycenter
about the different things to help the process along because even if they are not talking that much they still may give off many non verbal
clues of having to go potty.However if they are really not ready try potty training keep a onesie on in the day time with their clothing and a blanket sleeper on at night that way they hopefully won't be able to get to the dirty diaper before you.My dd is 19 months as well and I have been training her sort of by letting her sit on the potty I have
only let her use the one that goes on the big toilet but she peed in it once and she often will say she has to pee when in the bathroom but will sit and not do anything and get little pieces of tissue off the roll and push it into toilet this is her renditon of wiping even though the tissue does not really come in contact with any areas that need to be wiped I have slacked off on the training because she can not pull her pants up and down which is on the list of things kids need to be able to do to go by themseleves.Maybe just get them a few books and videos and a potty chair and talk to your dd's and see what happens you may be surpised.HTH
«What's most frustrating
about these reports is that
only «Albany» is cited — do we have any
clue what individuals * in * Albany are responsible for diverting the MTA's funds?»
Many have no
clue about the ideals of the party and
only see political association as an economic association, further emboldening the so - called kingmakers.
These and future experiments not
only help confirm that the universe inflated dramatically, but are providing theorists with the first
clues about the exotic forces that drove space and time apart.
There were
only scant
clues about life on Rapa Nui.
It contains conversations with 16 prominent neuroscientists, biologists and psychologists, but
only one is female — a
clue about one of the book's flaws, namely, that much of its content is obsolete.
The
only one of those factors that scientists had a
clue about at the time was the formation rate of sunlike stars.
The find also adds to the tantalizing
clues about how these moose - sized, presumably shaggy progenitors fit into the camel family tree — a lineage that today boasts
only two species of true camels but includes plenty of South American relatives such as llamas, alpacas, guanacos, and vicuñas.
Each NASA rover has delivered a wealth of information
about the history and composition of the Red Planet, but a rover's vision is limited by the view of onboard cameras, and images from spacecraft orbiting Mars are the
only other
clues to where to drive it.
According to Kosik, this work not
only identifies a very critical gene for human brain development but also offers a
clue about a component that likely contributed to brain expansion in humans.
The findings, published in the journal Neuropsychopharmacology, not
only provide
clues about how these drugs affect healthy brains, they also hint at a previously undiscovered link between glutamate and mood.
Only recently have researchers begun to dig up some meaningful
clues about this seemingly useless body part.
Studies such as this are important not
only because they provide
clues about how ancient people lived.
Neutrinos therefore represent a unique window into an otherwise invisible universe, even offering
clues about the missing mass called dark matter, whose presence can be inferred
only by its gravitational influence on stars and galaxies.
Its intricate eye — and it has
only one — is a
clue to the creature's overall complexity: Last year scientists found that it has 30,907 genes,
about 5,000 more than humans have.
Although
only about 10 % of prostate cancer victims inherit the disease, the genetic culprit could reveal broader
clues about how prostate cancer wreaks its damage.