Sentences with phrase «only death risk»

This plan covers only the death risk and has no maturity benefit.

Earlier insurance used to cover only the death risk of an individual at very low premiums in the form of a term insurance plan.

It often becomes difficult for the agents to make them understand that term plans cover only the death risk and the coverage amount is quite large in comparison with other life insurance plans.

This is because they cover only death risk and there are no returns.

Not exact matches

Knocking back three to five cups in a day produced a 15 percent reduced risk of death, although oddly if people drank more than five cups, they reduced their risk by only 12 percent.

Not only does driving a truck with outdated equipment put the driver and surrounding motorists at risk, the truck's emissions cause a range of serious illnesses, lung cancer, and even death.

That means making sure prices cover not only the direct costs of supplying energy but also the environmental externalities associated with production and use of fossil fuels — the waste water (which increases a variety of risks), and the broader side effects from vehicle use — congested roads, traffic deaths, and so on.

His research concluded that only those with a high risk of death actually benefited from heart transplants, more than 80 \ % of donor hearts going to patients who were likely to live for longer without a transplant.

Simply to describe death as natural, to try to rid it of its ultimate terror by seeing it as part of the rhythm of life, to view it only from the perspective of the finite — this is to risk losing the deepest ground of our individuality and equality.

Yet, on closer examination, the lives and deaths of Alba Mery Chilito Peñafiel and Alicia Castilla not only illustrate the carnage their country has endured, but also one of its least - understood aspects: Despite belonging to an overwhelming statistical majority, Christians in Colombia who stand up to the violence are remarkably at risk.

If we worship at political shrines that call forth only empty pieties, we risk the death of this heritage through simple neglect.

If Heidegger is right we are always dimly aware that life runs toward death, yet only in special circumstances are we able to know precisely about our own death.5 This means that every commitment in the relationship of love is made in a history with risk and uncertainty.

I was further convinced that the historicity of everything was obvious and that we were doomed to an arbitrary voluntarism in which the only choices were risk and life or caution and death.

The only thing I would say is that FC is holding out in terms of his skill - set — I am not suggesting he is the ultimate solution but he is clearly disciplining himself to death in this role with just the bare minimum of risk / flair on display.

Available free of charge on MomsTEAM's new SmartTeams concussion website, the #TeamUp4ConcussionSafetyTM program, developed by MomsTEAM Institute as part of its SmartTeams Play SafeTM initiative with a Mind Matters Educational Challenge Grant from the National Collegiate Athletic Association and Department of Defense, is designed to do just that: to increase reporting by athletes of concussion symptoms by engaging coaches, athletes, parents, and health care providers in a season - long, indeed career - long program which emphasizes that immediate reporting of concussion symptoms - not just by athletes themselves but by their teammate «buddies» - not only reduces the risk the athlete will suffer a more serious brain injury - or, in rare cases, even death - but is actually helps the team's chances of winning, not just in that game, but, by giving athletes the best chance to return as quickly as possible from concussion, the rest of the season, and by teaching that honest reporting is a valued team behavior and a hallmark of a good teammate.

Not only that, but studies by the American Academy of Pediatrics have shown a direct link between the risk of SIDS (Sudden Infant Death Syndrome) and the use of pacifiers; the reasons why aren't known exactly, but there has shown to be a direct link.

If properly trained midwives exclude higher risk patients in advance, then why is their death rate acceptable only in a study that has much stricter criteria for inclusion than real life?

Attempting a VBAC is a reasonable option in a hospital that is appropriately staffed, IF and ONLY IF a mother understands that death and brain damage will inevitably occur in some babies even if you are low risk, even if your doctor is standing right there, and even if you have immediate surgery.

Other homebirth advocates emphasize that the absolute risk of death is low (true) or that only women having first babies are at risk for homebirth death (false).

When I finally had a chance to speak, we were already running over the 2 1/2 hours allotted for the roundtable, so I was only able to briefly touch on two of my many message points: one, that the game can be and is being made safer, and two, that, based on my experience following a high school football team in Oklahoma this past season - which will be the subject of a MomsTEAM documentary to be released in early 2013 called The Smartest Team - I saw the use of hit sensors in football helmets as offering an exciting technological «end around» the problem of chronic under - reporting of concussions that continues to plague the sport and remains a major impediment, in my view, to keeping kids safe (the reasons: if an athlete is allowed to keep playing with a concussion, studies show that their recovery is likely to take longer, and they are at increased risk of long - term problems (e.g. early dementia, depression, more rapid aging of the brain, and in rare cases, chronic traumatic encephalopathy, and in extremely rare instances, catastrophic injury or death.)

It's extremely selfish of the women to risk not only death but permanent brain injury for their children, then ask all of us to pay for their stupidity.

The chance of a death if he were sober would be only 0.000012 % so the entire 0.0085 % is an excess risk of death from being drunk.

Parents often purchase these monitoring devices with the hope that having more information will not only keep their baby healthier and lower their risk of SIDS (Sudden Infant Death Syndrome), but also help to quiet their parental worries and concerns.

The risk of death to a newborn delivered vaginally to a low - risk woman is only 0.62 per 1,000 live births.

And I agree with you, that it would be completely inappropriate to say that homebirth has lower risk of death if the rate is say, 1 / 100 deaths, but 1/40, 000 in a hospital (obviously those are fictitious numbers used for illustration purposes)... but then you also have to account for the rate among individual OB's if you want a more accurate comparison, since there are multiple OBs typically in a hospital, being compared to only one midwife.

The 1998 and 2005 AAP policy statements and the Back to Sleep campaign not only addressed the importance of back sleeping but also provided recommendations for other infant care practices that may reduce the risk of SIDS and other sleep - related infant deaths.1, 9 Unfortunately, the ability to measure the prevalence of these other risk factors is limited by lack of data.

Many of the deaths had been preceded by warning signs such as the presence of meconium and fetal bradycardia, in addition to pre-existing risks, without any action being taken or only too little, too late.

While HELLP syndrome is rare, effecting only 1 or 2 out of every 1000 births, without early treatment HELLP syndrome carries with it a high risk of severe health complications, including death, for the mother and fetus.

We restricted the denominator to live births for all other outcomes, since only live - born neonates were at risk for those outcomes (e.g., neonatal death).

It is important to note that this study included only planned home births, and under - counted the actual risk of death at home birth in 3 separate ways:

C - sections not only increase the mother's risk of death, they also have long term health implications for the child.

In October 2016, the American Association of Pediatrics (AAP) expanded their SIDS recommendations from focusing only on SIDS to focusing on a safe sleep environment that can reduce the risk of all sleep - related infant deaths, including SIDS.

Without having looked into it, I am just wondering how the death rate of ONLY the higher risk women compares to similar risks at the hospital.

The overall death rate from labor through six weeks was 2.06 per 1000 when higher risk women (i.e., those with breech babies or twins, those attempting VBAC, or those with preeclampsia or gestational diabetes) are included in the sample, and 1.61 per 1000 when only low risk women are included.

Babies who were breastfed had only 12 % risk of death compared to with those who were not breastfed.

If you look at the death rate when high - risk pregnancies falsely classified as low - risk are included (midwives claim to only attend low - risk births), you've gotten up to 2.0 per thousand deaths and about 40 per thousand permanently injured for a total of 42 per thousand dead or permanently injured.

And «All risk hospital birth,» excluding only young preemies but INcluding loads of risk factors totally absent for MANA's pool, still has a death rate half that of MANA's low - risk group.

No, that doesn't have to be the ONLY risks, but you can't deny that death is certainly an adverse outcome.

Despite the fact that the authors surveyed only a small proportion of practicing midwives, who submitted data that was not validated, and despite the fact that they authors performed a variety of maneuvers that violated basic standards of statistical analysis, and despite the fact that they were intent on concluding that homebirth is «safe» regardless of what the data showed, they actually showed that homebirth has a minimum rate of death 5.5 X higher than comparable risk hospital birth.

Artificial feeding in an emergency carries high risks of malnutrition, illness and death and is a last resort only when other safer options have first been fully explored.

Not only can it increases the risk of suffocation in children, it can also lead to SIDS — Sudden Infant Death Syndrome.

The AAP (American Academy of Pediatrics) actually only recommends movement sensors for certain at - risk babies, but for some parents who really want a peace of mind with regard to SIDS (sudden infant death syndrome), they feel this is an option they truly care about.

Reduced risk of SIDS (sudden infant death syndrome) Statistics reveal that for every 87 deaths from SIDS, only 3 are breastfed.

Place your baby only on his back for sleep; this position has reduced the risk of SIDS deaths by more than 50 percent since 1991, according to the AAP.

The AAP, therefore, is expanding its recommendations from being only SIDS - focused to focusing on a safe sleep environment that can reduce the risk of all sleep - related infant deaths including SIDS.

The AAP, therefore, is expanding its recommendations from focusing only on SIDS to focusing on a safe sleep environment that can reduce the risk of all sleep - related infant deaths, including SIDS.

Indeed, the risk posed to any one baby by misuse of these products is likely very small; according to Scheers» study, for instance, the CPSC got reports of only 23 bumper - related deaths from 2006 to 2012.

70 % is extreme — in USA only one state (Alaska) has the majority of bedsharing deaths happening with drugs or alcohol as additional risk factor present (large minority population where that is prevalent too).

Either they can «inform» (whatever this loosely - defined term means) on the only people who have ever made any effort to help them integrate into their country, or they can be sent back to a lawless war zone where they risk detention, torture or death by drone.

«We wondered whether some of those same genes could also cause seizures if they were expressed in the brain and, if so, whether those genes would also place people with epilepsy at risk not only for having epilepsy but also an abnormal heart beat and risk of death,» said Noebels.