Sentences with phrase «only decision points»

As a SAP you represent the major decision point (and in some cases the only decision point) an employer may have in choosing whether or not to place an employee behind the steering wheel of a school bus, in the cockpit of a plane, at the helm of an oil tanker, at the throttle of a train, in the engineer compartment of a subway car, or at the emergency control valves of a natural gas pipeline.

Not exact matches

Some time after this Decision Point began collecting NYSE common stock only (CSO) breadth and volume data, and we have a set of NYSE CSO indicators that are available to subscribers through our Straight Shots Menu, as well as various indicator series.

Taken to its logical extreme, his research seems to argue that boards should have only female directors, but he's careful to point out that not all women score highly on complex moral reason (sometimes known as «CMR») decision - making, and some men do.

At the CECP's CEO Investor Forum in February, Polman said — only half joking — that he felt empowered to make this decision immediately because, «My simple point was the day they are hiring you, they are not going to fire you.»

From that point, February 10, until I announced my formal recusal on March 2, I was never briefed on any investigative details and did not access information about the investigation; I received only the limited information that the department's career officials determined was necessary to inform my recusal decision.

Aeroplan has now reversed that decision, angering only those who didn't quite have enough points for their dream vacation and spent all their points on Alouettes tickets the day before the announcement, expecting their miles to begin expiring on Jan. 1, 2014.

A steady stream of it informs much of the decision - making at the Toronto - based company, though Segal is careful to point out that it isn't the only tool Klick uses.

And far from suggesting people should try to rid themselves of all emotional influence in their decision - making, the paper points out that learning to pay attention only to those feelings that are relevant to the decisions being made is what counts.

our budget not only tracks financial inflows and outflows, but can also be used as a starting point to create policies that you can fall back on when making financial decisions.

This is not a realistic starting point, because the real world comprises individuals who make decisions for a myriad of reasons and can only be understood by drilling down to what drives these individual actors.

My point is that discounting anyone because of their faith should only be done if that faith leads them to make negative decisions.

In Ford's analysis of Whitehead this point is quite explicit: «God's decision can only be nontemporal....

At this point the prophets, demanding ethical and religious decisions, achieved not only direct results deliberately sought but an indirect result full of future consequence — they put a premium on nonconformity.

Let us not jump too quickly to a conclusion at this point; if it seems to some that we waste our time while we might be coming to a decision, we take comfort in the thought that it does not follow that we shall have only our trouble for our pains.

All of this is only to point out that the church has lots of money, and we should make careful, wise decisions about how we spend it.

As far as attending the marriage ceremony of gay people i have two points of view the first is that that is there choice to live how they want to but to me that is clearly not Gods best and sin is sin and needs to be repented of but that is my standard not theres.As far as divorced people remarrying why shouldnt they if they have repented of there past God forgives them not condemns them.As he said to the women caught in adultery do they condemn you and she answers no and he says and neither do i.Go and sin no more.This was not just for the women causght in adultery this lesson was for every one of us he was addressing our sin publically for all have sinned and fall short of the Glory of God that being his son Jesus Christ he is telling us that we must make the same decision to go and sin no more to repent in our hearts and the only way to do that is to give our hearts and lives totally to Jesus Christ other wise we are no better than the hypocrites in JESUS day.brentnz

For one, the universe may only appear to have order, just as causation may only appear to actually exist, when in fact any given event may be said to have unlimited causes and we only limit are decision on what «truly» caused something to GIVE order to the universe — think about all the finger pointing that goes on every time something unexpected happens.

This is why a little child, even though self - centered by nature, is not a sinner, and sin is «original» only in the sense that the natural self - centeredness of childhood, if uncurbed, becomes sinful as the individual matures to the point of responsible decision.

It extends to all situations in which a judgment or a decision can be made only at the end of a debate or confrontation between adverse opinions and conflicting points of view.

If we reflect on this chain we can never point to one of its links and say with absolute certainty: this is due only to my free and responsible decision.

But at this point only silence ensues; and the decision goes toYahweh, not by default, but by the demonstration of the complete powerlessness and inanity of the others.

Janet i think what you have said is quite insightful and you are right and there is another meaning to Go and sin no more and that speaks to me of repentence making a decision to Follow Christ the one who saves.The words Go and sin no more is referring to a continual ongoinging process of living for Christ rather than dying in our sins daily there is no comparison.I thought that was awesome pointing the law back to all of us for we all have sinned and the judgement is death but Jesus came that we might have life in its fullness.Many people only see the adulterer when she portrays who we are as sinners that he came to save all of us sin is sin and the punishment is death so again you are quite right people use the scriptures to judge and that was never Jesus intention.I hope that helps when someone uses that scripture incorrectly and you can you use it like Jesus did to point it back at those who judge i hope that helps.brentnz

Therefore we have to respect those principles which point beyond present decision to an order of life which we can specify only in general and revisable terms.

That there is not only chaos, that in fact extremely complex patterns of order have emerged and sustained themselves over eons, points to the fact that the possibilities are not ordered only in terms of immediate relevance but ordered also so that there are established limits that ensure some correlation among the many decisions that jointly make up the settled world.

When it was revealed that rehabilitation efforts were also stopped with the decision to end the tube feedings and that even antibiotics were now considered «life support,» an editorial in the St. Louis Review (the archdiocesan newspaper) pointed out that «In a situation where the health of the patient depends not only upon food and water, but on other forms of care and treatment, the purpose of providing food and water should not be undermined by a neglect of the other forms of care.

The only point I was trying to make is that viewing life as story helps me make decisions about the future.

The most frustrating but also the best thing is so far we drop points because of bad official decision (Everton, Hull,...) or individual mistakes (Swansea, Man Utd, Hull,...) rather than our opposition push us (only happen at Dortmund away)-- that means we have our fates in our hands, and we still have time to turn things around — especially when we have our 1st team player back from injury.

Long overdue decision if you ask me, if only Wenger had been braver earlier on in the season the Kos / Gab partnership would have properly gel by now... but this is Wenger we are talking about, he might still decide to opt for his favorite, meritocracy is not one of Wenger's strong point

Now we only need the FA to award us 15 points in lieu of all the bad decisions against us and hey bobs your uncle the league is ours.

A man can only take so many last minute winners and dodgy penalty decisions before the stress gets to your head, literally... Their comes a point when the hairline starts to slowly creep back and the thatching thins, but never fear, with your new found fortune you can pull a Rooney and hit the reset button with a brand spanking new noggin!

Let's face it goalkeepers tend to march to the beat of a different drum and Szczesny certainly fell into that category, but most of his antics were relatively harmless and simply reflected a certain level of immaturity that isn't uncommon for someone thrust into the limelight at such a young age... lord knows we've seen that happen with numerous players throughout the years and very few were ever banished for such behaviour... the only on - field action that drove me crazy was his inability to take a deep breath and not try to rush the play with an ill - timed throw at certain points in the game when common sense suggested holding the ball and slowing things down... the fact that he continued to do this probably had a lot to do with the glaring lack of coaching time spent with the goalkeepers... ultimately he made the fateful decision to take his frustrations out into the public sphere and paid dearly for it... in the end, his services were wanted by several of the best Italian squads, which is significant considering the historical importance placed on the defensive side of the ball in Serie A... all I know is that if someone asked me to pick the most athletically gifted goalkeeper we have had in our squad since the arrival of Wenger, without hesitation, he would be my pick and for that reason his departure is more than a little disappointing... what else is new though

I saw the article on JUst Arsenal about Arsene Wenger and his decision to mkae only two changes to the Arsenal XI for the home game against Everton today and I must say that I agree in general with the point that it was a really risky move from the Prof.

These decisions not only have an impact with points, but just look at the solidarity and passion shown by the entire squad to win a such a fashion.

This season we recently had the burnley game, all of our close opponents except chelsea had played and dropped points, we were at home and only managed the win due to an offside penalty decision, basically we bottled it, but got away with it through a lot of luck.

why did we play Welbeck in the striker's role... no one can question his heart but to have a player with such limited first - touch and finishing skills against such a game opponent with Lacazette on the bench is almost unforgivable... maybe it's because Welbeck tows the party line or maybe it's because Welbeck doesn't know anything but 100 % on the pitch, unfortunately neither of these qualities makes him a capable starting striker on a team with any real aspirations... I can only hope that he was being showcased for a move elsewhere, as there was some talk last week about some interest from Everton... if he moved on that would be the only silver lining of this coach's decision, but once again it wouldn't excuse this club for putting business decisions ahead of fielding the best possible team to secure 3 points at Anfield

my point is this, Wenger has not only made bad decisions in tactics for games and in some team selections and substitutions, but he had also made some dismal business decisions.

Benson has been dominating this year, but a smart decision by John Belien to double team the big man with Jordan Morgan and Jon Horford kept Benson in check with only 11 points.

Had a linesman got a decision right we would have been on ten points not seven and been only two behind city and six ahead of Chelsea.

I saw the article on JUst Arsenal about Arsene Wenger and his decision to mkae only two changes to the Arsenal XI for the home game against Everton today and I must say that I agree in general with the point that it was a really risky move from the Prof.... Read the full article here

Seeing how stacked the SDL roster is at the moment, I think it was a right decision from that point of view to not move him there, but he is basically the only guy at the top with his skillset in the land of giants.

Im 100 % with you — from what I have seen — the actions of the Browns — the evidence would point to not only Sashi making the ill fated decisions on the QBs — but also implications that Hue may have had contrary opinions that were not in anyway final.

Napier, who averaged 17.1 points and 4.6 assists per game as a junior in 2012 - 13, was the only real surprise of the three Huskies who made public their decisions to return to Storrs.

However, his decision to set up his team to play a back three for only the second time in a competitive game since taking over at Tottenham Hotspur in May 2014 ultimately ensured the visitors escaped the Emirates with a point, and evidence that their latest back - up plan works.

The only real point of interest was Brendan Rodgers» decision to move to a back three and his subsequent change back to the favoured formation midway through the second half.

The only other thing I wanted to mention was regarding Jody's comment — «5) my parents respected me enough to allow me that decision and at this point I've not found a valid reason to pursue such a pointless operation.»

I agree with you, but the only point which seems to be lacking is the incentive effect of greater protection for breastfeeding mothers (and for women of childbearing age and potential generally) on hiring and promotion decisions.

And while letting your child make a decision about whether or not they want to be tickled may not have been the point of that particular study, it's still an example of an area where we should let our little ones voice their own opinions and maybe even more importantly, learn that only they are in control of their own bodies.

-LSB-...] Ultimately, if the point of WIC is to improve the health of low income mothers and babies and if the goal of the CDC is to increase breastfeeding rates in order to improve the health of the nation, all decisions about how WIC's support to moms and infants is provided should be done with a view to supporting breastfeeding first and foremost, with formula as an option only available upon specific request.

The point of my story is to say that we all need to support each other's decisions, whether that be to nurse in public, in private only or to breast feed (or not).

Assuming that decision - makers make cost - benefit analyses when deciding to use force, China's doctrine calls for acquiring a nuclear arsenal only large enough to destroy an adversary's «strategic points» in such a way that the expected costs of a first strike outweigh the anticipated benefits.