Sentences with phrase «only decrease funding»

They can only do this for healthcare - related appropriations, and only if it does not increase the deficit (meaning that without any other shenanigans, they can only decrease funding).

Not exact matches

Taken as a group, the funds proved to be so rich and so conservatively managed that they not only could weather the storm but, by happy inadvertence, could do something to decrease its violence.
That trend has only slightly decreased over time, with public funding making up 56 percent of the total costs of new NFL stadiums and renovations from 1997 to 2015, according to the Minnesota Convention, Leisure & Tourism Association.
Despite a reduction of 98.5 open hours per week (6 % of 2010 total weekly open hours) in response to reduced funding in 2011, B&ECPL has experienced no decrease in circulation through October, while year - to - date public access computer use has decreased only 3.6 % across the System.
Although 20 states had reported decreased or stable budgets for K — 12 education and 28 reported cuts or level funding for state education agencies, only 12 states reported cutting back on common core implementation because of budget constraints.
The NAEP scores they focus on do not correspond in most of the cases to the relevant years in which the court orders were actually implemented; they ignore the fact that, as in Kentucky, initial increases in funding are sometimes followed by substantial decreases in later years; and their use of NAEP scores makes no sense in a state like New Jersey, where the court orders covered only a subset of the state's students (i.e., students in 31 poor urban school districts) and not the full statewide populations represented by NAEP scores.
When the public was asked whether government funding for public schools in their district should increase, decrease, or stay the same, 59 percent selected the first option, only slightly less than the 63 percent that gave that opinion in 2010, and dramatically more than in 2009 (46 percent).
When asked whether «local taxes to fund public schools in your district should increase, decrease, or stay the same,» only 29 percent of the public favor an increase (see Figure 1a).
Meanwhile, state officials reported dropout decreases in large school systems such as Charlotte - Mecklenburg Schools and Wake County Schools, although some public school advocates point out that may only indicate state funding shortfalls will have the least impact on school systems with the resources to blunt the damage.
Only 25 states, a decrease of three states since 1999, require and fund academic intervention programs in at least one subject at one level for students who are struggling to meet the standards.
Like many school districts in economically - depressed areas, job losses in and around Fayette County led not only to decreased enrollment in Connellsville Area School District, but decreased funding as well.
Not only has state funding for CPS decreased by 8 percent over the past eight years, but the State has actually increased funding to other districts by 45 percent.
For example, if you would have had 100 % of your non TSP investments in the Vanguard Wellesley Income Fund (VWELX) before the last bear market started in 2008 your investment would have only decreased approximately 9 % compared to a more than 50 % drop in the DOW & S&P indexes and you would have recovered all of your losses in less than a year!
What is also interesting to note is that the fund house decreased the ratio in the first 3 months of the last financial year, only to increase it again.
If interest rates were to rise only 1 %, the value of a typical short - term bond fund would decrease by about 2 %, and the value of a typical intermediate - term bond fund would decrease by about 5 %.
This is an important distinction for widows and widowers and the G fund is a safe haven for your account considering that it is the only fund guaranteed never to decrease in value.
The bulk of the money (# 9 million) will be drawn from Arts Council England's emergency reserves and only # 1.8 million will come from a cut in the funding that Art Council England provides to its regularly funded organizations (RFOs), equivalent to a 0.5 % decrease in one of each RFOs quarterly payments.
Hello I would like to share my master plan of new जीवन anand policy My age is 30 I have purchased 7 policies of 1 lac sum assured and each maturity year term 26 to 32 I purchased in 2017 Along with I have purchased 3 policies of same jivananad of 11lac each Maturity year term 33,34,35 Now what will I have to pay is rs, 130000 premium per year means 370rs per day At age of 55 in year 2047 I will start getting return, of, 3lac maturity per year till 2054 For 7policies of i lac I buyed for safety of paying next 10 years premium of 130000 As year by year my liability goes on decreasing and at the age of 62 to 65 I get my major part of maturity amount around 16000000 one crore sixty lac Along with 4000000 sum assured continued for rest of life So from above example it is true that you can make money to make money for you You can enjoy a large sum by just paying 370 per day and you will feel you have earned 19000000 / 35 years = 1500 per day And assume if I die after 5 years then in this case also my spouse will get 7500000 as death claim against 650000 paid premium Whats bad in this A asset is getting created for you It is a property of 2 crores which you are buying for 35 year installment If you make fd of 2000000 Lacs against this policy u will get 135000 interest per year to pay for 35 years If u buy a flat for 20 lack in 2017 there is no scope of valuation of Flat will be 2 crores But as I described you are creating a class asset for your beloved easily just investing 10500 per year for 35 years And too buy a term of 50 Lacs with it And rest you earn deposit in ppf Keep in mind if you will survive then only ppf will create corpus for you but in lic your family is insured to a higher extent till 1 crore with term including And its sufficient if you are earning 100000per Month no problem for investing of 10 % in New जीवन anand with rest 90 % you go with ppf, mutual funds, equity, gold, lottery, real estate any thing but keep 10 % for new jeewan anand it's a class if you understand it properly and after all if you rely only on term there are more chances of rejecting claims as one thing is sure cheap things just come under warranty but lic brand is guaranteed because in case of demise if your nominee doesn't get claim then your all hardwork is going to be waste so think and invest take long term and bigger sum assured for least premium You can assign your policy for taking flat or property it is a legal asset of you But term never.
Those funds can only be decreased by purchases from NPCs and sales - taxes, I have not yet figured out how to destroy funds otherwise, though I would not wish to do so, it's too hard to «Earn» them.
Thus, if in the first quarter, the market received $ 153 million of VC funding, the third quarter saw a decrease with only $ 87 million invested in blockchain - related projects.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z