Sentences with phrase «only evening event»

As the only evening event at Eagle's Eye open to the public the entire summer, the Brewmaster's dinner will sell out quickly and reservations are required.

A wide range of mom only evening events from supper clubs to craft nights, poker to batch cooking, all based on the interests of moms in your chapter.

Not exact matches

Even if it doesn't come up during the interview — which it likely will, if only obliquely — what Fox has called Trump's «obsession» with Kelly will be a kind of sub-text running beneath the event.

«Even though I was only on call one week out of five, and even though getting paged wasn't an everyday occurrence while on call, I grew tired of needing to schedule my life in such a way that I would always be available to respond to a high - priority event if necessary,» former Amazon engineer Eric Aderhold wrote on QuEven though I was only on call one week out of five, and even though getting paged wasn't an everyday occurrence while on call, I grew tired of needing to schedule my life in such a way that I would always be available to respond to a high - priority event if necessary,» former Amazon engineer Eric Aderhold wrote on Queven though getting paged wasn't an everyday occurrence while on call, I grew tired of needing to schedule my life in such a way that I would always be available to respond to a high - priority event if necessary,» former Amazon engineer Eric Aderhold wrote on Quora.

«The Pringles Thanksgiving Dinner flavors are not only new but cover every course of the real meal — from the main event, to sides and even dessert,» he added.

Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer told an invite - only crowd at a Fortune «Most Powerful Women» event on Tuesday evening in Palo Alto, Calif..

Biden will be interviewed by Romney during a Friday evening event in Deer Valley at the invitation - only summit, according to a Biden spokesman and participants briefed on the schedule.

The only event that will save Glencore is a massive helicopter drop of more printed money and I doubt even that will move the needle on commodity prices (except gold and silver, of course) other than a brief knee - jerk bounce.

Tatiana Coin, can be used to retrieve all special kind of items and many more such as autographed memorabilia, passes to backer oriented invite - only events, sponsorship opportunities, house concerts, concert tickets, and even specially crafted, personalized songs.

If a contributor wants to redeem their «Tatiana Coin,» they can do so in exchange for exclusive prizes such as, «autographed memorabilia, passes to backer oriented invite - only events, sponsorship opportunities, house concerts, and even specially crafted, personalized songs.»

Several Google executives at the event were very clear that delivering gigabit internet access over fiber for $ 70 a month (and even free 5 Mbps fiber) is a business that will not only help advance Google's consumer goals, but also make it money.

B) Generate no revenue and have no model for doing so besides â $ œadvertisingâ $ C) Due to (B) the only viable liquidity event is a sale to a major internet player (Yahoo, Google, eBay, MSN) which is very, very unlikely D) Target the same 20 — 30 year old male, tech savvy demographic and will likely never be able to even capture 1 / 100th of the TechCrunch readership after everyone realizes how it just wastes time and solves on real problem

Other classes of stock have preference and my stock is worth $ 0 even at reasonable ale prices (i.e. only participates at high valuation liquidity event).

I am outraged that Heather Cook, the former Episcopal priest, has the audacity to request to be released from prison after serving only two and a half years, not even four years after killing bicyclist Tom Palermo in a horrendous turn of events in which she showed herself to have no moral compass,...

Other popular events include the Statoil Reception (invitation only) on Tuesday evening, the Hebron Showcase on Tuesday afternoon.

So, is the Army not the responsibility of the federal government, and wouldn't their support for a faith specific event such as this (it doesn't even cater to all Christian groups, only the evangelicals) be seen as an endorsement of evangelicalism by the federal government?

Only complete arrogance could convince someone that God would even CARE about a human sporting event.

«36 And, even in the case of the types of events which are uniquely adapted to becoming special acts of God, i.e. human words and deeds, the specialness is still due only to human doing.

But we are silent only because we hope that everything, and this also inevitably includes the guilt of the Church, is again the event of the greater love of God which has mercy on, and even through, the guilt.

Not only are the meager materials in the Gospels which deal with his earlier life obviously legendary and late, but even within the brief compass of his public career no certainty is possible as to the order of events and little as to the historicity of a great many particular events.

In the soul - body analogy; God's knowledge of the world is transcendent in that it transcends human knowledge of bodily events because God is attuned to all while we are attuned to only our nervous system (and even that knowledge is imperfect).

Even if we consider the 2000 years of history that are recorded in the Bible, these biblical records only cover the tiniest fraction of human events that took place during these two millennia.

The common faith of the church — even though it is expressed in terms of belief about the person — rests always, and only, upon the common memory of the event and the common experience of the Spirit.

In other words, even though we have roughly 2000 years of biblical history in Scripture, these records only cover some of the events of some of the people who lived in a tiny, remote, relatively insignificant corner of the world.

He made it as clear as this view can he made that by freedom he meant only doing what one wishes to do, even though these wishes were determined by events taking place before one existed.

How do we approach a Holy Scripture that not only explains events differently than we would, but that also has a very different understanding of what even counts for a reasonable explanation?

The civil disobedience was only one part of a larger protest event, Appalachia Rising, which had the support and involvement of other Christian organizations, like Restoring Eden, and even more Christian individuals, like myself.

For the natural mail, who sees his world in terms only of secular events, such a double image is unnecessary even if possible.

Yet he does not seem to recognize that this can only mean one thing: The revelation of God in Christ must come to you and me by way of a kind of interchange between individuals in deep communion, whereby the meaning of past events can possess our minds and transform our lives, even as it did in the fellowship that formed around Jesus.

It is an event over against what it is not, and regularity is ingredient within it, since it is sustained even if only momentarily, and it thus has an increment of continuity in it (6.203).

And though the dates I've seen have ranged more like 50 - 100 years after Jesus» death, even if we grant only 30 years... Well, try thinking about any conversation you had or event you witnessed 30 years ago, however important or profound that event was in your life.

Only an outline of future events, an abstract and determinable somehow, is available, even for omniscience.

Unlike much of the inherited Western tradition, which has equated creativity with mentality and attributed it only to human beings, process thought considers anything actual at all an instance of creativity, from the tiniest energy event to the most complex creatures we are aware of, human beings; some degree of mentality is present in no matter how rudimentary, even negligible, a form.

For Revelation in the ultimate resort and in principle claims the whole of reality as the possible subject - matter of its affirmations, even if only sub respectu salutis (in relation to salvation), and from this point of view even events and realities which are accessible to secular experience fall within its material scope.

And yet, even for psychicalism — and this explains the qualification «partly» — psychical concepts are also different from obviously formal ideas because they are categorial, and hence universally applicable, not to entities of all logical types, but only to «concrete singulars,» which is to say, individuals and events, as distinct both from aggregates, which are concrete but not singular, and all levels of qualities, which are merely abstract (141).

Man can assert it only if he experiences it as an event in time, even as sin is an event.

To be sure, it was only in the community that the meaning of the event was realized and thus it was only there that the event in the full sense occurred, but, even so, it would obviously be truer (or at least less false) to say that the event produced the church than that the church produced the event, although the Christian would prefer to say that God created both.

Now even a glance at the long course of eschatological reflection among the Jews will reveal that it was concerned predominantly with the culminating event of history and only in a secondary sense and measure with the personal agent through whom this event would be brought to pass.

In one national survey of teenagers, only 35 percent could name all four Gospels, 44 percent did not know how many disciples Jesus had, and 29 percent did not even know what religious event is celebrated at Easter.

but thats not what i'm talking about... i am discussing the god you claim to worship... even if you believe jesus was god on earth it doesn't matter for if you take what he had to say as law then you should take with equal fervor words and commands given from god itself... it stands as logical to do this and i am confused since most only do what jesus said... the dude was only here for 30 years and god has been here for the whole time — he has added, taken away, and revised everything he has set previous to jesus and after his death... thru the prophets — i base my argument on the book itself, so if you have a counter argument i believe you haven't a full understanding of the book — and that would be my overall point... belief without full understanding of or consideration to real life or consequences for the hereafter is equal to a childs belief in santa which is why we atheists feel it is an equal comparision... and santa is clearly a bs story... based on real events from a real historical person but not a magical being by any means!

Hanging on to this concept would thus include recourse to such ultimate microcosmic event - units, so that in the end even the higher totalities could only be conceived as «societies» of such «entities.»

I don't even attend the marriage workshop thing either: the only couple of times I've been to a marriage event, I didn't really dig it.

He notes (p. 110) that in one essay I argued that even remote past events can have direct efficacy, but I intended that this be viewed not as the major explanation of Jesus» efficacy but only as a relevant factor in understanding certain doctrines of his presence.

A number of modern physicists hold that events at the sub-atomic level are not only indeterminable or unpredictable by scientific observation, but that they are also unpredictable even in principle.

His line of reasoning is that, until they actually occur, all future events and their alternatives are merely possible, not actual; and even an omniscient God can not know as actual what in fact is not actual but only possible.

As early as 1911, Paul Langevin pointed out that only the succession of causally unrelated events can be changed into a simultaneity or even be reversed by an appropriate change of the frame of reference; the succession of causally related events remains qualitatively (though not metrically) invariant for any conceivable observer.

We can only assume that the Egyptians, some of whom were participants or even victims, regarded the Egyptian chapter of the exodus event very differently.

Is Stapp's postulation of a well - ordered set of fundamental events with effectively instantaneous communication or causation between them the only or even the best solution to the problem posed by his modified Bell's theorem?

No longer can the world be regarded and defined only as the «material world» to be comprehended in «mathematical concepts,» or even only as the totality of the «properties of the universe» or the «course of events» (cf. TM 5).

By its stress on event and on patterning and integration, by its insistence that relationships constitute an entity, by its concern for an awareness of the depths of human experience (motivations, desires, drives, and «emotional intensity,» for example), as well as by its recognition that we are part of the world and continuous with what has gone before us and even now surrounds and affects us, process thought not only has been in agreement with the newer scientific emphasis on «wholeness,» but has also contributed a perspective which can give that emphasis a meaningful setting and a context in the structure of things in a dynamic universe.