Sentences with phrase «only eye witnesses»

Eye witness accounts are the flimsiest bit of evidence and it's telling that apparently the only eye witnesses were other devout folks who would be gullible enough to believe it.
It's in the book called the bible and the only eye witness who was there to tell us how it happened.

Not exact matches

Not only are there a lot of eye witness accounts of Zeus coming down from Olympus and talking to people, I personally have spoken with Zeus himself.
Obviously jesus didn't have the same historical recording devices as I do, however the only thing that we have to go off of that jesus existed was a book of eye - witness accounts designed by a council that specifically was formed to prove the validity of this specific individual.
At Sikeston, Missouri, about 25 years ago, when I was only about nine years old, I witnessed a MIRACLE with my own two eyes.
It looks much more as though these texts caught the eye, and were regarded as prophetic, only because it was already known, on the testimony of witnesses of the Resurrection appearances, that Jesus was actually encountered as the living Lord on the third day after his death.
Of course, if we had only one Gospel account, people would claim that since there were no additional eye - witness records, the one account was not reliable.
Luke, there tends to only be eye witness accounts when it comes to history.
If you look at the resurrection there are only close associates as supposed «eye witnesses,» unless you count the highly supicious 500 people that Paul, at least I think it was Paul, talks about several years, if not decades later.
Many accounts of Jesus life were written, the most ancient ones written by eye witnesses (luke is the only one that wasnt written by an eye witness) were canonized.
Even if he had been silent about it, there were witnesses enough against him who testified how inhumanly he steeled his mind, how nothing touched him, neither tenderness, nor innocence, nor misery; how his blinded soul had eyes for nothing, and how the senses in him had only eyes for the one thing that he willed.
Yet, as we have already pointed out, there is good evidence for concluding that they are not only not narrated to us directly by eye - witnesses, but that, in addition, they are not even independent of each other.
Here we are on much firmer ground than in the case of the Gospel narratives, for not only is it the earliest written testimony to the resurrection (written about twenty to twenty - five years after the death of Jesus), but it is first - hand testimony, and most probably the «only written testimony to come from one who could claim to be himself an «eye - witness» of the resurrection».18 Admittedly Paul, on his own admission, was in a very unusual category.
Only the «eye witnesses» (LOL) in your cult who made up stories to back the lies had their words included.
Without significant dissent scholars have long regarded it not only as the oldest extant poem of any considerable length in the Old Testament, but also as the work of, if not an eye - witness, then one who was nevertheless close to the event and intimately informed about it.
Scriptural references to these sexual practices, both before and after Leviticus, show God's displeasure with them whether or not any ceremony or idolatry is involved.Response # 2: Despite the UFMCC's contention that the word for abomination (toevah) is usually associated with idolatry, it in fact appears in Proverbs 6:16 - 19 in connection with sins having nothing to do with idolatry or pagan ceremony: There are six things the LORD hates, seven that are detestable [an abomination or toevah] to him: haughty eyes, a lying tongue, hands that shed innocent blood, a heart that devises wicked schemes, feet that are quick to rush into evil, a false witness who pours out lies and a man who stirs up dissension among brothers.Idolatry plays no part in these scriptures; clearly, then, toevah is not limited to idolatrous practices.Response # 3: If the practices in Leviticus 18 and 20 are condemned only because of their association with idolatry, then it logically follows they would be permissible if they were committed apart from idolatry.
irst disciple of tyrannical, seeing the people lying on the ground, everybody scream sound, especially the disciple went ahead to witness the process, it is horrifying to say one word, with incredible eyes staring above forest bathing.But this time, those two disciples, and third class disciple, also arrived here, a lot of people just saw shenwei defeated Lin Mu - exhibition of a dozen people, feet only falters, then nearly fell from the air.
Vera defies her old - fashioned parents and wins a place at Oxford, only to drop out to become a military nurse and do her part for the war effort; through her eyes, we witness the devastation and destruction of warfare on a personal, intimate and life - changing scale.
Based on Jonathan Lethem's novel, the film takes place in 1950s New Tork and follows «a Tourette Syndrome affected private eye Lionel Essrog (Norton) witnesses the murder of his only friend and mentor, by shadowy thugs.
Based on Jonathan Lethem's novel, the film takes place in 1950s New Tork and follows «a Tourette Syndrome affected private eye Lionel Essrog (Norton) witnesses the murder of his only -LSB-...]
We are witnessing the auto industry enter a new phase, one of steely - eyed, hard - nosed business decisions, where shareholder money only will be invested in ways that provide double digit returns, including the cost of capital.
The killer is still at large, and there's only one surviving witness - the boy whose family was killed before his eyes.
Not only did I witness my own dogs» behavior transform before my eyes, but seeing firsthand the impact of these amazing methods over the long - term inspired me to change my own career path and to become a behavioral therapist and trainer myself.
As he said, writing his equivalent of a character reference, «The marvels of the earth a hundred feet high, the marvels of the sea a hundred feet deep, have for their witness only the wild eye that when in need of colours refers simply to the rainbow.»
Consequently, for a judge not to allow defense voir dire / cross examination questioning of a prosecution witness before a damning exhibit is allowed into evidence, presents not only a Due Process issue but also a possible perception of pro-prosecutorial bias of the judge, whether or not that bias exists, at least in the eyes of laypeople watching the trial, when a critical element of a sufficiently functioning judicial system is for the public to perceive judges as following their oaths of office.
So if eye - witness accounts in Gaza were were coerced, then those tricky Hamas thugs somehow knew in advance exactly what would be visible on the UNISAT footage, and cunningly forced people to lie exactly (and only) in ways that would turn out to be compatible with the independently verifiable facts about e.g. the destruction of civilian industrial and agricultural facilities.
In Brooks, the eye witness did not state that Brooks «might» be the perpetrator but instead only said he looked similar to the perpetrator.
But an expert is the principal exception to the hearsay rule, i.e. the rule that only eye - witness testimony can be given in evidence.
Witness RE / MAX agent Tom Day: In his first year on the job, he was eyeing a $ 14,000 commission check when he needed it most — only to watch it slip through his fingers.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z