Sentences with phrase «only factual claim»

Not exact matches

The only «evidence» that ID proponents claim is silly thought experiments like the watch on the beach thing or other factual misrepresentations that have been completely debunked.

Thus, only if claims regarding the existence of God are understood as logically contingent or factual can appeals to experience be said either probatively to «confirm» or to «disconfirm,» which is to say, to «corroborate» or to «falsify» them.

This would not only render the presumably factual principle of uniformity logically necessary, it would also beg the question by simply denying the tenability of the claim that laws evolve and insisting on the notion of uniform causation.

I wasn't aggressive, I wasn't a fanboy, and I actually used factual arguments to back up my claims, so why the disagree, unfortunately, I may not answer, as I can only post once more after to this, but I will read it, so come on, tell me what you disagreed with in my post.

The Factual level: disputes over «matters of fact» a) not only observational, but all claims about the world b) disputes are settled by appeal to methodological level c) at this level the rules are taken as given

Only within the last ~ 250 years has the technology to make reproducible measures OF temperature as required by SCIENCE been available, so CLAIMS involving mentions OF 600 years are NON FACTUAL.

The four month trial, which involved complex evidence from approximately 20 factual and 16 expert witnesses from the US, Switzerland and various jurisdictions in Asia, concluded with Mr Justice Cooke not only dismissing the entirety of SHI's $ 8 billion claim, but also ordering that SHI pay DB over $ 240 million and costs on an indemnity basis.

Putting aside that no case has ever claimed that contribution applies only to but - for causes — good thing because there's many a defendant held liable who received contribution where the conduct wasn't a but - for cause and there's no reason to read any of the apportionment statutes that way — I suppose the conclusion that contribution is limited to but - for causation does follow if the Court believes that the only way there can ever be factual causation is under the but - for test.

One fact - check organization claimed 85 per cent of Trump's factual claims were false, but only 25 per cent of Clinton's facts were false.

As Coulson J stated, «s 33 only applies to personal injury and fatal accident claims, not other forms of civil proceedings» and that such claims «have always been the subject of special rules relating to limitation», that secondly, as evident from countless authorities, «no decision under s 33 can be regarded as setting down definitive guidelines that are automatically applicable in another factual decision; any decision under s 33 has to be regarded as a decision on the particular facts of that case, and nothing more.»

... it is only necessary for an applicant to give a general description of the factual basis of the claim and to provide evidence in the affidavit that the applicant believes the statements in that general description are true.

Despite the status of the registration process as an administrative test only, these conditions require the Native Title Registrar to make an assessment of the factual basis for claimed native title [113] and to be satisfied that at least one member of the native title claim group «currently has or previously had a traditional physical connection with any part of the land or waters covered by the application».