Sentences with phrase «only games of its type»

If your game is the only game of its type, than everyone who wants to play a game of that type is yours, assuming quality & price matches up to their requirements.

That's not to say that Turn 10's racing sim — one of the only games of this type to hold its own against the Gran Turismos of this world — doesn't look the part.

It is currently the only game of its type to be announced which gives Angry Mob Games a massive niche to carve out.

Not exact matches

Facebook, for one, has said that it intends to develop Oculus's virtual reality technology, which is currently only used for immersive video games, into a new type of social platform.

I only tried one game for a few minutes, but Black Box told me there are other games for different types of exercises for the whole body.

To be sure, Tebele isn't the only player in the game, and he's largely banking on a type of humor that, as one critic puts it, «is charmingly moronic by its very architecture.»

We were early in with the Wii with games like Just Dance, and with Xbox Live, making fun multiplayer games, whereas before these types of games were only on PCs for geeks.

Birthday parties have always been very stressful for me but we are reserving the covered area down by the lake for only $ 15, I will probably make cupcakes and a little bit of different snacky - type foods, and would love to put together some games.

«We will not allow ourselves to get caught up in Arsenal having had a couple of difficult games and we are in good form, we can't afford to get caught up in that, we can only afford to play the right type of game.»

This is largely due to the fact that early in the season, there are typically only two types of games:

Earlier in the year, they didn't have the legs to do those types of things because they were dead with only 5 Players by the last part of the Game..

Cleveland Indians third baseman Lonnie Chisenhall had the type of game Monday against the Texas Rangers that only comes around maybe once in a career.

I feel Jack could develop into that type of player, he has recently showed that he is capable of it with regards to steel its only evident with the City game were he went one on one with Yaya Toure, he likes to get stuck in, isn't afraid of a challenge.

Our problem has been that we only seem to be able to deliver those type of games a few times per season.

Also, I don't understand why is he afraid in bringing Ozil later in these type of games and only if the game dictates such move.

This type of criticism should only fuel Giroud's desire to work harder, improve his game and ultimately prove his critics wrong... but letting it affect you negatively and having a defeatest attitude is not conducive to himself or his club.

Don't really understand lucas silvas» logic, yes I understand it's hard to say know to the lure of Real Madrid but surely the boy must realize that if the likes of khedira are struggling to get game time what hope does he have, why go to Madrid to rot on their bench only to be sold elsewhere for a inflated price in a few years, I think silva is the real deal imo and will likely into a Xabi Alonso type player, if we were to move for him a bigger stronger more experienced dm would have to be bought aswell imo

Nothing like one underachiever blowing smoke up the ass of another... we know that Ozil has some incredible technical gifts, but to be considered the best you have to bring more than just assists to the table... for me, a top player has to possess a more well - rounded game, which doesn't mean they need to be a beast on both ends of the pitch, but they must have the ability to take their game to another level when it matters most... although he amassed some record - like stats early on, it set the bar too high, so when people expected him to duplicate those numbers each year the pressure seemed to get the best of our soft - spoken star... obviously that's not an excuse for what has happened in the meantime, but it's important to make note of a few things: (1) his best year was a transition year for many of the traditionally dominant teams in the EPL, so that clearly made the numbers appear better than they actually were and (2) Wenger's system, or lack thereof, didn't do him any favours; by playing him out of position and by not acquiring world - class striker and / or right - side forward that would best fit an Ozil - centered offensive scheme certainly hurt his chances to repeat his earlier peformances, (3) the loss of Cazorla, who took a lot of pressure off Ozil in the midfield and was highly efficient when it came to getting him the ball in space, negatively impacted his effectiveness and (4) he likewise missed a good chunk of games and frankly never looked himself when he eventually returned to the field... overall the Ozil experiment has had mixed reviews and rightfully so, but I do have some empathy for the man because he has always carried himself the same way, whether for Real or the German National team, yet he has only suffered any lengthy down periods with Arsenal... to me that goes directly to this club's inability to surround him with the necessary players to succeed, especially for someone who is a pass first type of player; as such, this simply highlights our club's ineffective and antiquated transfer policies... frankly I'm disappointed in both Ozil and our management team for not stepping up when it counted because they had a chance to do something special, but they didn't have it in them... there is no one that better exemplifies our recent history than Ozil, brief moments of greatness undercut by long periods of disappointing play, only made worse by his mopey posturing like a younger slightly less awkward Wenger... what a terribly waste

With only one win in these types of games so far, I feel very comfortable in saying that we will lose tonight... score draw at best.

Only 3 or 4 teams each year who could win it, 12 or 13 absolute no hopers, straight knock - out stretched out over 2 legs so no single leg FA cup type shock results, total of 8 games to get to the final, sometimes only 6 with bOnly 3 or 4 teams each year who could win it, 12 or 13 absolute no hopers, straight knock - out stretched out over 2 legs so no single leg FA cup type shock results, total of 8 games to get to the final, sometimes only 6 with bonly 6 with byes.

You're the type of person who'll be pardoning our shoddy performance when we lose the Carling Cup («Oh it's only the Carling Cup»), and when we lose against Leicester («Oh it's just the first game of the season, calm down»), get knocked out of the Europa League («Oh it's only the Europa League, who cares about that?»)

Whilst it can be a useful exercise to use pre-season to experiment with formations and tactics this should be reserved for the latter stages of a game once substitutions are made.Crucially Arsenal failed to use game time to acclimatise the players who are likely to start the Season to one another and to continue to develop a team philosophy which had proven so successful in a crucial game at the end of last Season.Reverting to type will only have one end product and it won't go down well with the Arsenal faithful.

Based on his performance, I agree with a lot of the criticism that he does get as you can't be a team player if you only want to play one type of game which suits yourself and is within your comfort zone.

Minus some flashes from both Sead and Iwobi, and a workingman - like effort from Elneny, we learned very little... so here are a few of my observations from today's game, which highlight my concerns about this team moving forward... the fact that Mertz started this game, regardless of our injuries or those being «rested», should be a serious red flag for any true Arsenal fan... if Wenger is preparing to use Mertz with any regularity then the whole thing is a moot point because we are in deep shit... the fact is no quality team would ever have this tin soldier anywhere near there starting eleven except to groom their youthful players, who in turn should be playing in this type of game instead... I can only hope he was simply throwing him a bone for the FA appearance and for agreeing to stay on following the season, but I think the most likely answer is that Wenger's fragile relationship with the fan - base can't be ignored so he felt his experience was a safer bet... unfortunately not a positive choice for a team trying to move forward (same old, same old)

Although it's only one game, it will be interesting to see if today's action sees the same type of high scores.

I have been trying to work out who are the likely instigators of bias in EPL and the only group that I think that can most benefit are shady underworld types involved in betting syndicates who often try to influence the outcome of games worldwide.

i can see wot you mean ice, there all like minded and all the same type player, evenin how easily they get injured, its mad... but im not sure where we would put def minded players in a system that has served us wel thus far, i just think the players we hav did nt work hard enough to getbehind the ball yesterday and alot of it was left to song whod been on intern duty and had travelled halfway round the world to get home, like i said i was hugely dissapointed with nasri, ros and ramsey who i felt did nt put in a shift worthy of beating such a resolute opponent, even AW was exasperated after the game and offered no excuse just that you cant expect to win games / leagues on this performance... when we go down i these games its always the same, with a whimper... there were 15 mins left when we conceded and you could be sure utd and chelsea woulda got their equaliser but we simply cant re-raise our game when wer only going through the motions in these games

In this type of bet, there is no spread to beat, your team needs only to win the game «straight up» (SU), and there is no requirement for how many points they need to win by.

It was exactly the type of stage Sanchez was signed for — a big name brought in to do it in the big games — but in the end he only contributed to what was a shocking failure.

Nor is it known, definitively, whether different types of points were associated with only certain groups of people, or whether with the same groups used certain point types to specialize on particular kinds of game or hunting practices.

Because not only do we have many different types of games, we are also getting more and more games that can actually help?

Two years ago, The Cut wrote of how Game of Thrones «Daenerys Targaryen was the mother of not only dragons, but also fashion's renewed obsession with the type of tops «social mores demand that you hang up... once you stop taking Jägerbombs and start contributing to a 401K.»

am a very straight kind of person looking looking for a very serious relationship that can end up to something very good and lets build family i want a honest kind and truthful type of man only no game player

up front man what you see is what you get looking for someone to get to know and hopeful meet the right woman to spend my life with tired of games want a family also I am a vet of the gulf war love lazy Sunday's so to speak I am a very sexual type of man but ONLY with the woman I am with

I am a regulare gamer i doesn't keep to only one game, i play multi types of games.

Play a game Interweaving the relative time scale with the atomic time scale poses certain problems because only certain types of rocks, chiefly the igneous variety

When I first started the game after only having played a few of the 2D Metroid games I kind of enjoyed the tank controls, because it gave me a very similar feel to how Samus controlled in those 2D games (like how you had to stop moving to be able to aim in the 3D space in front of you), but as I continued I quickly realized that this control scheme does not work well for the type of game that Metroid: Prime is.

And the fact that they've said «The game play is horrible» is because all they're A fat no life xboxlive only playing call of duty type of person.

The rest of the time is spent exploring (only you can't in any type of satisfying manner because after 10 seconds you've got the pointless button pressing combat again) some terribly badly designed maps (on roughly the same tech and inspirational level as Horace Goes Skiing - seriously that lost world of dinosaurs game on the Spectrum 128K had way, way better level design), following a story line that is so shallow it makes Jet Set Willy look like story telling genius, buying weapons and armour and levelling up which is all pointless because the combat is just so useless.

I know that Manhunter and Suffering are not the same «type» of game but how did this get such a high rating??? The only good thing is I bought this for only 6 to 7 bucks... I guess its worth that.

The only real game changer are the Colossi, as a ship type, a handful of perks, and a boring mid-game crisis are hardly worthy of an expansion pack.

The only mode I do nt think works well for this particular type of game is FFA, it just does nt flow well with the way the species are and it can be hindered by those trying to run around and do nothing but a stealth kill.

Dark Souls 2 seems like it wants to be enjoyed by only a select type of player (aggressive PvP junkies and griefers) and is less of a game for it.

IMO its for those who know / have experienced the type of game only.

A list of negative things I can say without even hesitating in typing, no leg TKO's or TKO animations, take downs are so bad (like really bad) the ground game is easy to get out of and watching someone use it effectively and correct is ugly, bad animations and robotic strikes, the stamina system is non existent unless you decide to swing for the fences, which you can throw 6 or 7 hooks or head kicks before getting tired, but don't worry, you are only tired for 3 seconds.

Rare have thrown out the notion of character progression, you can only pick your avatar from a randomly generated lineup, there's no overarching story, no real end goal outside of becoming Legendary, and the few types of quest in the game are merely there to feed the delights and monstrosities of human interactions.

Instead, the story dictates which types of characters you have at your disposal at any one time, only allowing you to customize in the back half of the game.

Melee in this game is void of skill, it is nearly 100 % stat based and you can simply quick swing, power swing or block and the different swings only differences are damage and time taken to execute which in combat comes down to can i take him down with one or two hard hits or do i need to block a bit and beat him down piece by piece there is no dodging to counteract your possibly poor block skill or lack of shield there is no need to understand enemy attacks either they will hurt you if they hit you or if you block it it will hurt alittle or almost as much as normal and with spells and archery its all relevant the spells do elemental damage so the enemy is either resistant, weak, or neutral to a spells type not to mention that every spell has its different element counterpart.

Nice graphics boring gameplay killing few thousands of already dead guys isn't very fun.I like the weapons trough they are the same from the original painkiller just under other skin with some new additions.The backdraw of the game: The long, very long.excruciating long loading time almost 10 minutes.The only thing that might make you wana play the same level again is the tarot card you get after finishing a level.I like the boss battles but in rest is pretty boring just the locations are varied.The enemies are not 40 types how it might look but just 4 types.They all want the same and do the same.tones of insignificant AI which comes in front and try to crack open youre skull.I got one!!!

The only reason I can think that anyone would buy Implosion is if they straight up need this type of action game on their Switch.