Sentences with phrase «only get their work published»

Not exact matches

To be successful at marketing your product or business you not only have to work to get your content shared across the Internet, but you also have to reach out to journalists who can write about you or even publish your work.

Since I've only been focused on getting my works published in printed magazines thus far, I'm shifting my efforts to increasing my blog traffic.

So, first, congratulations, because I am only just beginning to see how much work this is going to be and I guess my question is, how do you get published?

All of which matters, he acknowledges, only to the extent that it helps him get the work done: It's publishing papers that ultimately counts, Pakkala says.

Van der Heyden isn't the only European researcher to get such a hard sell from Pan European Networks (PEN), a 6 - year - old publishing company with offices in Congleton, U.K., and Brussels that promises to provide opportunities for «leading figures from across Europe» to get attention for their work or ideas.

Once upon a time the only way to get published was to enlist an agent and publishing house to do the work for you.

It doesn't matter if out of 1000 self - published only 10 are good, you're still advocating that those 10 do not exist nor have the right to have their readers call them Authors (and prefer their work to the drivels that get published today)

Announcing (and I don't doubt her) that the only way to get back to her own creative work was to put what she's learned about marketing into a book — there were questions from her fans everywhere but in her fortune cookies, apparently — she has, indeed, published the mercifully explicit title, How To Market a Book.

If the above is not interesting for you, or if you are only now venturing into self publishing your work, forget about Lightning Source, you'll get lost soon.

I know I'm going to make some people mad when I say this, but 95 % of the authors who self - publish or work with a vanity press only do so... because they don't know how to get a real publisher (or they're afraid they won't be able to).

And in traditional publishing for the last sixty - plus years, the only game in town was to form a partnership through a contract with an established publisher to get your work to readers.

Randomly stumbled upon this tonight and I see most of the comments are now years old... but in response to your last comment Tracy about how you know at least some writers that make $ 1,000 a day by writing longer works... out of curiosity, are these writers publishing dozens of books to get to that level or did they just find the right niche and only have to publish a few books to get to that level?

Yes, going wide would be more stable and I could probably build up the income — but it takes more work and managing, and it's much harder without a large body of work (I still have only a handful of books, when I get to 20 I might start publishing differently).

It is hard to believe that tighter controls on uploaded material can not be put into place, but with the sheer volume of books being published in e-reader format, often by the authors themselves who have opted to break away from the traditional publishing model in order to have more control over their work, e-book piracy may only get worse.

I firmly believe that authors grow stronger when they unite and work together, a prospect that — like indie publishing itself — only gets easier with new and better technologies.

They also shared some invaluable advice on how to get work published with indie presses, and I thought it only right to share it with you all.

Only FIFTEEN PERCENT of one of the major online publisher's authors have managed (or bothered) to even get 1 review of the book they worked so hard to write and then threw into a machine to publish.

When authors pay to get their books reviewed, they don't pay to have a good review published, but only an honest opinion about their work.

Well, we have all heard the nightmare stories of people sending their first manuscripts to their friends for reviewing only to find out that they are frenemies and see their works get published under a different name.

Not only is it possible for our entrepreneurial authors to get books to market far, far faster than traditional publishing does it (although many, alas, are cutting corners in editing, design, and other critical areas), but the going wisdom in terms of online discoverability is that one must have many works available, basically flooding the market with content.

Agents not only find the most appropriate houses and editors for a romance book, but they work to negotiate publishing house contracts in order to get the best advance possible for the author.

Their blog, bookworks.com, is fantastic, helpful and the entire BookWorks team works really hard to get out only the best and most helpful information on self - publishing.

What if I did all that work, suffered all the slings and arrows of years of rejection, only to finally get a book published and have it met by utter silence?

Because at the end of the day, no matter how many distributors authors have courted to get their works published, only the ones that sell will be cherished and respected by them.

In the not so distant past, traditional publishing was the only way for authors to get their works printed and distributed with any credibility.

A writer's only alternative to getting their work to actual readers was to pay to self publish it.

If the editor has done all this work, and he thinks your book needs three pages of sex, and the only way he's going to get paid is percentage, then you just put yourself in the same position as with traditional publishing, where you have to take the chance this editor hit the vision just right and will make it better and not truncate it or castrate it.

They worked together to create an opportunity for students to not only write their own material but also be a part of the process of getting it published.

This is only an option if one of our clients decides they would like to get their work published sooner than later.

The only compelling argument I've read so far is that traditional publishers provide advances and bankroll the writing process, but that's typically only true after one has already sold some work: few are those who ever got offered great publishing deals on their first manuscript in the traditional system either.

Tanith Lee Was An Indispensible Fantasy Author — As you may already have heard, Tanith Lee died on Sunday; she was only 67, and was still writing, despite the fact that she could not get any of her recent work published (see her own explanation below).

I only have a few short stories up, having spent the last couple of years working to get better at writing novels, but I can see some self - published authors are worried.

«When I started writing, there was really only one way to get published — you worked with a traditional publisher.»

nor only would it make MGS - EA the largest game company in the world, but the biggest to publish other smaller devs work when next gen games get even more expensive.and we know EA's thoughts are to beat ubisoft, activision and any other large upcoming threat.

Because of this tie to UWP, users of the new program will not have full access to the Xbox One's power; for that they'll need to get access to a hardware - based SDK which can only be accessed via ID@Xbox (the company's indie - foccussed self - publishing initiative) or by working with a publisher.

His only extended piece of writing on his work, Early Influences, Late Consequences or: How did the Monkeys Get into my Work and Other Icono - Biographical Questions, published in 1976 and printed in the catalogue of his first museum survey, was a parody and, as it turned out, ghostwritten anywork, Early Influences, Late Consequences or: How did the Monkeys Get into my Work and Other Icono - Biographical Questions, published in 1976 and printed in the catalogue of his first museum survey, was a parody and, as it turned out, ghostwritten anyWork and Other Icono - Biographical Questions, published in 1976 and printed in the catalogue of his first museum survey, was a parody and, as it turned out, ghostwritten anyway.

What I care about is this kind of work gets published and publicised to the detriment of science certainly, but particularly, to the detriment of the general public who are being screwed not only by draconian legislation and theft taxes on the back of it, but by the dumbing down of science education for the masses which is what created it in the first place.

Nothing is or can be «suppressed» by some conspiratorial coterie; but only work of reasonable quality and veracity tends to get through the peer review filter and be published in reputable journals.

He's got no published articles in the * mathematics * literature, he's only qualification is, afaik, an undergraduate * journalism * degree, and never worked in the field.

lolwot, in the past was: if you don't give 10 % to the church, St. Peter will get angry and will sent hailstorms and create floods; after Darwin published his book — the shonky scientists started with GLOBAL warmings and ice ages to scare the people — only now because of electronic media and communication technology — they are more loud — but the scare tactic doesn't work; because people are not buying the new socialist religion of worshiping the CO2: http://globalwarmingdenier.wordpress.com/q-a/

Client comments as published in the legal directories and guides include: «A first - class mind and clearly a silk in the making»; «a QC in waiting»; «a very bright, uber - responsive, rising star»; «formidable advocate able to stand up to commercial silks and senior juniors»; «an extremely impressive and effective advocate who gets on top of things extremely fast and is quick on his feet»; «complete grasp of all current developments, strategic input and forceful yet polite cross-examination»; «undoubted star junior who goes well past the extra mile in preparing his cases»; «brilliant, completely committed to the brief; a great all - rounder»; «intellectually very strong»; «very sharp and to the point»; «ringing endorsements from the market»; «impressive and knows his stuff»; «razor sharp legal skills»; «comes up with extremely clever points» with an ability «to handle hearings with utmost self - possession and confidence and produce some first - class advocacy»; «a thorough and thoughtful advocate who has an agreeable but tough courtroom manner»; «very proactive and, once instructed, takes control of a case and pushes it forward to the advantage of the client»; «has the ability to sift through complex legal problems, and present practical legal solutions that not only win you the battles, but also the war»; «very commercial and savvy»; «infectious passion for the law»; «his commitment to his work is outstanding»; «relentless energy and precise attention to detail make him invaluable.»

To the employer: publishing a detailed description of the job position an employer wants to fill is the first step to getting the best person for the job — it enables potential candidates to screen themselves so that only those with the required qualifications, abilities and competence, and who are prepared mentally, psychologically, and physically to perform the listed tasks or duties and work cordially with other people whose job functions will relate with them can apply for the job.

Track record of only allowing accurate information to be published, working closely with internal professionals on project specifications and developing workflow channels that get the job done.