Sentences with phrase «only given examples»

I can only give you the example of RVP and what that cost the club to get one good season from him.

Any way I was only giving an example on Lacazette.

(I am not pitching here, I am only giving an example.)

Not exact matches

For example, Uber not only requires the customer to rate their driver after their ride but also has the driver give a rating to the passenger based on their behavior.

Not only do they make crucial decisions, but they influence the decisions of others, both directly through the instructions they give and indirectly through the examples they set and the atmosphere they foster.

For example, if a team is working on coming up with new product ideas, they could be given a variety of constraints to work with like «only items made from recycled materials» or «only things that weigh less than a pillow.»

While most of the examples he gave are very obviously clickbait («He Put Garlic In His Shoes Before Going To Bed And What Happens Next Is Hard To Believe»), Mosseri admits that many headlines are less clear cut, which is why it's important that Facebook will only punish sites that post a high ratio of bad headlines.

Let me give you an example: being a SaaS from Eastern Europe with only 3 employees and just a big dream hasn't given us too many options:)

Just consider the financial risks entrepreneurs run, for example, if they give company stock to their children as part of a long - term estate - planning strategy — only to have the IRS step in years later and challenge the claimed taxable value of the gifts.

For example, if an admin needs to restart a web server, then that's the only command they can give at that time.

Some premium tools, for example, give you access to real - time quotes that normally cost money and can only be found on premium stock trading platforms.

So for example, if you gave $ 100 and received something valued at $ 25, you can only deduct $ 75.

For example, if you set a 50 pip trailing stop on the EURUSD, the stop will not move up until your position is in your favor by 51 pips, and then the stop will only move again if the market moves 51 pips above where your trailing stop is, so this way you can lock in profit as the market moves in your favor while still giving the trade room to grow and breath.

Many investors believe that China is currently under - represented in global equity indices relative to its economic influence (for example, China represents roughly 17 % of global GDP, 11 % of global trade, and 9 % of global consumption but today comprises only a 3.5 % weight in the MSCI ACWI Index).1, 2 Given the size of the China A-shares market, inclusion in global indices is regarded as key to bringing China's overall representation more closely in line.

(The authors give the example of Deustche Bank, which had «only 2.5 % equity relative to their assets at the end of 2011.»)

Reports from CCN point out that: To explain the Plasma Cash model, Buterin gives the example that if a user deposits some amount of ether to a crypto exchange or any third party service, a Plasma coin would be created with the same value of ether and a unique ID that can not be merged or split.In contrast with Plasma, Plasma Cash would only require users to pay attention to the blocks that contain coins they want to keep track of:

For example, a keyword phrase may have only 20 searches a month, but that 20 may rank poorly only because no one gave the keyword a boost with serious SEO.

For example long - term traders give most weight to fundamental news and justify not paying attention to technical data as technical data only plays out in the short term.

For example, monthly positive cash flow in my first example screenshot of the spreadsheet above is only $ 1.89 given my assumptions, but $ 60 in cash has spent on CAC already.

As it happened only a couple of weeks prior to this interview Mr Rose sat with James Chanos of Kynikos Associates in whose view the US companies do not have a good history of surviving in China and he gave the example of two Investment firms which failed.

XAV — «Christ himself was baptized to show us that we all need baptism, even he needed baptism not because he was sinful or needed sins removed but to give us an example of what we need to do on this earth, and not only did he get baptized but he did it at the hands of john the baptist who held the authority to baptize at that time.»

Of course this is only a couple of examples and sources, and i know the only way this can have a true effect on people is if God wants it too, but I know the truth, and I can't just stand by and watch people blaspheme the God who gives them the very energy they require to contest these facts

For example, last year for Lent I gave up bread and wine so the only time I had these things was at communion.

I agree, but also realize that HE was good all his life to set the example for manking... Realize that HE had not a molecule of evil in HIM... Then realize that HE only was without a blemish giving us an example of how to be good in life to inherit the rewards...

And the court has given states broad immunity from being sued in any court for money damages — for example, for infringing a patent or discriminating against older or disabled state employees — even though the Constitution limits this immunity only to suits in federal court by a citizen of a different state.

At one point, for example, Carter describes beautifully the creedal portions of the Catholic belief in the sacraments, only to end by claiming that «the entire purpose of the sacraments was to give an outward sign of belief.»

You called me out as being disingenuous when I said «that as time goes on however, I'm finding things that are helping to disprove things previously held as fact among Christians», so I have provided you an example that not only wasn't it a disingenuous statement, but that I've done my homework, on both sides of the argument, and came up with something that no one has been able to give me a response with even either the slightest chance of being possible, or falling back to the old status qua of «mysterious ways» and «having faith».

Do you have a particular group of person in mind, or could you give some examples of who believe that the gospel is only «believe in Jesus for eternal life»?

These are only a few examples illustrating the many texts which give rational evidence of the creative power of Allah.

Wherever we turn to the fullest and most total expressions of modern imaginative vision, as, for example, in Blake, Proust, and Joyce, we find that a new and total world of vision is established and maintained only by way of a dissolution or reversal of our given selfhood.

As an example, we have all sat through a missions conference where the emphasis of a sermon was on the meaning of the word «Go» in Matthew 28:19, but the only call to action at the end of the message was to give more money when the plate was passed.

Example is John 3:16, «For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.»

For example, there are persons to whom it is wholly self - evident that sense data are the ultimate givens in terms of which all thought develops and who are equally convinced that the only acceptable explanation of the way things happen follows mechanical models.

One might well question, at this point, the validity of nonreligious interpretation, asking whether Bonhoeffer has given us any example of non-religious interpretation rather than speaking only of its importance.

But slavery is only an image, an emblem, an example of the more general problem: how to actualize on this earth the great religious and moral insights that have been given to us.

To give an example: The Church may change and adapt to modern life certain principles of her human law according to which a Catholic must marry; but only a person of little theological knowledge would draw the conclusion that the Church could ever abolish the indissolubility of the sacramental consummated marriage if only there were enough protests.

I will really only be able to present a framework and then give some examples from Scripture.

Forgiveness is a two - way street and can be received only by someone who is repentant; the example given of Simon Wiesenthal's encounter with the dying SS Nazi might be a case in point.

I am not saying that the bible doesn't contain many examples of telling the faithful to dig deeper, to study more & grow closer to God through the study of the scriptures, but it NEVER says «Go ahead and study what other religions have to offer because it will only give you stronger faith in the bible».

17 ff., clearly had pointed significance in Israel after the establishment of Jerusalem as the capital by David and the building of Solomon's temple (Salem, v. 18, = Jerusalem; Melchizedek is not only king, but «priest of the God most high» to whom Abraham gives «a tenth of everything») The later Temple tax (tithe = tenth) is here given ultimate precedent and example in Abraham.

Lest the reader suppose that only classical authors can be faulted for Scripture - twisting, let me hasten to give an example of it in the most avant - garde liberal theology at the present time.

It is only by inserting a contingent statement — given the reality of oppression — that an unrestrictive theological statement — say, for example, that God is the subject of all change — can come to entail what I wish to call a «restrictive yet necessary statement» — that God is the God of the oppressed.

The Southern Bap's make it easy for me to explain to other trans - friends that a number of people are Christian in name only, and not followers of the example given by Jesus.

For example, in one speech Hitler said, «In this hour I would ask of the Lord God only this: that, as in the past, so in the years to come He would give His blessing to our work and our action, to our judgement and our resolution, that He will safeguard us from all false pride and from all cowardly servility, that He may grant us to find the straight path which His Providence has ordained for the German people, and that He may ever give us the courage to do the right, never to falter, never to yield before any violence, before any danger... I am convinced that men who are created by God should live in accordance with the will of the Almighty... If Providence had not guided us I could often never have found these dizzy paths... Thus it is that we National Socialists, too, have in the depths of our hearts our faith.

f) STOP HIS SPIN to show Muslims are indeed giving up terrorists hiding among them by citing examples such as the father of the Nigerian bomber who approached the FBI for help ONLY AFTER his son had made a MARTYRDOM TAPE knowing fully that THE ONE & ONLY ALTERNATIVE to see his son alive was to get him arrested.

In Process and Reality, An Essay in Cosmology 183, however, Whitehead's very similar example is presented in such a way that it is pretty clear he is thinking of the distant occasions as being given only mediately.

This is a special kind of parable, found only in Luke, in which we are given an example to imitate.

It also declares that «several violent actions motivated by religious intolerance against non-Catholics have been committed» in Bolivia» giving as its only example a stoning incident from 1949 that was, according to «some witnesses» left unnamed in a local newspaper account, instigated by a Catholic priest.

The very fact that it nowhere appearsto give a clearly comprehensible list of the sacraments, for example, but prefers to distribute them in different models, while never synthesising them simply and clearly, is surely not only inadequate doctrinally, but also unhelpful educationally for teacher and for student.

The alleged subordination of the gospel to Karl Marx is illustrated, for example, by charging that «false» liberation theology concentrates too much on a few selected biblical texts that are always given a political meaning, leading to an overemphasis on «material» poverty and neglecting other kinds of poverty; that this leads to a «temporal messianism» that confuses the Kingdom of God with a purely «earthly» new society, so that the gospel is collapsed into nothing but political endeavor; that the emphasis on social sin and structural evil leads to an ignoring or forgetting of the reality of personal sin; that everything is reduced to praxis (the interplay of action and reflection) as the only criterion of faith, so that the notion of truth is compromised; and that the emphasis on communidades de base sets a so - called «people's church» against the hierarchy.