Not exact matches
While this manuscript was in preparation, a similar episomal strategy was used to reprogram
human primary fibroblasts using a distinct pluripotent cocktail of factors, validating our methods, but with significant lower efficiency (
only 3 to 6 colonies / 106
input cells)[42].
thats total bull, regardless of what people say, 60 fps is not just about how smooth the game looks, it also makes a massive difference in how the game feels, some people may not be able to notice between 30 an 60 fps, but most will be able to feel the difference, an the
human eye an defo see it, but most gamers, do nt know or understand it, an so do nt notice it, but the eye can see it, for games, 60 fps is the holy grail, when console games are standard 60 fps, native 1080p, then an
only then will we be in gaming nirvana, LOL but serious, i agree with u that if a game is locked at a constant 30 fps, then most times thats fine, for not for a racer, an for a sim racer is even worse, 60 fps makes the
input lag the shortest it can possibly be, an so makes a massive difference on how the game feels, an how responsive it is, an aslo when racing a car, 60 fps helps you feel the speed allot more then 30!
«The audience's role becomes key in Clements» work as it
only exists within the exchange between her investigation and «our»
input as
human «external sources».»
So if we can imagine a total earth -
human system (including solar
input and other extra terrestial impacts), then climate change itself might be considered a «forcing» on a very sensitive system that wreaks extreme havoc, whereas CC alone would have
only caused considerable harm.
The models currently assume a generally static global energy budget with relatively little internal system variability so that measurable changes in the various
input and output components can
only occur from external forcing agents such as changes in the CO2 content of the air caused by
human emissions or perhaps temporary after effects from volcanic eruptions, meteorite strikes or significant changes in solar power output.
The fraction of aCO2 in the atmosphere is already about 9 %, partly because the
human fraction of the
inputs did grow to 5 % (8/150 GtC) over time, partly because it accumulates over 5 years, as
only 20 % of all CO2 is exchanged per year, thus also
only 20 % of the aCO2, but
only the deep oceans exchange it with aCO2 free fresh deep ocean natural CO2, while ocean surface and vegetation give some aCO2 back in the next season.
Precisely seems we
humans are
only able to understand an issue with 2,3,4 max
inputs and need to have a main culpable.
As they stand at present the models assume a generally static global energy budget with relatively little internal system variability so that measurable changes in the various
input and output components can
only occur from external forcing agents such as changes in the CO2 content of the air caused by
human emissions or perhaps temporary after effects from volcanic eruptions, meteorite strikes or significant changes in solar power output.