Said Paine, «
The only idea man can affix to the name of God is that of a first cause, the cause of all things.»
Not exact matches
But by 2014,
only 72 % disagreed with the
idea that the
man should be the one supporting the family.
The blue pill will take you back to your cozy desk job coding for the
man, and the red pill might lead you to insomnia induced by
ideas of how to turn your startup into a real company using
only your laptop combined with some technical and marketing skills, and a realistic gameplan to pull it off.
You got my
idea now... Just remembered now a very old
man of Quran Knowledge (A Sheikh) who is expired 2 years ago
only when he visited my office and saw my laptop and what I do... he said you know son that what you are seeing or getting through your laptop we get it and see it passing in our awakening and our sleep...!!
I know what the book «
Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus» says, but not only was it poorly researched, but the idea in the title itself, since men and women both originate from God, is unscriptur
Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus» says, but not
only was it poorly researched, but the
idea in the title itself, since
men and women both originate from God, is unscriptur
men and women both originate from God, is unscriptural.
Well if it's slightly more evidence of the existence of a
man outside of Italy in the 1st century who was born of a virgin, died for 3 days before resurrecting himself, then explained he
only died because of «original sin» which is the
idea that a woman ate magical apple given from a talking snake in a garden at the beginning of time which caused all humans to go to hell when they died.
The acronym is a bit more cumbersome, but not
only is the phrase more in line with what Jesus actually wanted us to do, it is also more acceptable to the largest part of the body of Christ — those who have come to God by non-Christian paths and are uncomfortable with the
idea of equating Jesus the
man (the way Jesus looked physically) with God.
Only here (Mt 25:34) is the Son of
man called «the King,» but the
idea is implicit in references to his kingdom (Mt 13:41; 16:28; 19:28).
It might seem strange the people can simultaneously hold both
ideas mentioned above; namely, that the poor
man represents Jesus Christ on earth, and therefore all the right is on his side, and he is the
only one who must be considered; but at the same time, that poverty is a scandal, and we must do our best to get rid of this scandal and to put the poor into a «normal» situation; that is, put an end to poverty.
It was in this ardent zone of growth and universal recasting that all that makes
man what he is today was discovered — or at least must have been rediscovered, for even those things which had long been known elsewhere achieved their definitive human value
only when they were incorporated into the system of European
ideas and activities.
No
idea what it's like to have to ingratiate your self to
men who see you
only as a reservoir for their semen.
Repentance is at best
only an incentive to this turning, and it may even stand in the way of it if a
man tortures himself with the
idea that his acts of penance are not sufficient and thereby withholds his best energies from the work of reversal.
There is for them
only one God — he is holy, his land is holy, his nation is to be a holy people — and while the indiscriminate mixture of moral and ceremonial elements carries over old
ideas even while it ventures into new ones, there is an evident elevation of the
idea of holiness into terms of the divine majesty, and of the Most High's exclusive claim on
man s devotion.
, but they have
only very hazy
ideas about what the Church really says on human dignity, the value of each one of us, the beauty of human love, the value of authentic family life, the mutual companionship of
men and women.
The Bob Newhart Show turned that
idea on its head, showing a
man who was
only good at his job because of the support and wisdom he got from his marriage.
Study of Scripture through the filter of
man's biases results in the type of
man - centered
ideas proferred by Baden, like «God learns to accept their inherently evil nature», and humans «are the
only species that can give him what he wants — which, in the view of Genesis, is bloody, burned animal sacrifices», and «it is, rather, our job to make ourselves uncomfortable that he might be appeased.»
I think the
idea of
man invading another country enforcing his will on the people goes against the new testament teachings that reserve that power for God the father
only.
The
idea of God is really moral in its influence — it really cherishes all that is best and loveliest in
man —
only when God is contemplated as sympathizing with the pure elements of human feeling, as possessing infinitely all those attributes which we recognize to be moral in humanity....
Creationism is the
idea that the earth is
only about 6000 - 10000 years old and that
man was created in the exact image that they are in today.
The
idea of a God who not
only sympathizes with all we feel and endure for our fellow
men, but who will pour new life into our too languid love, and give firmness to our vacillating purpose, is an extension and multiplication of the effects produced by human sympathy.
It can thus mislead one to the opinion that God is an «
idea» which
only through
men becomes «reality» and further to the hopelessly perverted conception that God is not, but rather becomes — in
man or in mankind.
The original settlements were composed of all
men (to develop this land into a business endeavor), and
only after a couple of failed settlements composed of all
men did the
idea of sending entire families across the water come about.
God, transcendent and immanent, above all yet in all; God, forthgoing in the sublime and challenging character of Christ; God, no abstract essence
only, but the Spirit who can strengthen us with might in the inner
man, so that, as Paul dared say, we «may be filled with all the fullness of God» — if one is going to believe in God at all, what richer, more comprehensive, and sustaining
idea and experience of him can one imagine than that?
The Christian
ideas of God as loving father and the oneness of all
men under him have an effect on one's life
only if they become essential ingredients in one's convictions, at the nucleus of one's being, about the meaning of existence.
Divine initiative, together with the ontological and epistemological distance assumed between
man and God, is a correlate of the
ideas of historical revelation, grace and redemption; the gulf can
only be bridged from the side of the divine.
The Church is still against birth control, and has this
idea in the complemantary gender role basically women should be quiet, pop babies and
man should
only lead in the Church and work.
After much study, prayer and thought I am convinced that the
idea that
only men are allowed to teach scripture, be a pastor, be an elder etc. etc. was a teaching that came about due to the status of women during a particular time and culture and continued because of the patriarchal system that most churches have continued to operate under.
To be sure, Kant is in no way interested in the historicity of Christ: «this
man, the
only one pleasing to God,» is an
Idea.
Thus the meaning of the Beatitudes is approached philosophically
only by the
idea of a nonanalytic liaison between the work of
man and the contentment susceptible of satisfying the desire which constitutes his existence.
«Occam, and following him Biel, thought out the
idea, without precedent in tradition, that justification, properly speaking, consists
only in the acceptance of
man by God, and that this acceptance in itself is independent of any change in the person justified... that God could also «justify» the sinner and leave him in his sin.»
Mark came to realize that he resisted June's pushiness not
only because it didn't fit his
idea of what a woman «ought» to be, but also because it reinforced his feeling of not being a «real
man.»
In discussions with Greeks, Christian thinkers presented the new faith not
only by reference to the Scriptures but also by appeal to classical literature and general conceptions, «common
ideas» that they shared with other educated
men and women.
But these
men are important historically in a third way: not
only their results and their methods but the philosophical interpretations of their
ideas had a major impact on Western thought.
It is not
only mental activity, clear logic, or more persistent thinking that is needed in order to conceive these
ideas radically; for the concepts of sin and grace have their origin not in theoretical reflection, they are the expression of
man's experience that the reality of his own existence is determined by sin and grace.
Instead of the Power whom
man obeys and for whom he decides, he knows
only the law of his own spiritual being, and the
idea of God becomes «the irreducible coefficient of moral processes in self - consciousness.»
I have no
idea why women would worship a being that is said to say that women are property at worst and at best are second class citizens not worthy of this god, which
only can communicate with
men.
The
idea that there must be a perfect society, some form of the «good life» binding on all of us» the myth of an ideal world»
only really begins to lose its hold on us in the thought of
men such as Vico and Herder.
It is
only a lack of imagination on the part of some students which has prevented them from seeing the grand sweep of the sacrificial
idea and has therefore led them to a rejection of it as central to the religious life of
man.
Altizer uses this
idea, but
only as the ultimate goal of a dialectical process that has already emptied the transcendent God into
man and cosmos and will eventually pour every opposite into a final identity.
Human affliction, especially the monstrous inhumanity of
man to
man, was to them a practical, rather than a theoretical, problem; it represented not
only a conflict of
ideas but a conflict of individual and class interests, a struggle for justice in personal character or social organization against selfishness, ill will, and inequity.
The more concrete objects of most
men's religion, the deities whom they worship, are known to them
only in
idea.
Well I have no
idea what denomination interprets the passage correctly (either way,
only telling the women in the congregation to shut up and not
men is degrading to women).
Indeed, no one has more fiercely criticized our established
ideas and symbols of God than Whitehead himself, and apparently the wrath of this gentle
man was aroused
only by
ideas of God.
The way this «male» aspect of the language influences our
ideas of reality is therefore bound to be destructive, not
only to the female self - concept but also to the ease with which
men are able to relate to women outside the sexual or dependent role.
This delusional
idea that the world was to end yesterday reminds exactly of the stupidity that I see everyday when I step out of my house and have to deal with the hypocrisy of America and that silly white
man who thinks he's above everyone else just like Harold Camping believed in this ridiculous
idea that the world would end and
only the good would go to heaven, trust me, all white people think the same way this guy did!
I hope that people generate some new
ideas that do not use fear to motivate people into action to help your fellow
man to save the earth our one and
only home.
The whole notion of sin is myth for
man as such, not
only for modern
man, for he regards the whole
idea of God as myth and the whole
idea of God incarnate in Christ as myth.
Jesus speaks of property
only as he does of wealth, that it becomes a fetter to
man; that property can be used otherwise than for one's own enjoyment, that is, for service to the common good, as when it serves as a means of production — this
idea is completely outside the thought of Jesus, and can well remain so.
Marx says that Hegel
only takes account of
man's mental activities, i.e., of his
ideas, and that these, though important, are by themselves insufficient to explain social and cultural change.
The
idea of historical or special revelation means, it seems to me, not
only that God acts in history but also that there is a history of the acts of disclosure of God whereby the character of existence is progressively revealed to
man.