Not exact matches
Those are the
only changes that will
increase access to justice.
While it could be argued that wholesale distribution of law will create more retail (free or low cost) legal information distribution points and thus
increase access to justice — indeed, it would solve many of the closed problems of legal information that I listed above — I'm now not entirely convinced that this is the
only way
to go for state government publication efforts.
Speedy resolution is not
only better for the parties (and not just in family law disputes) but it also
increases access to justice, because more disputes get resolved better at less cost per dispute.
Providing
access to justice to people who need legal advice can
only increase with providing incentives for said people.
This not
only allows us
to recruit and retain world - class talent, it also leads
to exciting and unexpected breakthroughs, and EVA is a collection of these breakthroughs that our engineers wanted
to spin off in order
to both
increase affordable
access to justice and
to give back
to the larger legal technology community.
More than two - thirds of 165 experts surveyed by Bond Solon think the reforms will fail
to achieve their goal of
increasing access to justice, and
only six per cent thought
access would be improved.
Of course, the voices demanding
increased access to justice and responsiveness
to the needs of society are
only getting louder.
[5] While there is evidence
to support the claim that
only legal aid and / or pro bono will actually
increase access to justice, there is no evidence
to support that programs like the LLLT program will.
Instead, the authors consider whether limited - scope representation (like unbundled services or a lawyer stepping in at
only one point in the case) really help
increase access to justice.
The need for accurate and accessible information will
only increase as more people start
to advocate for
increased access to the
justice system for victims and communities.
Since Alberta
increased its small claims court limits in 2013, concerns about
access to justice and about self - represented litigants have
only increased.
Others still championed LSPs as important for meeting the
access to justice gap, but argued against their regulation by state courts on the grounds either it is unnecessary (they are already regulated by consumer protection laws), that it would unnecessarily
increase costs, or that regulation would
only enable the state bars and courts
to exercise their «protectionist instincts» (see this response, this response and this response).
This will dramatically reduce
access to justice for the most deprived members of society, whilst savage cuts
to the criminal legal aid budget can
only increase the risk of miscarriages of
justice.
[98] Some respondents championed LSPs as important for meeting the
access to justice gap, but argued against their regulation by state courts on the grounds either it is unnecessary (they are already regulated by consumer protection laws), that it would unnecessarily
increase costs, or that regulation would
only enable the state bars and courts
to exercise their «protectionist instincts.»
This is relevant not
only to highlight the need for changes
to the mainstream legal system in order
to improve Aboriginal women's
access to justice and
increase social harmony within Aboriginal communities.