hahaha, I'm pretty sure they'd find all the faults in my cooking if I were showing this to judges, but thankfully,
the only judge in this case = my own tastebuds!
Not exact matches
The maximum potential sentences
in this
case are prescribed by Congress and are provided here for informational purposes
only, as any sentencing of the defendant will be determined by the
judge.
Under
Judge Salisbury's reasoning
in the Massachusetts AG's
case, Massachusetts must
only show Equifax misled consumers
in order to seek damages on their behalf.
The federal
judge overseeing the
case in Texas against the Department of Labor's fiduciary rule on Wednesday denied considering all but two of the eight amicus briefs filed
in the court, allowing
only the briefs filed by the Financial Planning Coalition and the American Association for Justice.
As my PaidContent colleague Jeff John Roberts reported last month, Harris» attempt to have this court order struck down failed for a somewhat unusual reason: namely, the
judge hearing the
case decided that Harris did not have any legal interest
in the tweets he sent, because such rights
only apply to things a user actually owns — and users do not own their tweets for the purposes of the U.S. Constitution.
Thus
in either
case the judgment is pronounced upon man not from the human standpoint, as if man» s value were somehow immanent and securely possessed by him, but from without — according to Jesus, of course, God is the
only Judge.
That wasn't even Olson's
case, but with assists from a federal district court
judge who came out as being
in a same - sex relationship
only after ruling and retiring, and elected officials who chose to forgo their traditional duty to vigorously defend state law, Olson and Boies did succeed
in disenfranchising millions of Californians on a procedural technicality.
By the word of God we define: The Easterners can not complain against the Patriarch to western Patriarchs; that every
case that can not be settled
in his presence must await the judgement of Christ... (and) on no grounds whatever one can think or say that the Catholicos of the East can be
judged by those who are below him, or by a Patriarch equal to him he himself must be the
judge of all those beneath him, and he can be
judged only by Christ who has chosen him, elevated him and placed him at the head of his church.
In the
case of religious expression, having a government authority like a school district abuse their authority by forcing the graduating class to listen to
only one religious viewpoint and prayer is reprehensible from a legal standpoint regardless of what corrupt
judge you find to rule differently.
This man» a former official of the Second Republic (the previous civilian government, overthrown by the military
in 1983) who was once imprisoned by the current regime» told me that
in many places
in the north, where he often tries
cases, Nigerian civil law has become a dead letter:
judges regularly turn
cases over to the sharia courts even if
only one party to the
case is a Muslim.
Democratic theory requires that a
judge set the majority's desires at naught
only in accordance with a superior law —
in our
case, the written Constitution.
You're very funny bro.Yet why is that upon all these stats why do I get the feeling that if top teams
in the world were given the chance to sign
only one of an
in form Wilshere and
in form Walcott both at their best everyone will be going for Wilshere.I keep telling people that even some of the players we rate as world class are useless
in so many stats.For example some players you rate over some players might have inferior stats as compared to the ones you don't rate.I'd be happy if people would use stats to.compare players always as you do here instead of using their eyes to
judge in some
cases and use stats to justify themselves
in some
cases.
Only those who appeal against removal will have their
case heard by a
judge and even then it will be an immigration
judge at a tribunal, not
in a criminal court.
For example,
judges can
only grant some
cases be heard
in criminal courts under «extraordinary circumstances» — a term that wasn't defined.
In court, Mr. Hart told Judge Firetog that the elder Mr. Sharpe and Mr. Parker were not only political rivals but also opponents in legal case
In court, Mr. Hart told
Judge Firetog that the elder Mr. Sharpe and Mr. Parker were not
only political rivals but also opponents
in legal case
in legal
cases.
«Jurors may have their own ideas about him or about politicians
in general that may inform their view of the
case, notwithstanding the
judge's instructions to decide this
case only on the facts at hand,» Ms. Rodgers continued.
This means that any extension would not
only be: - subject to a specific
case being made by the Director of Public Prosecutions; - subject every seven days up to the agreed limit to the approval of a High Court
Judge; - subject to the regular report of the independent reviewer with an annual debate
in parliament; - but also be subject
in each and every instance to a specific parliamentary notification procedure, to a further statement to parliament on the individual
case, a review on the specific
case by the independent reviewer and with the provision for this House to scrutinise and debate the report and all the circumstances.
We are also proposing for consultation - and this would not require a state of emergency - an extension of the current limit for up to 28 days more or a lesser period — but
only if,
in addition to the requirement that a
judge must approve every single seven day extension, the
case is itself is notified to parliament and subject to a timely report to parliament of all circumstances, with the option of a later parliamentary debate.
But the 83 - year - old was
only sentenced to 15 months
in jail by Preston's recorder,
Judge Anthony Russell, and Grieve stepped
in today to personally make the
case for a harsher sentence at the court of appeal this morning.
The
judge noted that the claimant has the right to sue the first defendant but can
only be suspended when found wanting
in House rule 37 to 39 which is not related to the
case in view.
Ms Richards may
only bring court
cases in future with the prior approval of a
judge after failed actions against MI5, MI6, the Metropolitan police and the Army among others.
Ulster County has the second highest volume of Supreme Court
cases in the district and yet has
only one locally based trial
judge.
In December 2014, several weeks after a
judge agreed to release the researchers, the U.S. attorney's office dropped the charges entirely, citing
only its «on - going evaluation and assessment of this
case.»
In lifting the desegregation order governing the public schools in Muscogee County, Ga., federal Judge J. Robert Elliott noted that he was the only person who had had a continuous connection with the case since it was filed in 196
In lifting the desegregation order governing the public schools
in Muscogee County, Ga., federal Judge J. Robert Elliott noted that he was the only person who had had a continuous connection with the case since it was filed in 196
in Muscogee County, Ga., federal
Judge J. Robert Elliott noted that he was the
only person who had had a continuous connection with the
case since it was filed
in 196
in 1964.
Since then, a high - profile court battle ensued, resulting
in a Superior Court
judge finding that the program violates the state's constitutional mandate to use public funds
only for public schools — but thanks to a Court of Appeals ruling last month, the state must disburse school vouchers that have already been awarded while the
case winds its way through the state appellate courts.
The
judge in the
case used student test score based evaluations as the
only stated rationale
in his ruling.
(cont'd)- I'm giving away hundreds of listings on the Vault, and as a result of doing so, won't see one thin dime of income on the site until October or later - Given all the time and money I've already sunk into developing the site, I don't even expect to earn back my upfront investment until sometime next year - I'm already personally reaching out to publishers on behalf of authors who are listed
in the Vault, on my own time and my own long distance bill, despite the fact that I don't stand to earn so much as a finder's fee if any of those contacts result in an offer - I make my The IndieAuthor Guide available for free on my author site and blog - I built Publetariat, a free resource for self - pubbing authors and small imprints, by myself, and paid for its registration, software and hosting out of my own pocket - I shoulder all the ongoing expense and the lion's share of administration for the Publetariat site, which since its launch on 2/11 of this year, has only earned $ 36 in ad revenue; the site never has, and likely never will, earn its keep in ad revenue, but I keep it going because I know it's a valuable resource for authors and publishers - I've given away far more copies of my novels than I've sold, because I'm a pushover for anyone who emails me to say s / he can't afford to buy them - I paid my own travel expenses to speak at this year's O'Reilly Tools of Change conference, nearly $ 1000, just to be part of the Rise of Ebooks panel and raise awareness about self - published authors who are strategically leveraging ebooks - I judge in self - published book competitions, and I read the * entire * book in every case, despite the fact that the honorarium has never been more than $ 12 per book — a figure that works out to less than $.50 per hour of my time spent reading and commenting In spite of all this, you still come here and elsewhere to insinuate I'm greedy and only out to take advantage of my fellow author
in the Vault, on my own time and my own long distance bill, despite the fact that I don't stand to earn so much as a finder's fee if any of those contacts result
in an offer - I make my The IndieAuthor Guide available for free on my author site and blog - I built Publetariat, a free resource for self - pubbing authors and small imprints, by myself, and paid for its registration, software and hosting out of my own pocket - I shoulder all the ongoing expense and the lion's share of administration for the Publetariat site, which since its launch on 2/11 of this year, has only earned $ 36 in ad revenue; the site never has, and likely never will, earn its keep in ad revenue, but I keep it going because I know it's a valuable resource for authors and publishers - I've given away far more copies of my novels than I've sold, because I'm a pushover for anyone who emails me to say s / he can't afford to buy them - I paid my own travel expenses to speak at this year's O'Reilly Tools of Change conference, nearly $ 1000, just to be part of the Rise of Ebooks panel and raise awareness about self - published authors who are strategically leveraging ebooks - I judge in self - published book competitions, and I read the * entire * book in every case, despite the fact that the honorarium has never been more than $ 12 per book — a figure that works out to less than $.50 per hour of my time spent reading and commenting In spite of all this, you still come here and elsewhere to insinuate I'm greedy and only out to take advantage of my fellow author
in an offer - I make my The IndieAuthor Guide available for free on my author site and blog - I built Publetariat, a free resource for self - pubbing authors and small imprints, by myself, and paid for its registration, software and hosting out of my own pocket - I shoulder all the ongoing expense and the lion's share of administration for the Publetariat site, which since its launch on 2/11 of this year, has
only earned $ 36
in ad revenue; the site never has, and likely never will, earn its keep in ad revenue, but I keep it going because I know it's a valuable resource for authors and publishers - I've given away far more copies of my novels than I've sold, because I'm a pushover for anyone who emails me to say s / he can't afford to buy them - I paid my own travel expenses to speak at this year's O'Reilly Tools of Change conference, nearly $ 1000, just to be part of the Rise of Ebooks panel and raise awareness about self - published authors who are strategically leveraging ebooks - I judge in self - published book competitions, and I read the * entire * book in every case, despite the fact that the honorarium has never been more than $ 12 per book — a figure that works out to less than $.50 per hour of my time spent reading and commenting In spite of all this, you still come here and elsewhere to insinuate I'm greedy and only out to take advantage of my fellow author
in ad revenue; the site never has, and likely never will, earn its keep
in ad revenue, but I keep it going because I know it's a valuable resource for authors and publishers - I've given away far more copies of my novels than I've sold, because I'm a pushover for anyone who emails me to say s / he can't afford to buy them - I paid my own travel expenses to speak at this year's O'Reilly Tools of Change conference, nearly $ 1000, just to be part of the Rise of Ebooks panel and raise awareness about self - published authors who are strategically leveraging ebooks - I judge in self - published book competitions, and I read the * entire * book in every case, despite the fact that the honorarium has never been more than $ 12 per book — a figure that works out to less than $.50 per hour of my time spent reading and commenting In spite of all this, you still come here and elsewhere to insinuate I'm greedy and only out to take advantage of my fellow author
in ad revenue, but I keep it going because I know it's a valuable resource for authors and publishers - I've given away far more copies of my novels than I've sold, because I'm a pushover for anyone who emails me to say s / he can't afford to buy them - I paid my own travel expenses to speak at this year's O'Reilly Tools of Change conference, nearly $ 1000, just to be part of the Rise of Ebooks panel and raise awareness about self - published authors who are strategically leveraging ebooks - I
judge in self - published book competitions, and I read the * entire * book in every case, despite the fact that the honorarium has never been more than $ 12 per book — a figure that works out to less than $.50 per hour of my time spent reading and commenting In spite of all this, you still come here and elsewhere to insinuate I'm greedy and only out to take advantage of my fellow author
in self - published book competitions, and I read the * entire * book
in every case, despite the fact that the honorarium has never been more than $ 12 per book — a figure that works out to less than $.50 per hour of my time spent reading and commenting In spite of all this, you still come here and elsewhere to insinuate I'm greedy and only out to take advantage of my fellow author
in every
case, despite the fact that the honorarium has never been more than $ 12 per book — a figure that works out to less than $.50 per hour of my time spent reading and commenting
In spite of all this, you still come here and elsewhere to insinuate I'm greedy and only out to take advantage of my fellow author
In spite of all this, you still come here and elsewhere to insinuate I'm greedy and
only out to take advantage of my fellow authors.
The
judge in that
case, Harold Baer, not
only stated that the scanning of entire books is necessary for indexing purposes
in allowing ease of searchability, but also had strong words for the benefits that programs of this kind can have for readers as a whole, especially print disabled readers.
If the contract clauses don't show Amazon's intentional strategy at sabotaging competitors and are
only a well - thought safeguard, then the same train of thought used by the
judge in the US
case above can not be called on, mainly because Amazon has a much smaller piece of the eBook market share
in Europe than it has
in the US.
A trader, having the trading knowledge, plan to take the position at a certain place and firstly decide place of loss and if traded position goes
in favour the decision of taking profit depends upon a special formation of candles.
In this way loss will be minimum and profit maximum.ALL time graph should be on the screen with some tecnical studies i.e, bolingr, macd, rsi and 5 moving averages.15 minutes graph is the pivital graph and when a special formation of candles take place the positin is taken and profit / loss is taken again on the formation of candles.Before taking position the trader should decide, mkt is bullish or bearish, and it can be well
judged from the three period graphs, daily, weekly & monthly.I have experienced more than 70 % trades successful with big profit if not huge profit and minimum loss
in case of unsuccessful trade.Market data is a deceiving activity and up / down of price rests
only with technical machanism.
Unprejudiced and positive tests are therefore greatly needed, and these can
only be found
in show and trials under
judges who have the common interest so keenly
in view that they will allow neither friendship nor personal bias to control the awards; men who will bear ever
in mind that upon their decision will greatly depend the future reputation of the animal
in the stud, and who will therefore examine carefully each specimen before them, giving due credit to beauty and blood, but
in all
cases where possible requiring also performance were they pronounce a favorable verdict».
Judges assign a score of 1 - 10 (10 being the highest) at this time to be used
only in a
case of tie points using the breed standard.
«If we can find out how far the understanding can extend its view; how far it has faculties to attain certainty; and
in what
cases it can
only judge and guess, we may learn to content ourselves with what is attainable by us
in this state.»
Apart from the
judges who have provided guidelines
in individual
cases, the
only form of accountability has been from challenges to the scope of tower dumps fought by telecoms such as Rogers and Telus.
If someone complained about the
judge's conduct to a judicial ethics body
in Texas, the
judge would very likely receive a private reprimand or maybe if the ethics panel was particularly incensed, a public reprimand, but
only because he lost his cool on the bench, not because he required the potential juror to stick around until another suitable
case could be found.
Set
in a rural community, Kelly was clerking for the
only judge in the county, which consequently, exposed her to a wide range of
cases.
In an appeal from a
case management decision, the court should ordinarily
only interfere if the
judge at first instance has not merely preferred an imperfect solution which is different from an alternative imperfect solution which the court might or would have adopted, but has exceeded the generous ambit within which reasonable disagreement is possible.
In its 20 year history the CCRC has
only referred two
cases back to the appeal
judges on a second referral.
If you believe that «the internet» begins when the document is released by the
judge, I suggest it can
only mean that the desired publication and dissemination standard must be understood at the time it is released... and, ideally, that the
judge has taken full account of the public interest
in the details of the
case at the time the ruling is written.
First a
judge may not acknowledge the ambiguity but,
in the great adversarial tradition, make the
case that there is
only one true interpretation and they have devined it (while also discrediting the worthiness of any competing interpretation).
Instead, the
case dragged on for two years; the docket sheet has around 80 entries; both sides hired computer experts, and
in the end the
case was dismissed on summary judgment,
in a decision where the
judge spent almost 40 pages analyzing every claim made by Healthcare and dismissing it
only after rigorous and
in - depth analysis which went,
in my opinion, far beyond the call of duty.
Regarding district
judges sitting by assignment, I had the experience of having a 2 - 1 panel grant a 2254 writ
in a murder
case,
only to reverse it 2 - 1 on rehearing.
-- authored by Circuit
Judge Hurwitz [majority decision] and concurring opinion by Circuit
Judge Reinhardt; discussed
in our Oct. 10, 2015 post: District court
in Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act
case which substantially reduced fee request was reversed based upon its reliance on inapt practice area hourly rates, upon its discounts for plaintiff's attorneys not delegating tasks to associates given that
only small firms prosecuted these type of
cases, and upon its use of stale prior fee awards involving fee claimant's attorneys.
Only three days after
Judge Kaplan's spectacular ruling in the Chevron / Ecuador case, notes Paul Barrett at Business Week, «a state appellate court in California upheld a trial judge's finding that what had been billed as a watershed liability verdict against Dole Food over pesticide use in Nicaragua was actually the product of a corrupt conspiracy by plaintiffs» lawyers.&r
Judge Kaplan's spectacular ruling
in the Chevron / Ecuador
case, notes Paul Barrett at Business Week, «a state appellate court
in California upheld a trial
judge's finding that what had been billed as a watershed liability verdict against Dole Food over pesticide use in Nicaragua was actually the product of a corrupt conspiracy by plaintiffs» lawyers.&r
judge's finding that what had been billed as a watershed liability verdict against Dole Food over pesticide use
in Nicaragua was actually the product of a corrupt conspiracy by plaintiffs» lawyers.»
The
Judge concluded the
case by pointing out that the dispute demonstrated the range of possible outcomes when parties are calculating Close - Out Amounts, and the wisdom of ISDA making the changes that it did
in the 2002 Agreement — NPC illustrated the type of outcome that a party given the role of decision maker and limited
only by a requirement of rationality might press for, regardless of the fact of an actual replacement transaction.
I live
in a country
in which these
cases are put
only before professional
judges.
On the subsidiary question of whether or not he should exercise his discretion not to set aside, impliedly conferred on the court by s 339 (2) and considered at paras 26 — 28, the
judge held that such discretion as he had should
only be used
in circumstances which are «extremely rare», and Haines's
case,
in his view, was not within that category.
As Lord Heward CJ phrased
in a leading English
case on the impartiality of
judges (R v. Sussex) «not
only must justice be done, it must also be seen to be done».
Against that background, Apple
only asked for 60 cents per device from Motorola (which still seemed too much for
Judge Posner, though not for the appeals court), less than one - twentieth of its per - unit damages demand from Samsung
in the current
case,
in which Apple pursued a broader claim construction that enabled it to claim ownership of the whole feature as opposed to a particular internal architecture that can be avoided.
Only because lawyers and
judges still think of records as pieces of paper
in file drawers is it not given its necessary place
in the
case law.