Sentences with phrase «only known risk»

The only known risk factor for the condition is severe social neglect, but in the majority of cases of neglect, RAD does not develop.

Conclusion: there is no known benefit to eating animal products and only known risk, so why do it?

The only known risk factor for the majority of such patients is aging.

The only known risk factor that is common is a history of high levels of radiation.

Not exact matches

Uber's case is that the driver enters into a binding agreement with a person whose identity he does not know (and will never know) and who does not know and will never know his identity, to undertake a journey to a destination not told to him until the journey begins, by a route prescribed by a stranger to the contract [Uber] from which he is not free to depart (at least not without risk), for a fee which (a) is set by the stranger, and (b) is not known by the passenger (who only is told the total to be paid), (c) is calculated by the stranger (as a percentage of the total sum) and (d) is paid to the stranger.

Not only that, but it will make you feel so much happier and positive at work, knowing you're not in any danger or putting yourself at risk.

That means only invest in what you know, because everything else involves too much risk.

«We live in an uncertain world and face not only the risks of the known unknowns but also the unknown unknowns — the ones that we don't know we don't know,» he said.

In an age where managers are many times afraid to ask questions at the risk of being viewed as a «micro-manager,» we sometimes only know if we have a poor performer when the music stops.

Essentially our offer is that we handle the production & distribution and then share revenue with the people who help create the works for a period of time (12 months) in exchange for their work at half pay — As shoots only last a day or two max, there is very little risk for people to participate as it's a good deal and we already know everyone in the business so there is little downtime building any of the infrastructure or much less cold calling anyone

The Global Opportunity Reports aims to demonstrate that the great sustainability challenges facing societies today do not have to be seen only as risks to lifestyles and businesses as we know them.

True, it was only one quarter's information and that was not enough to change our numerical forecast of inflation, but it did lead us to conclude in our May Statement on Monetary Policy that there was no longer an upward risk to our inflation forecast.

I know why many traders don't focus enough on capital preservation and risk management: because they mistakenly think it's not «fun» or «exciting», but that's only because they aren't thinking about it right or they don't fully understand how powerful it is.

«In terms of liquidity, not only do our largest firms now have the right kind and amount of liquidity calibrated to their funding needs and to their likely run risk in stressed conditions, but they also are required to know where it is at all times and to ensure it is positioned or readily accessible where it is most likely to be needed in resolution.»

I also knew I risked only discomfort, not injury or suffering.

Not only will business leaders know who the flight risks are, they will be able to prevent many from ever becoming flight risks.»

And you might take comfort knowing risk can be mitigated by benefiting from deals structured so that continuation in a project is only contingent on meeting success milestones.

Now that we know that the only way to build real wealth, in terms of purchasing power, is by taking risk.

Because of the heightened risks, margin trading can only be conducted in a type of account known as a margin account.

«To be quick, traceable and transparent, accessible on a need - to - know basis only, with reductions of operational risks and cost reductions — add all those features together: This is what makes blockchain technology unique.»

When considering alternative investments, you should consider the fact that some products may utilize leverage and other speculative investment practices that may increase the risk of investment loss and be illiquid, are not required to provide periodic pricing or valuation information to investors, may involve complex tax structures and delays in distributing important tax information, are not subject to the same regulatory requirements as mutual funds, often charge high fees including incentive fees, and in many cases have underlying investments that are not transparent and are known only to the investment manager.

[Geeks note: To get an efficient market, assume that all traders are rational; the sort of statistical rationality that would lead everyone to interpret the same information the same way, assume that it's common knowledge they're rational (so you know that I know that you know that I'm rational, etc), that all investors» risk preferences are constant, and the only motive for trading is an expected profit.

You know how you only have to do something for a child once or twice, and it somehow turns into a tradition — a cherished family ritual that one violates only at the apparent risk of destroying all good memories of childhood?

I remember all to well being raised Catholic and being told that all those who were not Catholic ran the risk of eternal damnation... especially the protestants because their ancestors had once known the only true faith and had turned away from it.

Satan and the demons know of Christ and they tremble, i would say that is them professing Jesus Christ exist... being born again is God taking «Possession» of your heart and mind... if we simply say «just believe» we also run the risk of a head confession without the heart, and we know only God brings repentance unto salvation and not Man or any form of Man doctrine!

And this heart, this innermost centre of his person and thus of whatever else belongs to the individual, is something unique; and what is risked and given in this love is only known afterwards, when man has found him - self and truly knows what and who he actually is.

If Heidegger is right we are always dimly aware that life runs toward death, yet only in special circumstances are we able to know precisely about our own death.5 This means that every commitment in the relationship of love is made in a history with risk and uncertainty.

Paul argues that we do not have a licence to sin.because of grace If christians continue to sin and grieve the holy spirit they clearly arent walking by faith or abiding in Christ.There has to be an ongoing repentence in the christians walk that leads that person to become more like Christ.It is true that salvation is a gift of grace received by faith however the word also says that we called to walk by faith otherwise it is impossible to please God and if we love him we follow his commands not willfully disobey.If we do nt continue to abide in Christ and turn from sin then i think we can risk Christ saying to us that he never knew us.Like everything that God offers us we must meet his conditions that are only possible in Christ..

Second, we run the risk of seeing the Bible as relevant only for those forms of communication that were known in biblical times.

Thus if a society fosters only compassion at the expense of courage and enterprise, it risks becoming decadent and incapable of defending itself because it no longer fosters the virtue of courage.

If only people knew that Millet are 5 times more nutritious than the average rice varieties, has a low glycemic index (studies show they benefit type2 diabetes), cost less, cook faster, aids weight loss, reduces risk of heart disease and more!

thats the only option i see but knowing Koscielny injury concerns this season can we risk Mert, Kosc, Gab potentially playing at the same time.

it seems wenger does nt have the courage to play big... he does nt take risks... then he says he was looking at the player of the moment, or he said the same speech u already gave to us to defend something that is, for me, only stubborness and lack of diligence... about granit: do nt start with formal arguments, go to the bone, u know what i mean... u cant said xhaka was the good choise while we did nt see hin play for our colours... i hope he could be the player that we need, but nobody can said that today

but, im ok with this vardy transfer... it shows us many things: 1) wenger is changing, something some of us have been demanding for a long time; 2) it shows that wenger is taking risks: think about it, he is buying a men for a not cheap price, knowing he could not getting anything after, with a future sell i mean... this is an act that shows wengers intentions to win something, the buy is not motivated by any financial or economic reason but only for a «get the f epl once again» reason... this is an act that shows us hungry, even if we fail, we could said we try... first ever, we really try; 3) finally but very important... vardy is the kind of player we need... he is a warrior, a fighter... he has character... look at how he celebrate his goals... full of energy... he, like alexis, can motivate the team when the things are not going in our way (something wenger cant do because of his age and because he has never been an active coach on the pitch)... the vardy transfer, if it finish well, is a demostration of a change, and a good one... lets take care of winning things and do nt look the economic side for once... vardy is a bit old, but we can give a chance to welbeck after maybe, or akpom... u are not thinking about the future when we talk about ibra... guys: u complain when wenger do nt spend or because he is always looking for the bargain when u are the guys who has to pay the very expensive tickets... u complain when wenger buy the always for the future guy... like morata... stop to complain for everything and be consequent with yourself... i would love auba, but it is not going to happen... lukaku is awesome but the asking price is stupid... lets try with vardy, give us the throphy..

Obviously Arsenal are only looking for a backup to the in - form Coquelin, but no matter what his previous reputation has been, it seems to be a risk to pay that much for a player unproven in the Premier League.

Given the choice of a star who knows his limitations and the basic idea behind risk / reward and a star who knows one speed only, I'll take the former.

I don't know about the rest of you Arsenal fans, but I am still scratching my head trying to figure out just what the hell Arsene Wenger was thinking by only completing the one bargain basement transfer deal on the January window, despite the club being sat on a mountain of cash and having our best chance of the Premier League title in a decade put at risk by losing a number of key players to injury.

At the same time, you very much know it's against the rules to sell your autograph, and every time you do so, you risk getting caught doing it, especially since those you're dealing with aren't necessarily going to be of the highest moral character, and it only takes one to turn you in.

The second goal against Monaco is a perfect example — he knew he couldn't make the defensive run so it wasn't a big risk to try to pinch the ball or slow the attach in midfield; IOW, it was his only chance.

we only rented him and groomed him for someone elsewho will no doubt reap the rewards now) You get what you pay for...... some players are not risks....

Not only that, but studies by the American Academy of Pediatrics have shown a direct link between the risk of SIDS (Sudden Infant Death Syndrome) and the use of pacifiers; the reasons why aren't known exactly, but there has shown to be a direct link.

Experts recommend giving babies under 1 year old pacifiers at nap time and bedtime to reduce the risk of SIDS — but only after breastfeeding has become established, so no sooner than 3 weeks of age.

So the only way for a woman with risk factors to really know if she has chronic low milk supply is to try breast - feeding with proper technique and pumping, and see if it works.

We're not talking about examples of helicopter parenting run amok such as parents of college - age kids calling professors to argue about grades; but not supervising 9 - year - olds at all to the point that parents don't know who their friends are or what they are doing is not only opening a child up to potential risks and bad choices, but making them stressed as well.

I also found in my research that the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends to only swaddle in lightweight fabrics, no matter what time of year, to reduce the risks of overheating, which is linked to SIDS.

If they're equal (which they aren't — and that's what we know even without the release of the midwives association's statistics), then that means that even with the «low risk - ONLY» births that midwives claim to perform, midwives are more dangerous than the traditional option.

Ceiling fans not only protect your baby from overheating - a known risk factor associated with SIDS - but can also improve air circulation, whisking recently exhaled carbon dioxide up and away from your sleeping baby and showering them with cool, fresh air.

In the home birth population, however, severe pathology and very preterm pregnancies with the highest risk of mortality are underrepresented.11 12 For example in home births with known birthweight, only 1.4 % were of low birthweight.

What we don't have to wait for is knowing that breastfeeding can and does make a difference, not only with decreasing the risk of respiratory diseases and allergies but with cognitive (intellect) development as well.

It might also be interesting for our readers to know that an extensive Dutch research of 530,000 low - risk only births showed that planned home births» mortality is even lower than planned in - hostipal births» one in Netherlands.