It is important to keep in mind that the construction truck driver or their employers may not be
the only liable party.
Not exact matches
While Franklin Templeton will generally
only provide such information from, or links to, sources considered reliable, Franklin Templeton has not been involved in the preparation, adoption or editing of Third
Party Content and does not explicitly or implicitly endorse or approve such content and neither Franklin Templeton nor the Third Party Content providers guarantee its accuracy, timeliness, completeness or usefulness, and are not responsible or liable for any such content, including any advertising, products, or other materials on or available from third party s
Party Content and does not explicitly or implicitly endorse or approve such content and neither Franklin Templeton nor the Third
Party Content providers guarantee its accuracy, timeliness, completeness or usefulness, and are not responsible or liable for any such content, including any advertising, products, or other materials on or available from third party s
Party Content providers guarantee its accuracy, timeliness, completeness or usefulness, and are not responsible or
liable for any such content, including any advertising, products, or other materials on or available from third
party s
party sites.
Respondents claim that even though they are Government contractor employees, and even though they are working with highly expensive scientific equipment, and even though the Government is seeking
only information about drug treatment and information from third
parties that is standard in background checks, and even though the Government is
liable for damages if that information is ever revealed, and even though NASA's Privacy Act regulations are very protective of private information, NASA's background checks are unconstitutional.
You further acknowledge and agree that (1) any security mentioned by a third
party reflects the independent opinion of the third
party, (2) any such third -
party data or opinion is provided for your information
only, and should not be used or construed as an offer to sell, a solicitation of an offer to buy, or a recommendation by Putnam, (3) any information you receive may not be considered legal, tax, or investment advice provided by Putnam, and (4) Putnam is not
liable for any loss or damages resulting from your use of this information.
Unlike with a supplementary credit card where
only the primary borrower is legally responsible for the debt, with joint debts both
parties are fully
liable.
Recent sanction decisions in the US are not
only penalising
parties to a matter, but extend to hold attorneys professionally
liable in certain circumstances.
If you or someone you love has been injured by a defective medical device, it is beneficial for not
only you and your family, but also everyone else, to take legal action against the
liable parties.
Should you be found
liable to a lesser degree, you may be entitled to compensation, but
only to a degree proportionate to the level of fault of other
parties.
This means that the injured or damaged
party can
only recover damages if they are determined to be less than 51 % at fault, and their compensation will be reduced based on the percentage of fault they are held
liable for.
Your doctor is not the
only party that can be held
liable for failure to diagnose.
She
only needs to make a reasonable argument that the other
party was at fault and
liable for your injuries.
Therefore, when applying the section to any specific action, it is understood that joint and several liability to the plaintiff can and will attach
only to a
party defendant, although others who may also have been at fault could potentially have been found jointly and severally
liable had they been sued by the plaintiff.
Each individual claimant is also
only liable for an equal proportion of the «common» costs (being those costs which are incurred in respect of the GLO issues and not specific to any one
party), those costs typically forming the vast bulk of the legal costs involved.
Second, if the injured
party was also negligent, the original negligent
party is
only liable for the percentage of damages he or she caused.
This means you have
only 24 months from the time of your injury to file an insurance claim or personal injury suit against the
liable party.
Thus, if the injured
party was also negligent, the original negligent
party is
only liable for the percentage of damages he or she caused.
The reasons: (1) implied contractual indemnity — individual brokers were not
parties to the listing agreement with sellers (
only the bankrupt brokerage business was a
party); and (2) equitable indemnity — although brokers were jointly and severally
liable with sellers as far as buyers» damages, this theory could not be used to create a new attorney fee exposure basis under the American Rule, or else the appellate court would be creating a new exception through judicial fiat.
But if it were to be, we could end up in a nonsensical situation whereby systems integrators and outsourcers could be
liable as «sellers» for software that they obtained from third
party licensors, while such third
party licensors would at the same time continue not to be
liable as «sellers», but
only as licensors in accordance with their license agreement with the service provider or the customer.
So, if you suffered $ 100,000 in damages but were 30 % at fault for the accident, you would
only be able to recover $ 70,000 from other
liable parties.
Not
only can a truck do far more damage than a car, determining all of the
liable parties is somewhat trickier.
While a dogs owner or keeper is strictly
liable for injuries caused by their dog, a third
party can be
liable only if he or she is negligent.
What this means is each
party is
liable only for its own specified obligations.
If you have been injured in a similar Massachusetts motor vehicle accident, and a defective seat belt
only made it worse, it is in your best interest to consult with an experienced Boston personal injury lawyer to determine the strength of your claim and identify the
liable parties.
Forcing the victim to bear these losses when the victim is not to blame in a collision is not what the legislature in Illinois intended; rather, the laws in Chicago and across the state are designed to hold a responsible
party liable for the damages suffered by a victim, including medical bills, but
only if the victim seeks such a recovery.
The law is absolutely clear that an employer is not
only liable for its own acts of discrimination or harassment, but also for those of its agents and employees, and that it can also be
liable for the acts of third
parties such as customers.
If, despite the limitation above, Policybazaar or its Affiliates are found
liable for any loss or damage which arises out of or in any way connected with any of the occurrences described above, then the liability of Policybazaar and / or Its Affiliates will in no event exceed, in the aggregate, the greater of (a) the service fees you paid to Policybazaar in connection with such transaction (s) on this Site, or (b) Rupees One Hundred
only (INR 100) The limitation of liability reflects the allocation of risk between the
parties.
In recent years, third
party only insurance has become much more expensive, especially for younger drivers, because they are more
liable to have an accident and need to pay out from their policy.
(1) A
party to a marriage is
liable to maintain the other
party, to the extent that the first ‑ mentioned
party is reasonably able to do so, if, and
only if, that other
party is unable to support herself or himself adequately whether: