Sentences with phrase «only loan players»

BigGun i agree that he should stay until end of season, if he is leaving then he should only loan players in January and leave the bulk of the money to the next manager, i personally would like to see Pep Guardiola to stand in for AW because Arsenal modeled (our play) on his way of play when he was at Barca possession (tiki taca) also he has a huge following of top players he can bring to our club.

Not exact matches

Generally, community banks have been key players in small business lending, Mills said, citing data that shows community banks approved 48 percent of small business loans, while larger institutions approved only 13 percent.

One example of this process, confusingly, might even be the United States in the 1920s, as Marriner Eccles (the brilliant Federal Reserve chairman under then - president Franklin D. Roosevelt) explained endlessly to an uncomprehending elite: if all the chips at the poker table are held by the same few players, the only way the rest can keep playing with them is to borrow chips, even though in the end they will not be able to repay the loans.

Thibaut Courtois was the only player prior to this season to break the mould and return from years away on loan to join up with the first - team, but thanks to Antonio Conte, Victor Moses and Nathaniel Chalobah are getting their chance this term.

I expect us to sign only one player this January, probably an old CB on loan or a cheap one nearing the end of his contract.

Worryingly Wenger has sold loaned out 4 defensive players and bought only 2 (so far)..

In recent times it seems there more young players who never got a real chance and were send on loan spells only to be sold or disappear into anonymity.

The club should only have around 70 players on its book and that includes those on loan.

Vesides the club can only buy at most two players above the age of 21 unless it sells or send some players in that age category on loan.

At the end of the season wenger will be in an unusual situation, in that he will only have 29 players classed as over 21, 5 of those will be keepers so I expect 1 will be sold and 2 sent out on loan again, with Huddart or iliev being able added 3Rd choice keeper status and being underage.

Are we really surprised by Wenger though?this is the same manager who only signed a goalkeeper with no outfield players in the last summer transfer window and this is the same manager who brought in an injured CM Kim Kallstrom on loan when we were leading the league in January 2014 and we needed a striker!

The young Brazilian Wellington Silva has been an Arsenal player for nearly five years but has only played (and scored) in one reserve match — against Man United back in 2010 — but has subsequently been out on loan in Spain ever since.

OT: My wishes: — Wenger to stop playing Mert ahead of Gab... this is a must — Wenger being ruthless and stop being stubbornness «big wish» — Wenger to change his transfer policy «big wish as well» — Not count on very injury prone players (Wilshere, Walcott, Ox, Welbeck), take them only as a bounce because they would never stay fit... It is a dilemma because they are all quality home grown players, so I can not say «get rid of them all» — Give our smart attacking players (Sanchez, Cazorla, Ozil) what they need, a striker... that is a must — Strengthen the flank with another quality because all the sights now on Sanchez — Get rid of useless team players (Campbell, Flamini, yes they are useless) and replace them with better players (promote or buy good ones)-- Loan Chamber... 16M is too much to ruin

There are questions to be asked Why was jenkinson loaned out if Bellerin is not ready Why was Coquen (sorry can't spell) sent out if he was good enough 12 games ago tom e named Why keep Campbell if he's not good enough wouldn't money from his sale be better spent on a CB Why when SAGNA / Viera / and other 30 plus players were only offered 1 year contracts yet we are now scratching a midfield together with flamini / Arteta Why when things are not working e.g Moreal at CB do we persist with it I can put all these decisions down to wenger, and that's not bringing up the lack of signings

add that to their position on the table and how well their on loan players are doing and you can only hope and pray al this is just a one off

This is the only season that we are not servicing the loans and we can buy the best players available.

Only make a loan move with the option to have that player stay with Arsenal if the player proves himself and WE decide if he can benefit our club.

When you consider we also have josh vickers, who can play u21 and u18 (as an overage player) plus Ryan huddart and hugo keto who can play champions youth league and u18, we may as well loan out at least 2 keepers if not 3, but only till January so that we can call back if required.

I would prefer to sign him permanently in the summer rather than on loan in the winter.He is a great talent and could really shine in the epl with us.Yeah he is not the kind of superstar that ozil was when we signed him but that does not mean that he is not a top quality player.He could really be a good fit into our team.But I can guarantee you that signing draxler alone next summer will not bring us the epl title.The squad needs strengthening in at least 2 - 3 positions to win the title in what could actually be wenger's farewell season.Going back to draxler though, without a doubt he will only make the squad stronger but I just hope that he is one of the many players heading towards the emirates next season to help us win the title, regardless of where MESU - LEXIS are cum next august....

The thing that annoys me about Gibbs is, he doesn't pass the ball forward only back to the player that passed to him, and he should have been on the goal line for the corner, sorry but he is the weak link in the defence not a patch on Monreal so, we need a left back to cover Monreal send Gibbs out on loan.

The CF is an issue and it appears that Wenger has wanted that resolved, every transfer up till last season we have been interested in a CF... it is a shame the board spent # 16mil on a player who should have only been with us on loan and lets be honest, if Welbroke as only on a loan then do you think we would have made that move perm after his injury record with us???

The only reason why Wenger would loan a player for 20m is if there is a buyout clause as part of the deal.

But now he has not only just gone on loan to Bournemouth this season, but Jack has also admitted that he may not return to the Emirates, and just to put the icing on the cake, he now is telling other English players that they should use his loan, and Joe Hart's, as an «inspiration» for others to go out and leave top clubs to get regular playing time, and help get them a place in the England team.

The teenager's transfer situation is a slightly complicated one as he technically remains a Monaco player and is at PSG only on loan for this season.

What you mean the same player that AW didn't deem worthy of a place in his team until recently and who he loaned out to Charlton only to call him back because he had no other option?

the only thing that's constant in Arsenal is Wengers excuses for his failures, it's either the referee, the lines man, the pitch, the players not getting enough rest or too much rest, Injuries, International break, the pressure from Fans, the weather, the color of the jersey n so many other excuses... how can u loan Campbell n keep Sanogo?

If you look at Wilshere clearly he has these matches since his injury where he starts to get back to his old self.Honestly, I see an injury free Wilshere being world class even if it's not with us.The talent in him is just too much and only these repetitive injuries can hold him back.I don't see him becoming a normal player because even when you look at his Bournemouth loan which was okay the way he performed against the top teams shows he will make it.He's better than Ramsey but more injury prone.If he had Ramsey's fitness he'd be better.However, it's best we sell him with a buy back clause or send him on lian to aid his development.

All of Wenger's disastrous plans when it comes to transfers, both incoming and outgoing, are coming home to roost... why would anyone pay a significant fee for a player that was hardly used, is overpaid and has a spotty injury record; not to mention the fact that Wenger nickels & dimes everyone when it comes to transfers so it only makes sense that other teams would do likewise when dealing with us... the fact is I wouldn't be surprised if Wenger does this so that players won't be moved thereby giving him a ready - made excuse not to spend more money on transfers; there's a reason why the latest headlines regarding Arsenal transfers seem to suggest that we aren't bringing anyone in until some players are sold or moved elsewhere on loan... we know this club knows how to utilize press coverage to further their questionable agendas, it's the very reason why the Sanchez situation has become such a nightmare

Strange.People here are now glorifying Coquelin as if he is a different player after the loan spell.Coquelin is playing just like he was playing before he was loaned out.I always wondered why he wasnt played.I never understood why.i never recall him having a bad game.The only player that shone in the 8 - 2 defeat by Man U.

alot of player's have been loaned out and sold, which obviously has reduced the size of our squad and a few more could be leaving, yet we have only signed one old boy reject keeper from our enemy and two teenagers.

Playing players out of poz ruins them, like we did ruin Ramsey for years, or Coquelin playing him as a Rb only to loan him out, only to bring him back again out of panic which made our team then tick.

And will you stop protecting 8 million a year AW his messed up badly last two seasons by not bolstering with necesery players, and explain to me when even most people who only have a small understanding of football was saying our defence is thin he AW goes and loans out our RB Jenkinson to Westham who is ahed of us becouse of their great defensive work.

In fact, if he pulls off the Paulista deal I will be pleasantly surprised because Wenger usually signs very cheap players in January or loan like last year with Kallstrom being the only signing.

The club can only hold so many players and if the board are not selling the deadwood then it makes bringing in the required volume of quality harder... Add to that the board buying players that Wenger only wanted on loan to add to the driftwood...

Welbeck is in my mind ONLY ever going to be a good squad player he doesn't have the killer instinct needed in fron of goal and if he ai nt got it now he wont ever, its telling that Wenger would have only had him on loan and that Man Poo were more than happy to let himONLY ever going to be a good squad player he doesn't have the killer instinct needed in fron of goal and if he ai nt got it now he wont ever, its telling that Wenger would have only had him on loan and that Man Poo were more than happy to let himonly had him on loan and that Man Poo were more than happy to let him go.

The reports claims that Jenks, a lifelong Arsenal fan who appears to have failed to nail down a playing career in north London, is going to play for Birmingham City in the Championship and although it is only a loan deal it does make room in the squad for another player.

Now on to my Loaners obviously its would be difficult for any of those players to get into the starting eleven on a regular basis, the i - 2 games they would receive would not improve their development, therefore it is only right that they go on loan, to get the game time needed to impress Wenger

The only player I would have loaned to Man Utd is André Santos by the way with a strict clause of him having to be fielded 90 mins a game.

So far we've only spent 30 million by replacing players that've left so instead of going those two if wenger wanted to win the league he would've went all out to get Cavani / bony / benteke and sent Sanogo on loan so he can get regular experience.

Therefore the actual numbers of players sold or Loaned out is actually 23 (although a couple of those are only until January) The actual number of players brought in is 15, cech, Bennacer and reine - adelaide are all professionals, whilst another 12 are 1st year scholars though many of those will become young professionals this season.

I think the main or even the only favour we need is from our available players NOT on loan players.

If Alexis contract wasn't so low then I would be surprised if AFC would listen to offers less near double the offers we read about now... Silent Stan doesn't have to sell the player to get a loan from a bank... He only needs the share prices to back him in his business deals.

Gibbs would have been slaughtered if he played in for Monreal against Bayan, he is the only full back that when received a ball he plays it back not forward He gets forward but his defending is woefull, now he is a player that needs loaning and Arsenal getting in a left back to cover Monreal Again look to a lower Div.

And the only way to get a player better without risking our own defence is to loan him out.

chuba has been loaned simply may be bcuz wenger is satisfied with walcott's performance in middle and does not necessarily indicate that new striker is coming besides the only quality players available are gotze and javi matrinez i think.

18 players were either sold or loaned out & we signed only cech 312 / w wages cleared all for what / whom stan kroenke?

Wenger made the comment tonight that you had to rotate players for playing in the champions league — well surely if that was the case, why did he sell / loan 14 players and only bring in 1?

After all we are the only club in history to sign a player with a broken back on loan: /

if the inflation of players from abroad and English players are being sold to other teams in there respective leagues at a premium rate or even loaned Is probably the only reason AW and the board have had to spend, I know it seems obvious but money is something that is spoke about at arsenal and rarely ever spent, they have had to turn the pressure valve.

I will point to the fact that Wenger openly said in an interview that he only wanted Welbeck on loan and yet he is an AFC player, same year that the board buy instead of loaning like Wenger wanted, we also got Chambers.