And this is
only logical because this is the first step.
Not exact matches
The economics - related discussions are from an «Austrian» perspective,
because I've found that the Austrian School is the
only school of economics that is consistently
logical and explains how the world really works.
I believe in God
because I see evidence that He exists On the other hand, your statement that yours is the
only logical position rests on your view that there is no evidence.
For me I see evolution the same as you see God not enough proof to say I believe it and see God as how all things started, in my view evolution of man can be true just that it has not been proven where God I can see
because there is no other
logical explanation for how the matter in the universe came to be from nothing, a higher power for now can be the
only possible answer if science was to prove the creation of the universe in some other way I would not deny that truth.
-- and to refute your point before you make, just
because it DID happen does not point to god being the
only reason why and therefor god exists, that's shoe - horning god into something that has no need for god nor makes any
logical sense
Again, I don't aim to lock anybody into a
logical box where the answer must
only be, «the Christian God is real»
because, in truth, there is simply no way to do that.
Unless us «conspiracy theorists» were right all along and the government does have some secret drug deal going down with the aliens
because a UFO is pretty much the
only logical means to get the body moved 1,000 miles within 20 minutes.
A common argument I often hear from those who try to prove to me that Jesus rose from the dead, is that
because the tomb where Jesus was supposedly buried was empty the
only logical conclusion was that he must have risen.
Because of his philosophical starting point (science goes from simple to complex), Dawkins does not regard the existence of the staircase as something whose existence needs to be proved, but rather as a
logical necessity that
only needs to be illustrated.
because in the bible it states «But about that day or hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but
only the Father» Mark 13:32 and if jesus warned us about the end times so that verse alone is contradicting but there is always a
logical explanation.
And yet, even for psychicalism — and this explains the qualification «partly» — psychical concepts are also different from obviously formal ideas
because they are categorial, and hence universally applicable, not to entities of all
logical types, but
only to «concrete singulars,» which is to say, individuals and events, as distinct both from aggregates, which are concrete but not singular, and all levels of qualities, which are merely abstract (141).
because in a tragedy like this, it begs the
only logical answer - there is no god.
Logical possibility as the absence of incompatibility of one concept with another is significant
only because the concepts, one by one, express aspects of the creative process.
You are
only mad
because there is no
logical argument against equal rights.
Watching a magic show
only frustrates me
because I am a
logical thinker and can't figure out how they do what they do.
His principle of «modal coincidence» is, I presume, intended to resolve the problem, but if it does, it is
only because the modes are real and not
only logical or linguistic.
No other city appears to be seriously in the running for 1980 and, in any case, Moscow's selection seems
logical if
only because the Soviet Union has been a dominant factor in the Games since its return to the Olympic fold in 1952.
Because if so, the 16 - or 20 - team playoff model below is the
only logical solution.
there is no doubting that Arsene has helped to provide us with some incredible footballing moments in the formative years of his managerial career at Arsenal, but that certainly doesn't and shouldn't mean that he has earned the right to decide when and how he should leave this club... there have been numerous managers at each of the biggest clubs in Europe throughout the last decade who have waged far more successful campaigns than ours yet somehow and someway each were given their walking papers
because they failed to meet the standards laid out by the hierarchy of their respective clubs... of course that doesn't mean that clubs should simply follow the lead of others, especially if clubs of note have become too reactionary when it comes to issues of termination, for whatever reasons, but there should be some
logical discourse when it comes to the setting of parameters for a changing of the guard... in the case of Arsenal, this sort of discourse was largely stifled when the higher - ups devised their sinister plan on the eve of our move to the Emirates... by giving Wenger a free pass due to supposed financial constraints he, unwittingly or not, set the bar too low... it reminds me of a landlord who says he will
only rent to «professional people» to maintain a certain standard then does a complete about face when the market is lean and vacancies are up... for those who rented under the original mandate they of course feel cheated but there is little they can do, except move on, especially if the landlord clearly cares more about profitability than keeping their word... unfortunately for the lifelong fans of a football club it's not so easy to switch allegiances and frankly why should they, in most cases we have been around far longer than them... so how does one deal with such an untenable situation... do you simply shut - up and hope for the best, do you place the best interests of those with
only self - serving agendas above the collective and pray that karma eventually catches up with them, do you run away with your tail between your legs and
only return when things have ultimately changed, do you keep trying to find silver linings to justify your very existence, do you lower your expectations by convincing yourself it could be worse or do you stand up for what you believe in by holding people accountable for their actions, especially when every fiber of your being tells you that something is rotten in the state of Denmark
As it stands, this squad is fairly well positioned to compete for the Wenger Cup and make a deep run in the Europa, if and
only if we play first stringers in Europe and use the bench for the League and FA Cups... that being said, and based on the fragility of the manager and the team in recent campaigns, it's more likely that Wenger will focus on a top 4 finish and the FA Cup... while the reasons for such an approach may appear
logical, it would confirm a rather disturbing trend and appear counter intuitive for any team which claims to have higher aspirations... I feel that Wenger simply can't afford to put all his eggs in the Europa basket
because if he fails the potential backlash could cripple any top 4 chances due to the aforementioned fragile psyche that tends to rear it's ugly head like our own personal groundhog day each and every February... furthermore, can you even imagine Wenger bringing in the necessary recruits to adequately supply top quality lineups in a Thursday / Sunday dominated schedule; based on everything I've seen in recent years, I can't see that happening... in fact, mark my words, it's more likely that we see Lacazette playing out wide in Alexis's position with Giroud at striker, than we see Wenger make the necessary moves to right this ship... god, I hope I'm wrong but is it really that far - fetched considering what we've witnessed for past several years
Obviously, if they don't leave, we can't sign a new one not
only because of financial restrictions, but also
because it wouldn't be
logical to have five or six centre - backs.
These are my beliefs based on some research but
only because the research makes
logical sense to me.
Black says it was one of the
only books on the subject she couldn't put down
because it was compassionate and
logical.
I remember that it was
only one occasion that he took a position to file an amendment and he was prepared to push that amendment to its
logical conclusion
because he believed that position he was taking on the floor of the House.
Yet, no one seems to want to do away with it
because they don't want public financing of campaigns — which seems to me to be the
only logical solution.
I changed» item of the week» into» item of the month», It's more
logical because I
only do this once a month.
Dancing, jumping and yelling crowd never needs any reasons and any
logical things
because everyone here uses
only emotions.
This contextual narrative is relevant
because Silver Linings Playbook, Russell's latest ensemble dramatic comedy, seems both the culmination of a career built around quirk and, perhaps more importantly, the next
logical step forward for a director whose taste for illustrious decoration has
only just been whetted.
On the other hand, proponents of the traditional system argue that teachers» experience and education are crucial indicators of their performance, and that
because of its open and fair assessment it is the
only logical choice.
Proper usage of position sizing not
only means you will have more winning trades, but it also means you will trade more objectively,
because you are placing your stop loss at
logical points above or below support or resistance levels, instead of randomly placing it a set amount of pips away from entry.
There you have it, everyone — keep saving up your nickels and dimes,
because Microsoft is bombarding us with so much new content that it's
only logical for us to continue paying as penance.
To call it a puzzle game feels somewhat off the mark,
because only some levels require real
logical reasoning, while others are about reflexes or just following patterns or in some cases simply hammering away at a button to fill a bar.
I
only chose the second
because I keep thinking that the early 20th century global warming is more than likely natural and so it seems
logical to assume that the mid century global cooling, in the main, must have had a similar origin.
The
only logical way to make a decision is to base it on the best science available at the time
because there is no other way.
I admit that going into Eradicating Ecocide I was inclined to agree with Higgins — part out of personal inclination and part
because nearly a year ago Polly and I sat down in Copenhagen for coffee to discuss the topic and she made a compelling case then — but just in the 200 pages presented here she does a great job examining both the historical situation which gave rise to corporate personhood and early attempts to stop pollution, more modern examples (many of which have been be well documented on TreeHugger, they being so current), and makes a good moral and
logical argument that the
only way we are going to truly stop ecocide is to make it a serious crime.
Because Ireland will be «the
only remaining English - speaking, common law tradition country in the EU and eurozone, it makes [Ireland] the
logical gateway for investment for countries that share that heritage,» including the US and Canada, as well as Australia and New Zealand, according to Black.
A certain number of decisions simply won't need to be made, either
because the passing of time and other project events have obviated them or
because it's now clear
only one available or
logical path remains and therefore no decision is needed.
Because of the simple reason that the company is better known than the individual and that the individual requires the job, it is
only logical that he / she is the one to provide the proper references for their job.