Sentences with phrase «only logical there»

To be able to communicate efficiently with such a diverse client base, it is only logical there be a common business language, and English it that common language.

Not exact matches

I believe in God because I see evidence that He exists On the other hand, your statement that yours is the only logical position rests on your view that there is no evidence.

The only logical conclusion is that there are no gods, not even just one, that the jc myth is just that, a myth, and that all religion is for the delusional.

For me I see evolution the same as you see God not enough proof to say I believe it and see God as how all things started, in my view evolution of man can be true just that it has not been proven where God I can see because there is no other logical explanation for how the matter in the universe came to be from nothing, a higher power for now can be the only possible answer if science was to prove the creation of the universe in some other way I would not deny that truth.

Again, I don't aim to lock anybody into a logical box where the answer must only be, «the Christian God is real» because, in truth, there is simply no way to do that.

There is no logical flaw A potential flaw is only created if God is incompetent.

There are many more possibilities than being poofed here by a creator god, and even if there were some kind of creator, there is no logical reason to assume that there is only one of There are many more possibilities than being poofed here by a creator god, and even if there were some kind of creator, there is no logical reason to assume that there is only one of there were some kind of creator, there is no logical reason to assume that there is only one of there is no logical reason to assume that there is only one of there is only one of them.

There very definitely is such an element, only it is not logical, but emotional, or having to do with feeling.

However, even apart from the tenuousness of this tradition as exposed by Whitehead's careful examination of it (only parts of which we have presented in the previous chapters), there are serious logical fallacies involved in its denial of the genuinely emergent character of life and mind.

because in the bible it states «But about that day or hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father» Mark 13:32 and if jesus warned us about the end times so that verse alone is contradicting but there is always a logical explanation.

Since there is no indication of any sentience, and the fact that there are an infinite number of other possibilities, the only logical conclusion you can make is no conclusion at all.

out of the whole essay you wrote there was only one logical point you made, «The mentality of this culture is like rats.»

But given the utter lack of evidence in support of existence, it is only logical to conclude that there are no gods.

The logical implications of that story are ridicules; If there were only 1 god, there would be only one religion.

But there is no such thing as pure metaphysical necessity for Bergson; only instances of people forgetfully importing logical necessity into our discussions of metaphysics.

There is not only a kind of logical scandal in asserting both p and not - p, where p is any proposition, but also a conviction that such a contradiction is an impossibility in the domain of existent things.

But there were some major flaws in the book, not only with some logical errors, but also with some misunderstandings of Scripture, and a misunderstanding of how and why the early church began to meet on Sunday rather than on Saturday as had been the custom among Jesus and His disciples.

There is only one LOGICAL religion in the Universe, and the only one that allows for faith as well, is the reality of the Invisible Pink Unicorns.

It is probably socially shunned and there is no place else to vent that anger and it does not have any life outside this blog it only logical place is to turn to this blog.

The only logical choice for one claiming that there is no god is to be an agnostic (there is a possibility of a god but I have no knowledge for whatever reason).

In interpretation, the reader entertains propositions whose logical subjects include entities in the reader's (and author's) past world; only as such do they become components of the interpreter's «forms of subjectivity»; so there is always an element of objective reference.

And among the «proposals» entertained in a given moment there are those whose logical subjects include the percipient subject; but these are not the only «proposals» there are.

because in a tragedy like this, it begs the only logical answer - there is no god.

This is not to deny that the coin — an actuality — has only two faces; it is only to point out that the result of a coin flip depends on the angle which these faces make with a surface, and there is a logical possibility of any angle, not just approximately 0 degrees, for the result.

You are only mad because there is no logical argument against equal rights.

Definition of False Dilemma: A false dilemma (also called false dichotomy, the either - or fallacy, fallacy of false choice, black - and - white thinking, or the fallacy of exhaustive hypotheses) is a type of logical fallacy that involves a situation in which only two alternatives are considered, when in fact there is at least one additional option.

«Ontologically all monotheists affirm that there can only be one divine being, and it seems logical to me that there must be some referential overlap or similarity in the divine being that each is referring to in each of the monotheistic religions,» said Jones, according to a transcript posted by The Wheaton Record.

Oh, husky — you've fallen for a logical fallacy called Pascal's wager — assuming that there are only tow possible scenarios after someone dies.

Perhaps we may say that behind all the objections raised against demythologizing there lurks a fear that if it were carried to its logical conclusion it would make it impossible for us to speak of an act of God, or if we did it would only be the symbolical description of a subjective experience.

That is only logical in that there can be, or usually are, problems in a marriage when each belongs, and are ardent adhearers, to different churches.

I've had many a debate over the last 3 - 4 years here and in many other forums where the «In God We Trust» issue was brought up not only to «promote» but to also, make a false logical leap to... «There «is» a God»... and it is the christian god.

there is no doubting that Arsene has helped to provide us with some incredible footballing moments in the formative years of his managerial career at Arsenal, but that certainly doesn't and shouldn't mean that he has earned the right to decide when and how he should leave this club... there have been numerous managers at each of the biggest clubs in Europe throughout the last decade who have waged far more successful campaigns than ours yet somehow and someway each were given their walking papers because they failed to meet the standards laid out by the hierarchy of their respective clubs... of course that doesn't mean that clubs should simply follow the lead of others, especially if clubs of note have become too reactionary when it comes to issues of termination, for whatever reasons, but there should be some logical discourse when it comes to the setting of parameters for a changing of the guard... in the case of Arsenal, this sort of discourse was largely stifled when the higher - ups devised their sinister plan on the eve of our move to the Emirates... by giving Wenger a free pass due to supposed financial constraints he, unwittingly or not, set the bar too low... it reminds me of a landlord who says he will only rent to «professional people» to maintain a certain standard then does a complete about face when the market is lean and vacancies are up... for those who rented under the original mandate they of course feel cheated but there is little they can do, except move on, especially if the landlord clearly cares more about profitability than keeping their word... unfortunately for the lifelong fans of a football club it's not so easy to switch allegiances and frankly why should they, in most cases we have been around far longer than them... so how does one deal with such an untenable situation... do you simply shut - up and hope for the best, do you place the best interests of those with only self - serving agendas above the collective and pray that karma eventually catches up with them, do you run away with your tail between your legs and only return when things have ultimately changed, do you keep trying to find silver linings to justify your very existence, do you lower your expectations by convincing yourself it could be worse or do you stand up for what you believe in by holding people accountable for their actions, especially when every fiber of your being tells you that something is rotten in the state of Denmark

Whilst I understand why they are not following that path (the only legit and logical path that there is) it is literally the worst handling of a situation I have ever seen.

There is a logical reason that most adoptions to the US come from only a few countries — availability of children in need of homes.

There seems to be only one logical time and, oddly, research backs it up.

«Good, positive stuff» will only continue occurring in Orange County if there is proper leadership and if the County finances are dealt with in a clear, concise and logical manner.

The opposition was grounded in four things: first, many thought the term simply shouldn't be applied to same - sex couples for logical reasons, as it had only ever been applied to heterosexual couples; second, it was viewed as cynical pandering to the agenda of the militant left; third, there were many worse things wrong with the country that required not just the time, but the goodwill of Tory MPs, to get through; and fourth, Cameron had no mandate to do it.

When a political movement is built on amplifying division and an identity derived from opposition to other groups, there is only one logical end point.

«There is no logical path to these laws; only intuition... can reach them,» Einstein said.

There's only so many business outfits that are appropriate [and logical] for teaching.

So once you cover the basics, there's only one logical step from there: go wild.

There is something about this country and this nation that makes you want to think about the «matters of the flesh and heart» and it is only logical to be interested in meeting these people.

Written without much in terms of legitimate explanation from the not - as - clever - as - you'd - think script by the team of Solomon (The In - Laws, Charlie's Angels), Yakin (Prince of Persia, The Rookie), and Ricourt, the amount of razzle - dazzle is high and the amount of expository information is at a minimum, explaining only a few minor illusions on the hope that we'll buy that there is a logical explanation for all of the other jaw - dropping moments we aren't in the know on.

It was a hopeless sort of exhilaration, a kind of arrogance born of fatalism, I guess, of the feeling that if you could lose a couple of parents in a month, then basically anything could happen, at any time — all bullets bear your name, all cars are there to crush you, any balcony could give way; more disaster seemed only logical.

There was only one logical explanation for what I was seeing.

There's only one logical conclusion — female authors should avoid the sexist hellholes of traditional publishing and self - publish.

I thought it logical that all documents I've transferred to the device should show there, but only PDFs actually showed up.

Much to my surprise, there's no logical path from there to a hard copy book (I only want two copies and it's only 13 pages long).

While past performance by itself is usually not predictive, there are logical reasons to believe AQR's long - short stock selection strategy will maintain its edge over AQR's multi-style long - only stock selection strategies.

There you have it, everyone — keep saving up your nickels and dimes, because Microsoft is bombarding us with so much new content that it's only logical for us to continue paying as penance.