Sentences with phrase «only married people»

There is an income cap on the Roth IRA: Only married people earning less than $ 189,000, or single people earning less than $ 120,000, are allowed to make the maximum yearly contribution of $ 5,500 (or $ 6,500 for people aged 50 or older).

/ speculation As this vote only affected civil weddings, a Muslim could still believe that Muslims should only marry people of the opposite gender in a Muslim wedding, while voting in favour of marriage equality for secular weddings.

Once upon a time, we would only marry people we were somehow already connected to in our social circles.

The free online dating service analyzed over 7,000 photographs from users on its site to better understand what kinds of profile Once upon a time, we would only marry people we were somehow already connected to in our social circles.

Not exact matches

There were also some online rumblings that the dating feature might be open only to people who list themselves as «single» and not those who are «married» or «in a relationship,» ignoring the subset of people who are in non-monogamous relationships.

These two teams need to be married, and the only person who has the authority to «ordain» this marriage is the CEO.

The problem is no single person or married couple can live off only $ 6,300 and $ 12,600 in income, respectively.

Wondering why only a small percentage of married people opt to file separately?

This is all about control with religion and it has to stop.Gay people getting married doesn't have anything to do with straight people getting married.People are so full of hatred and disrespect it isn't funny.I'm glad this has come out now, because it really shows how evil people really are.But these people who are so into GOD, the Bible, Church, and the only way of life they live 4 god, by god are the 1s who prmote going around the world starting WARS, killing innocent women, men, children and families because Jesus guides them in everything they do.That is a crock of B.S. if I ever heard it.They will continus to use GOD and continue their EVIL ways to get whatever they want and CONTROL who ever they can.

I think you people fail to realize that LIFE EXPECTANCY WAS ONLY 35 TO 40 YEARS OLD THEN... marrying at 15 was very common up to the 17 — 18th century.

To hold that same - sex marriage is part of the fundamental right to marry, or necessary for giving LGBT people the equal protection of the laws, the Court implicitly made a number of other assumptions: that one - flesh union has no distinct value in itself, only the feelings fostered by any kind of consensual sex; that there is nothing special about knowing the love of the two people whose union gave you life, whose bodies gave you yours, so long as you have two sources of care and support; that what children need is parenting in some disembodied sense, and not mothering and fathering.

Less than 20 % of Americans said they would be unhappy if a close family member married someone from the opposite political party and only 11 % said they would be upset if that person was of a different race.

My son probably summed it up best in his comment: «I'm in favor of gay people getting married, but only to other gay people.»

The survey found that 35 per cent of men polled said they hadn't got married because they hadn't met the right person compared to only 29 per cent of women.

That has not been the case for some time now and we need to strip all married people of social security and only provide pensions based on earnings of the individual period.

To give an example: The Church may change and adapt to modern life certain principles of her human law according to which a Catholic must marry; but only a person of little theological knowledge would draw the conclusion that the Church could ever abolish the indissolubility of the sacramental consummated marriage if only there were enough protests.

If it dares to speak, it will find not only that its common life is transformed beyond all recognition, but also that its teachings begin to appear to single and married people alike as a treasure to be shared rather than as a burden to be inflicted.

Making divorce illegal will only serve to discourage many people from marrying in the first place, which will lead to more single parent homes and a further degredation of our society.

In a recent survey I took of over 1,000 married people, the majority said they spend only 15 - 30 minutes per week in quality conversation with their spouse.

A good life would not take away the ability of LGBT people to marry because they don't agree with it, and a good life would allow peopple to control their own bodies and lives, because only they can trully know what is best for them.

Unfortunately, people who «think of themselves as married» not only refuse the obligations of real marriage but demand all of its cultural privileges; because rationalization is so much work, they require other people to support them in it.

Would you rally for the government to make it so that only people who had never been married before could get married?

In Coming Apart, Murray finds that in only about 65 percent of working - class households (limited to persons ages thirty to forty - nine) does someone work at least forty hours a week and that only 48 percent of working - class adults ages thirty to forty - nine are married.

Only then can the relationship between God and God's people be of such direct intimacy as to make the pious attempt of others to serve as intermediaries seem like a meddling intrusion upon married love: «No longer shall each man teach his neighbor and each his brother saying «Know the Lord,» for they shall all know me, from the least of them to the greatest.»

Now, if we do not think in this context, in the perspective of existence, but only in the perspective of nature, then it may seem that relations are essential; but if we include the aspect of existence as the most important, then we may say, for example, «I am married to a certain person,» but when this person dies it does not destroy my being.

Hard questions arise when people of faith exercise religion in ways that may be seen to conflict with the new right to same - sex marriage — when, for example, a religious college provides married student housing only to opposite - sex married couples, or a religious adoption agency declines to place children with same - sex married couples.

I think what happened to these two people who only wanted to marry is, well, ironic.

But it didn't anticipate some of the disastrous effects we are now experiencing: Not only do most people in developed nations approve of men having sex with men and women having sex with women, but developed nations have also have made it legal for men to marry men and women to marry women.

Why do you think that only some people should be able to marry whom they choose?

Let people marry whomever they want — it's only FAIR.

If only a «man» and a «woman» can get «married», then you have to have CLEAR definitions of all 3 terms so that you can rule in each case whether 2 people can «marry» or not.

People who love each other only get to marry if they're opposite se.xes.

In the hedonic model, the only people who get married are the people who can afford to consume lavishly.

The same people who think only men should be pastors, probably have other (hidden) criteria related to sexuality and gender — in my experience, a majority of pastors are straight, married, cisgender men.

Today, only half of Americans 18 and over are married and the age of people entering their first marriage has reached an all - time high among men and women.

The probability is so small that everyone that is married just «happens» to run into the ONE and ONLY person they are supposed to be with the rest of their lives.

If small busniess owners (like someone who owned five rental properties) can decide only to rent to legally married couples, for instance (and marital status is one of those things for which you are protected from descrimination) then there could suddenly be quite a number of people who are unable to find places to live, or can be taken advantage of by a limited number of other renters.

Not only are they frustrated that they're not married, but they're also feeling judged and marginalized as «failures» by people like me who are saying that marriage should be the norm.

1,085 unmarried people between the ages of 18 - 35 were sampled with only 7 % saying they «had no intention of ever being married».

Sandra commented: «Not only is it places like a church that people put a higher value on as a place to get married in over but they put a high value on historic buildings and also places that have meaning to them

If a person is SSA only, but married opposite sex to make family happy and have grandchildren for grandma (so grandma will leave her considerable estate to the adult child who never told her they were SSA), would that be sin?

HI Bethany & Rachel, Dessert was part of our meal when I was a child but as I grew up & had my own house I got away from it only serving until I got married and my husband is a big dessert person.

There are also societal messages that the best or only «real» love is always tied to one person forever, often a sexual partner and often a partner we marry.

On the other hand, I also think people eager to get married should also step back and really think about the long - term effect of the commitment and not marry that person who clearly isn't ready or is only marrying because they feel pressured (lightly or heavily) into doing it.

I have found the only people interested in me now are married men looking for a fling or men much older looking for someone 10 years younger.

Because the only way to have a relationship — married or not, cohabiting or not, monogamous or consensually non-monogamous, you name it — that continues happily is to have each person choose each other over and over because they love each other in a way that they want to stay together (which, of course, is the thinking behind a renewable marriage contract).

And the promotion of «traditional» marriage will continue to make people unhappy, first because there is no such thing as «traditional» marriage — marriage has been changing since humans created the concept — and second because the model doesn't work for about half of us, probably more as many people stay married in name only just to get health benefits, etc..

We are not only in a sexless marriage, we are married to people who are intimacy challenged.

And with a post on The New I Do website from last year on sexless marriage still attracting comments by unhappily married people in that situation — many who feel their only options are to suffer, divorce or cheat — it's clear there's a bigger discussion.

And that's how society treats people who chose to couple outside the one - size - fits - all marital box we've been led to believe is the only way to live — get married and live together.