The extensive focus on test scores as
the only measure of student progress is forcing educators to teach to the test.
Not exact matches
This vacuum stems not
only from the difficulty
of the endeavor but also from a persistent national clash between an obsession to train
students solely for high scores on multiple - choice tests and an angry disenchantment with
measuring progress of public schools, educators, or education schools.
Creating formal assessment
of these hard - to -
measure qualities would not
only help to elucidate whether
students are making
progress in these areas, but would help shift the attention back onto what's important.
But, depressingly, this
only brought the group up to 8 percent proficiency; and despite this
progress, they are outperformed by the low - income
students (
measured by scale scores)
of every participating city except Detroit.
The report, released Wednesday, relies on standards used by the National Assessment
of Education
Progress, the
only national - level standardized test, considered the gold standard for
measuring actual
student achievement.
One major vendor
of value - added
measures (i.e., SAS as in SAS - EVAAS) long has held that the tests need
only to have 1) sufficient «stretch» in the scales «to ensure that
progress could be
measured for low - and high achieving
students», 2) that «the test is highly related to the academic standards,» and 3) «the scales are sufficiently reliable from one year to the next» (see, for example, here).
In order to monitor Arizona's
progress towards the Governor's goals, we should encourage any programs or initiatives that not
only address early identification and interventions for
students struggling in math, but also
measure and report the math performance
of all eighth grade
students, no matter the test they take.
What evolved was a measurement framework that based its assessment
of school quality on
students» performance on
only a single assessment (an invalid standard for
measuring student progress) and mandated a series
of wide - ranging sanctions that did not prove to significantly improve
student or school performance.
In contrast to the traditional methods
of measuring school effectiveness (including the adequate yearly
progress system set up under NCLB), value - added models do not look
only at current levels
of student achievement.
In the school year before AYD was implemented, scaled scores for those
students had increased by
only 1 point on the
Measures of Adequate
Progress (MAP) test, and just 20 % met district growth targets.
«The Flippen Group's easy to follow step - by - step approach to Capturing Kids» Hearts has enabled my staff to effectively create positive choices for challenging and disruptive
students, and has made a positive impact on our school's overall climate that is
measured not
only in the
progress seen on our school's New York City Progress Reports, but also in the very feeling of our building when you e
progress seen on our school's New York City
Progress Reports, but also in the very feeling of our building when you e
Progress Reports, but also in the very feeling
of our building when you enter it.
There is
only one reliable
measure of overall
student achievement in the United States: the National Assessment
of Educational
Progress, administered biannually to a representative sample
of students by the U.S. Department
of Education.
As Congress begins preparing for debate over the reauthorization
of No Child Left Behind, state schools chief Tom Torlakson has joined the chorus
of voices calling for the replacement
of Adequate Yearly
Progress with a new growth system - one that not only measures student academic progress but also health and wellness, and school dropou
Progress with a new growth system - one that not
only measures student academic
progress but also health and wellness, and school dropou
progress but also health and wellness, and school dropout rates.
ESSA is clear that the school ratings have to reflect how schools are doing for all
students and for each
student group on each
of the indicators (except
progress toward English - language proficiency, which is
only measured for English learners).