Sentences with phrase «only minutes per»

It demonstrates that it literally takes only minutes per day to connect with your partner and let them know they are loved.

Not exact matches

By contrast, if everyone spends 15 minutes writing a summary, you consume 150 minutes in writing time but, because most people can read (or skim) 10 times faster than they can listen, you're adding only 15 minutes per person (i.e., 1.5 X 10) for a total reading time of 150 person - minutes.

Only about 60 per cent of Air Canada's flights pulled up to the gate within 15 minutes of their scheduled arrival times in 2012, according to figures tracked by the website FlightStats — that's one of the worst records among major international airlines.

On Wednesday, after China announced retaliatory tariffs, the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell by 2 per cent in the opening minutes, only to end the session up around 1 per cent, presumably on the hope that a compromise will ultimately be reached.

With some practice, the process of scanning headlines and putting together a weekly news roundup can be done in only a few minutes a day, resulting in one beefy blog post per week.

Once machines are placed, franchisees can maintain them once every 6 - 8 weeks at only about 3 minutes per machine.

Today the shelves of Christian bookstores bulge with material that makes Charlie Shedd look like a prophetic sage (even if he did recommend only a trifling 15 minutes of exercise per day) rather than an object of easy derision.

In a recent survey I took of over 1,000 married people, the majority said they spend only 15 - 30 minutes per week in quality conversation with their spouse.

If we now consider the number of the stars (15,000 x 106 visible to the optical telescope alone) you will understand how it is possible to say, cosmically speaking, that we are enveloped in a sort of monstrous gas formed of molecules as heavy as the Sun moving at distances from each other so great that they have to be reckoned in light - years (bearing in mind that light travels at a speed of 186,000 miles per second, and that we are only 8 light - minutes distant from the sun)-- a gas made of stars!

But this is the number of people who watch only 15 minutes per week or more, and 15 minutes per week is not very much when the average viewer spends more than 30 hours per week watching TV.

For the shrimp and scallops, it only took about two or three minutes per side until they were done.

Keeping things simple as per the theme here, you only need 3 ingredients and about 10 minutes + cooling time.

HOWEVER after 15 minutes the buns were only half cooked????? So I rotated the tray (as per your suggestion) and reset the timer and at thirty minutes the buns were acceptable.

We grill our salmon only about 8 minutes per side, but you could broil it in the oven too (Broil about 6 - 8 minutes, depending on the thickness).

You don't have to like doing it, you just need to get the job done — and it only takes a few minutes per day.

As a kid, I used to be very bendy, but fast - forward several decades and several kids, the range of motion in my back had left and gone elsewhere — but, I'm happy to say that with some consistency in stretching (only a couple minutes per day), I'm getting my bendable back back!

Cook your noodles as per package instructions; mine only took about 1 1/2 to 2 minutes on medium boil.

Going all - out, such a line could only produce 20 bags per minute.»

In their twin configuration, the new Ishida weighing and packaging systems take up only about one and half times the space of a previous single multihead weigher and bagmaker, yet are able to deliver around 220 bags per minutes for crisps and as much as 280 bags per minute for extruded snacks, compared to 80 and 90 bags respectively with the older equipment.

Grill steak for approximately 5 -6 minutes per side, flipping only once if possible.

The bacon should only take a couple of minutes per side.

My heartbeat used to be normal now its slow and eratic to the extent that electronic pulse measureing devices can't measure my pulse, instead of about 60 beats per minute, its now down to about 30, the electronic devices only go down to 35.

It takes 6 hours to do it this way, but really, it's only a few minutes per each layer.

Tuesday: 7 outdoor miles Wednesday: 50 minutes weight lifting increased weights significantly (only completing 5 - 6 reps per 3 x set), 40 minutes climbing on the treadmill Thursday: 7.25 outdoor miles, kettle bell work / functional knee training

A bagger may be able to pack bags at a rate of 150 bags per minute, but if the scale can only handle 80 weighs per minute, then the overall productivity will be significantly reduced.

Cook 4 pieces at a time until done, about 1 - 2 minutes per side, turning only once.

Grill on each side of the pineapple rings, and the flesh side only of the banana halves with the lid down until you get a bit of char marks, about 4 - 5 minutes per side for the pineapples, and about 3 - 4 minute for the single side of the banana.

He may not have quite been at his best after only returning to Arsenal training around a week ago, but Per Mertesacker's 90 minutes against Everton at Goodison Park could prove to be very important for the Gunners in the season ahead.

His goals per minute is only slightly better than Giroud playing in a Much weaker league.

Now they're playing 24 minutes per game, which actually means, in a lot of games, they only played 20ish minutes.

I mean he only played 21.8 minutes per game.

As a college player, Jackson feels a bit underutilized: he only averages 11 points and he's fourth on the team in minutes per game.

He averaged only 2.9 fouls per 48 minutes as well, which could be an indicator of how locked in the young player is on that end of the ball, too.

10.68 strikes absorbed per minute; that's near double anyone else I could find on Fight Metric (apart from Priscila Cachoeira @ 10.09 and this is only from one sample, the battering she received from Shevchenko)

Despite only playing 23 minutes a night with the Lakers (they wanted to go small ball with Randle at Center), he averaged 1.3 blocks per game which is good for 15th in the NBA.

He's 23 and his goals per minute ratio is 99, which currently is bested only by Ronaldo, Messi, Neymar and Aguero of the top leagues.

Crabbe was rightfully criticized (and traded because of a $ 19M contract) for only scoring 13.5 pts per 36 minutes and averaging 10.7 pts per game last year (this year he scored 15.7 pts per 36 minutes and averaged 12.8 pts per game).

Pero Antic, who is as terrifying - looking as Nikola Pekovic, has the Hawks» best Net Rating — the Hawks outscore their opponents by 11.7 points when he's on the floor and by just one point when he's off — but he's only played 10.5 minutes per game in 18 games.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

On the flipside, his 1.6 blocks per game are the lowest since his rookie season in which he only played 18 minutes per game.

Bol led the league in swats twice and is No. 15 on the all - time blocks list despite playing only 18.7 minutes per game throughout his 10 - year career.

Giving multiple first team chances to Sonago and while limiting Akpom to 10 minutes two games per year, keeping faith in Sonago (scoring only once) while Afobe has been ripping league one apart.

He also had 40 blocked shots, a figure surpassed by only four other guards — Clyde Drexler, Julius Erving, Michael Cooper and Marques Johnson, who are more like forwards — and totaled more minutes per game than all but three NBA backcourt men.

Another striker who gets 0.60 G+A / 90 and plays 2700 minutes would only add 4.5 goals / assists per season.

Those number all hold true per 100 possesions as well, since Crabbe is only playing 4 more minutes per game.

He had less game time last season than the one before that so using 2015 - 16 as his benchmark, only Kos surpasses him as Per despite more games / minutes wasn't as assured.

Don't we all remember Germany bringing Per Mertesacker for only the last five minutes in the world cup final?

Over the Summer, Rugby NorCal hosts a robust Summer Sevens Series, the abbreviated version of the game, played on a full - size field, but for only seven minute halves, and with only seven players per team.

Despite playing up front for much of the season, Alexis has only averaged 0.41 goals per 90 minutes in the Champions League, according to Squawka.

The Wolf Pack's four top scorers and their three top rebounders are on their second stops as college players, and among non-transfers, Hall is the only active one averaging more than seven minutes per game.