Sentences with phrase «only models the value»

Respecting him as a separate individual not only models the value we need to place on others in our homes and communities, but also sets the stage for a mutually respectful relationship in his teen years and beyond.

Not exact matches

«I think when you disrespect the values we agreed to model as a team, I feel like you don't care and are only looking after yourself.»
Often entrepreneurs start with a direct - to - customer business model, but learn that many domains only work with distributors or value - added resellers.
After all, even the best Value Propositions can only succeed with the right business model.
Reports from CCN point out that: To explain the Plasma Cash model, Buterin gives the example that if a user deposits some amount of ether to a crypto exchange or any third party service, a Plasma coin would be created with the same value of ether and a unique ID that can not be merged or split.In contrast with Plasma, Plasma Cash would only require users to pay attention to the blocks that contain coins they want to keep track of:
The analysis in Figure 1 shows DCF values for only 35 years though the model values companies for 100 years into the future.
While «operating earnings» are not even defined under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, and «forward operating earnings» only surfaced as a creature of Wall Street in the early 1980's, it's simple enough to impute historical values of forward operating earnings because they are almost completely explained by observable earnings and employment data — see Long - term Evidence on the Fed Model and Forward Operating Earnings.
Either way — I'll let you in on a secret — business ethics / morality = zero — the only ethics that actually exist in a business model exist because humans bring it with them — unless greed and stepping over people are values now?
In the face of defeat one can attempt to build and maintain some kind of community that will not only aid in physical survival but be a model of human values in stark contrast to the oppressing society.
He examines several models of ministry and estimates the total value of congregations» contributions, taking into account not only money but also volunteer, clergy and staff time spent on community issues, the donated use of space and facilities, and the like.
The only significance and value which obtain anywhere are in the mind's discernment of these fictive qualities in its own manufactured models....
It may be an arrangement that factors out different aspects of the school's common life to the reign of each model of excellent schooling: the research university model may reign for faculty, for example, or for faculty in certain fields (say, church history, or biblical studies) but not in others (say, practical theology), while paideia reigns as the model for students, or only for students with a declared vocation to ordained ministry (so that other students aspiring to graduate school are free to attempt to meet standards set by the research university model); or research university values may be celebrated in relation to the school's official «academic» program, including both classroom expectations and the selection and rewarding of faculty, while the school's extracurricular life is shaped by commitments coming from the model provided by paideia so that, for example, common worship is made central to their common life and a high premium is placed on the school being a residential community.
Located on the southwestern edge of the U.S. Corn Belt, LifeLine Foods LLC stands apart from other companies in the corn processing industry because it operates a unique business model that extracts maximum value from the corn kennel to benefit not only the food industry, but the fuel industry, as well.
Instead of investing in video - streaming technology and other innovations that could add value to the Olympics experience, NBC, their audience, and their advertisers have for now settled for the model that least disrupts the status quo, despite the fact that that status quo is a holdover from a TV - only, prime time - focused media landscape.
Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...
So it isn't an exact model: if domestic servants value productivity differs from (say) video game programmers, the price of the commodities they contribute to won't express the actual number of human hours of labour, but only the number of hours of human labour that our society (through market, production, class war) deems socially average.
I want to suggest here that the heuristic value of the «exit, voice and loyalty» model can only be preserved if one assumes that modes of power in relation to which exit, voice or loyalty gain meaning remain more or less the same.
But I still wish I had a dad who was not only around but involved; another role model to teach me what my mom did her best to instil - values like hard work, integrity, responsibility and delayed gratification - all the things which give a child the foundation to envision a brighter future for themselves... That's why I try every day to be for Michelle and my girls what my father was not for my mother and me.»
Current multiverse models agree with observations only if certain parameters are given specific values — if the forces holding matter together were slightly stronger or weaker, for instance, it would be impossible for us to be here to observe the universe.
Current models agree with observations only if certain parameters take particular values — if the forces holding matter together were stronger or weaker, for instance, the universe would not look the way it does.
Importantly, their model incorporates species interactions of LV form, like our model, but unlike our model, considers only a single set of parameter values.
The model so devised was then quantized — in other words continuous values, which may differ from one another in terms of any arbitrarily small amount, were converted to discrete values, which may only differ by specific intervals (quanta).
In the end, Archibald concludes that the warming from the next 40 ppm of CO2 rise (never mind the rest of it) will only be 0.04 degrees C. Archibald's low - ball estimate of climate change comes not from the modtran model my server ran for him, but from his own low - ball value of the climate sensitivity.
This take - make - dispose model not only leads to an economic value loss of over $ 500 billion per year, but also has numerous negative environmental and societal impacts.
Key to this model is understanding the role that public schools play, not only in educating our youth, but also in serving as the mediating institution to successfully transition immigrant families into the American way of life, into making American values, culture, norms, and language their own.
The fact remains that students will only value the importance of learning if the adults in their lives are modeling it.
There's little doubt that many education decision makers see the value of self assessment and improvement planning but in the face of changing college structures driven by area reviews and new entrants to the apprenticeship delivery market, including many who are migratingfrom sub-contracting models to direct contracting with the ESFA, a review of good practice can only be beneficial.
It's a model that advocates say is the only way to improve public education but that critics say is unworkable and even immoral when it comes to children and a valued civic institution.
Indeed, as per a statement made by Ron Adler, president of the Ohio Coalition for Quality Education, not only is it «disappointing that ODE spends so much time denying that poverty and mobility of students impedes their ability to generate academic performance... they [continue to] remain absolutely silent about the state's broken report card and continually defend their value - added model that offers no transparency and creates wild swings for schools across Ohio» (i.e., the EVAAS system, although in all fairness all VAMs and the SGP yield the «wild swings» noted).
In contrast to the traditional methods of measuring school effectiveness (including the adequate yearly progress system set up under NCLB), value - added models do not look only at current levels of student achievement.
This model values not only academic success but also students» ability to learn about themselves, healthy relationships, social responsibility, and compassion.
Moreover, the previous test scores of high school students, which are the most important variable used in value - added models, may be only weakly related to standardized or end - of - course tests.
Simple value - added models that control for just a few tests scores (or only one score) and no other variables produce measures that underestimate teachers with low - achieving students and overestimate teachers with high - achieving students.
The research supports one conclusion: value - added scores for teachers of low - achieving students are underestimated, and value - added scores of teachers of high - achieving students are overestimated by models that control for only a few scores (or for only one score) on previous achievement tests without adjusting for measurement error.
Each panel compares the rating of teachers using a value - added model with prior test scores and student covariates to placements from another model: (1) a value - added model that includes only a prior test score (Panels A and D); (2) the SGP model (Panels B and E); and (3) a value - added model that makes within - school comparisons (Panels C and F).
And, sure enough, E4E's «declaration» includes language endorsing teacher assessments using value added modeling of standardized test scores, a method which is only slightly more reliable than throwing darts randomly at a wall.
Only one model matches the level of accuracy Value - Added has on its own — and that's because observations only account for two percent of the data in the moOnly one model matches the level of accuracy Value - Added has on its own — and that's because observations only account for two percent of the data in the moonly account for two percent of the data in the model.
Your school can receive a free value - added modeling report usually only available to large districts.
Value in Its Class Value is always difficult to determine, and it only gets tougher when the model in question is a performance car, a luxury brand, an exotic or a low - volume product.
Sadly, sales of the 1955 and 1956 model only topped 2,827 units, so values of the rare C - 300 have already skyrocketed.
Again, air - conditioning on this model can only be had with the value option package that also includes larger tires, a CD stereo, cruise control, power locks, remote keyless entry, lighted vanity mirrors, and an overhead console.
This Particular Model, In This Colour Combination Must Be Considered Highly Desirable; Very Collectable and Can Only Appreciate In Value.
All the goodies you expect from a premium sports sedan costing $ 70,000 or $ 80,000 are there — only our fully loaded test car was priced at $ 48,350 and the base model starts at just $ 33,000, making it a great value, above all else.
Because when you drive off in a Certified Pre-Owned model, you're not just behind the wheel of a vehicle you can't wait to show off — you'll also have the reassurance you can only get when trusted quality and exceptional value come together to bring you something truly outstanding.
This GMC Sierra 1500 Features the Following Options SLE VALUE PACKAGE includes (AG1) driver 10 - way power seat adjuster when ordered with (AZ3) seats only, (N37) manual tilt and telescopic steering column, (BTV) Remote vehicle starter system, (T3U) LED front fog lamps, (UG1) Universal Home Remote, (C49) rear - window defogger, (KI4) 110 - volt AC power outlet, (CJ2) dual - zone climate control, (Z82) trailering equipment, and (G80) rear locking differential for 2WD models only, SLE CONVENIENCE PACKAGE includes (JF4) power - adjustable pedals, (UD7) Rear Park Assist, (C49) rear - window defogger and (A48) sliding rear window, MAX TRAILERING PACKAGE includes 9.76» rear axle, 8 - speed transmission with 3.42 or 6 - speed transmission with 3.73, (JL1) trailer brake controller, enhanced cooling radiator, revised shock tuning for increased control, heavier duty rear springs and increased RGAWR Includes (G80) heavy - duty automatic locking rear differential on 2WD models (already standard on 4WD models) and Z82 Trailering Package.
Unlike other manufacturers, VW strayed away from including bespoke equipment only available to this model and instead focused on offering options that customers choose most often as standard on the S trim levels, creating a «value package,» if you will.
With a long list of new standard and available features including a multi-angle rearview camera, Bluetooth ® connectivity, Expanded View Drivers Mirror, 7 - inch Display Audio with HondaLink ™ connectivity and LaneWatch ™ display, the Fit is an unparalleled value with an MSRP starting at $ 15,5251, representing an increase of only $ 100 over the model it replaces.
And the 2017 Tacoma was the only one of the three pickups that was named by Kelley Blue Book's KBB.com as the Best Resale Value: Midsize Pickup Truck for the 2016 model year.
Resale value is predicted to only be fair, and given these models» high starting prices, be ready for an appreciable drop in a few years» time.
Models built between 1998 and 2004 will deliver the best value, and while a six - cylinder engine was offered, stick with the 2.5 - liter, four - cylinder model and keep a close eye on its head gasket - the only real weakness with these all - weather warriors.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z