Not exact matches
Lise Meitner solved the problem of
nuclear fission — and although she never got the Nobel, she is the
only woman outside of mythology to have an element named after her alone
Only four years after German scientists discovered
nuclear fission, scientists in America took the first step toward harnessing it.
Fission, however, is not the
only nuclear option.
As a final remark - CO2 capture and storage can
only be a transitional technology - it can herald the hydrogen economy - it can also give us a choice not to use
nuclear fission whilst fusion is still being dveloped.
«The most compelling reason to look seriously at the PRISM is that it can burn all the long - lived actinides in spent
nuclear fuel, leaving
only fission products with a roughly 300 - year radioactive lifetime.
As an avid Terry Pratchett game (his books and Firefly are the
only two things I've ever claimed to be a fanboy about) I cracked open the Discworld board game with something approaching
nuclear -
fission generating levels of excitement, but I suppressed that feeling quickly because board games are an art, their design tricky to master.
As a final remark - CO2 capture and storage can
only be a transitional technology - it can herald the hydrogen economy - it can also give us a choice not to use
nuclear fission whilst fusion is still being dveloped.
Perhaps if we had an worldwide immediate embrace of the
only off the shelf significant substitute for combustion,
nuclear fission, we might start to bring those numbers down.
Current technology includes
nuclear fission, which is more than capable of dealing with global energy needs, and at costs lower than fossil — IF it were
only deployed.
The
only alternative baseload energy production technology is
nuclear fission.
Today, most alternative energy technologies that are discussed — wind, solar, tides, waves, clean coal,
nuclear fission and, perhaps one day, fusion — are useful
only for making electricity.
So let's just agree to subtract it out as completely irrelevant to a discussion of thermodynamics, unless the «air» in question is inside the core of a star that is in the peculiar state where it is fusing oxygen and nitrogen or sometimes
fissioning them with fast neutrons (the
only processes I can think of that might change their baseline mass - energy by altering their strong
nuclear interaction energy).
As for how to meet increasing demand for electricity without using more fossil fuels, I think
nuclear fission is the
only currently viable option.
The fluoride salt thorium reactor can produce
nuclear wastes that consist
only of
fission products, which quickly decay to stable elements - in fact some elements like xenon or rhodium represent valuable commercial products after a few months «cooling down».
But then I went on to envisage, at least in my own mind, a time when large fossil fuel generators had all closed own — mainly in order to avoid ruining our one and
only habitable planet — and that the 24/7 power supply would be a mix of Solar PV, solar thermal (eg CSP), wind and the lesser sources such as hydro, tidal, geothermal etc having taken over the complete electricity supply — especially since Australia doesn't have, and is almost certain never to have,
nuclear fission plants.
In real life, however, the
only way to transmute other materials into gold is through a
nuclear reactor (fusion or
fission depending upon the source materials) and you do need a permit from the
nuclear regulatory commission in the United States to build a
nuclear reactor.