The only obvious answer to this is that I highly doubt we will start throwing all these new fangled batteries into a landfill and plant trees over it.
Not exact matches
History repeatedly provides the same
answer (which, like most discoveries,
only seems «
obvious» after you've figured it out).
The
only answer is
obvious, you have nothing to offer that I can see is «Good».
Only the few of us that ask the
obvious questions later, and get really stupid or dodged
answers, gradually come to realize it's all a really wicked con.
I have
only read a few of your posts so forgive me if the
answer is
obvious, but I would sincerely appreciate and would like to consider your
answer.
In any case, the question (which is so
obvious as to not really need
answering) is, why was SHE the
only one of the pair brought before Jesus.
let's face it, everyone and his brother has known what our deficiencies have been for several years, so why can't our management team seem to identify our weaknesses and aggressively target the necessary additions... the
only plausible
answer is we aren't willing to pay even close to market value for the players we clearly need and if we do actually get to the table we seem to make insulting bids that simple infuriate the team in question... for years Wenger has said he couldn't find any world class players to fill our voids, which seems to suggest that he thinks we currently have upwards of 40 world class players on our existing roster... if that is the case he should never be in charge of making personnel decisions... buying late in the window is so problematic, for
obvious reasons, and especially since this year was supposed to be different (sarcasm)
The most
obvious answer is to wear a mouthpiece and a helmet with appropriate padding on the inside, to keep your head up,
only hit what you can see, and don't lead with your head.
Mertz should never have been our captain in the first place... who has ever heard of a team that makes 11th hour transfer buys (Arteta & Mertz) then seemingly places those same individuals into prominent leadership positions from the get - go... indicative of the problems that have permeated our clubhouse for the better part of 7 years under the Kroenke & Wenger... what is wrong with the players chosen and / or the management style of Wenger that doesn't develop and / or encourage strong leadership from within... Mertz was the fine collecting lackey from year one... this is what happens when you don't get world - class players because many times they want to have a voice on and off the pitch and this can't happen when you play for a fragile manager who has developed a coddling wage structure where everyone is rewarded for simply wearing the shirt and participating in the process... not enough balance between performance and pay, combined with the
obvious favoritism shown to some players regardless of their glaring lack of production... remember that Ramsey has played in positions that make no sense considering his skill - set (out wide) and has forced other players off the field or into equally unfamiliar positions with little or no justification (let's remember when you read articles about how Ramsey's goals this upcoming season being the potential X-factor for our success that this is the same individual who didn't score a goal until the final week last season)... this of course is just one example of many... before I hear another word from Mertz I want this club to address the fact that no former player of any real consequence has any important role in the management structure of this club, yet several former Gunners have expressed serious interest in just such an endeavor (Henry, Viera, Adams, Bergkamp... just to name a few legends)... there is
only one
answer: an extremely insecure manager!!!
If we get a result at OT and Geoff «I'm can
only ask
obvious WUM questions I already know the
answer to» Shreeves versus LvG may be a better spectacle than the Mayweather / Pac - Man fight.
This is an incredibly difficult question to
answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self,
only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have
only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was
obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so
only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
There is no real
answer to the question you have posed because this club has once again hedged their bets on doing the bare minimum then hoping for the best... if they were serious about changing the stagnant culture that has permeated the club since our move from the Highbury, we would have immediately released and / or moved several players in the early days of the window... this would have demonstrated to the fans that they were serious about addressing our
obvious inadequacies... likewise this would have forced them to bring in replacements because they couldn't have used the lame excuse Wenger is presently spewing about having too many players... we functionally have the same amount of players as we did when the window first opened but he didn't say jack about it then... he simply waited until the inevitable happened then pulled out his excuse Rolodex, closed his eyes and randomly drew the «too many players» card... the more he opens his mouth, the more I understand his «god» complex when it relates to all things Arsenal... what other manager could continually do the same dumb shit, not address
obvious concerns for years, speak to the fans in such a condescending manner, face enormous criticism from many of his former star players and be the architect of so many failed player signings yet be one of the highest paid managers with the longest tenure in Europe... maybe Kroenke is colourblind and instead of seeing all the red flags he can
only see the GREEN ones ($ $ $)
Do you want to know what the «
only white people can be racist» crowd use as a coping mechanism to explain
obvious racism in other cultures (the
answer would be doublethink)?
I could leave it at that for
obvious reasons, but I can't write out
answers and leave this one at
only one word.
It seemed
obvious to us, as it does to so many educators, that bubble - in
answers would
only ever tell part of the story and that broader, richer assessments were critical to showing the full range of a student's abilities.
First, if a book is
only available at a certain account (store), i.e., because it's self published, then the
answer is
obvious.
Well, the
obvious answer is that
only licensed brokers can buy or sell anything listed on an exchange, but the more important
answer is that successfully trading options requires a lot of in - depth research and planning.
A new Gran Turismo game would seem like the
obvious answer, of course, but Polyphony had
only just rolled GT6 out on PS3.
The
answer to the question now seems
obvious: What should the worlds biggest,
only and probably last 3DO fanboy do?
But this piece isn't about whether or not it's sexist to
only show women characters in games in their underwear (because I hope the
answer is
obvious).
Just because you are too lazy to do a full analysis and quantify all quantities and effects does not mean that we have to take the
only «
obvious» solution to the problem as the
answer:
The
obvious answer is because, if you take the uncertain risks of rapidly accellerating CO2 - concentrations and warming seriously, actions follow that are very different than those you would take based
only on resilience arguments or reducing air toxins.
Answer obvious, and pertains
only to anvils in frigid baths (or similar concepts), but it is completely irrelevant to the discussion at hand: it has NO relationship to atmospheric physics, due to «other factors,» such as convection and evaporation / condensation of water.
Given the
obvious inequality of arms between the SRA and respondents, it seems that the
answer to any SRA concerns would be to ensure cases of alleged disciplinary breaches are investigated properly and
only presented to the SDT by way of clearly formulated allegations where clear evidence exists rather than rely upon a reduction in the burden of proof.
When looking at the five - star - plus cruise ship * MS EUROPA 2, the
answer is
obvious: it is not
only the incredible itineraries, but also the time that is spent on the ship itself.
When looking at the five - star - plus cruise ship * MS EUROPA 2, the
answer is
obvious: it is not
only the incredible itineraries, but also the time that is...
The
obvious answer is of course I would buy the battleship if he had one just because I would be the
only person in Silver City, NM to own a battle ship.
The
answer is
obvious: Because that might lead to a world in which Google
only uses VP8 while Apple or Microsoft
only use H. 264.
The
obvious answer for those eager to dive headfirst into VR and AR would be a single phone with both experiences onboard, but the first phone with Tango onboard was
only built with AR in mind and would struggle to offer a quality Daydream experience.
If you
only had one interview, or the same interviewer over a couple meetings, the
answer to this is pretty
obvious.
Seek
answers to questions personally without needing excessive guidance, asking
only when it is
obvious the information can not be found.