Sentences with phrase «only obvious conclusion»

Not exact matches

Morality serves a purpose, and if the Bible leads you to an obvious conclusion that is the only logical one, then so be it, but don't believe it is the source of it.

I hesitate to draw definite conclusions about the scientific value of pursuing an impertinence such as marital virtue, especially given my obvious lack of qualifications having spent only one year in a windowless room watching monkeys copulate.

Gone are the Gloomy Gils who never had the material which was bestowed in such bounteous bundles on their opponents, yet always managed to win from that selfsame opposition, leaving the only and obvious conclusion that the coach's genius pulled it off.

The only conclusion will be that it is somewhere on your body, but unless it is obvious, you will carry on regardless, without tracking down and removing the offending feces.

But because the deus ex machina here is not only evident from the start, and because the identity of the Rainmaker is glaringly obvious, then the conclusion to the film betrays everyone in the audience by only partially observing the rules of time travel set up in earlier scenes.

Even the scripts lame attempt at a surprise is so obvious when you see which character doesn't have a child and which character says she is adopted, there is only one «soap opera» conclusion there.

One only has to read the history as found within Israeli state archives and the writings of Israel's leaders to come to this obvious conclusion.

Because of this, some of the conclusions are simple, obvious, and correct ** only ** in the parts of the business that the writer knows well, while implementing them would be an expensive mistake, even in other parts of the trade book business.

The only way to avoid the easy obvious conclusions [1]-- is willful ignorance, not being «hopelessly» uninformed.

This conclusion is often only implied, other times mentioned offhandedly, as if it is inherently obvious.

When Slide 4 is taken to the logical conclusion Lindzen seemingly wants the honourable members to draw, namely that if greenhouse gases continue on their current rise we can expect a further rise of only 0.8 C over the next 150 years, he's simply using the same linear - trend argument that Girma and Arfur Bryant love trotting out, obfuscated to make it less obvious.

Agreed and the hooks for further funding only too obvious in the conclusions of many papers.

His basic conclusion was that NZ is collectively dishonest using the «100 % Pure» slogan to attract tourists as NZ has a higher carbon impactt than the UK, despite the screamingly obvious facts that NZ has only about 4.3 m inhabitants, its major industries are grassland farming of various types plus viticulture and forestry; NZ is about a seventh larger than the UK in land mass and two - thirds of NZ is locked into National Parks, a unique mix of indigenous Podocarp forests and mountain chains.