Not exact matches
Life
on earth can
only survive
on 0.50 % of the planets volume, now compare this to the universe as a whole and life is ridiculously rare, we are an
anomaly.
Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs
on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have
only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the
only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved
on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders
on our current roster there are
only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an
anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed
on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building
on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence
on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time
on the training table as
on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought
on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could
only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've
only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that
only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger
on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...
For moms who know that their baby is suffering from a genetic
anomaly or debilitating condition, it's sometimes easier knowing that the baby that passed
on will never suffer the pain of being born,
only to struggle to live.
[1] It attempts to solve an
anomaly caused by the electoral calendar: Scotland votes
on independence
on 18 September this year, but would
only become an independent nation some time in 2016 (the Scottish government is planning for 24 March [2]-RRB-.
It attempts to solve an
anomaly caused by the electoral calendar: Scotland votes
on independence
on 18 September this year, but would
only become an independent nation some time in 2016 (the Scottish government is planning for 24 March).
A: There is a real
anomaly in the way Scottish MPs vote
on English matters - but it is
only one of countless
anomalies in our electoral system, and they all need to be addressed together as part of a new constitutional settlement.
Only one thing is certain:
On an island often described as an Eden, distinctly lacking in natural violence, the fossa is a striking
anomaly.
By focusing
only on genes, Blumberg argues in Freaks of Nature, we miss out
on everything developmental
anomalies can teach us about biological form and behavior.
Some of these
anomalies might also spark cell division, in which case focusing
on only the original one would not stifle disease.
Let's dive right into the important details: Wedding date: March Wedding location: a beach in the Caribbean My price range $ 300 — $ 400 Requirements: strapless, pure white, beachy While I could certainly afford a more expensive dress, I personally feel that it is ridiculous to spend a fortune
on a dress I will
only wear once (I think I'm an
anomaly in the fashion blogging community).
Anomaly 2's single player levels generally have you making it from point A to B early
on, and you'll initially start with
only the most basic units.
Unfortunately, as of today
only their most recent premium effort This War of Mine [$ 14.99] is
on sale for $ 2.99, however the fact that all of their games are
on sale
on Android and their Twitter suggests that this is also applicable for iOS, there is a chance that other apps such as
Anomaly 2 [$ 4.99] and
Anomaly Defenders [$ 4.99] may also drop in price soon...
Given these
anomalies and the fact that I omitted the # 6.5 m outlier from my calculations mean the average transfer fee would likely be more than # 75k per academy especially if we omit «transfers» which were
only transfers
on paper.
The
only anomaly, which I recognize from the LR2, is the raised platform
on which the seats are mounted; I felt my heels bumping up against it during longer drives.
Instead of being applied
only on an exception basis, such an advanced electric vehicle dynamics control system could deliver exceptional safety and handling at lower speeds as well as at high speeds or when correcting an
anomaly, suggested Siegfried Pint, Audi's new Head of Electric Powertrain.
«The
only anomaly we found was that higher TPR levels actually resulted in higher auto and mortgage delinquencies for subprime and near - prime mortgage borrowers, but we attribute this performance to the mortgage crisis and its impact
on the payment hierarchy — many consumers facing foreclosure placed a higher emphasis
on paying off their credit cards,» added Becker.
Some breeders feel that
only dogs that have been X-rayed and checked for spinal
anomalies should be bred from, but this is a difficult position to take sides
on.
While I
only own Lego City
on Wii U, the comparisons I've seen of the Switch version vs the PS4 / Xbone make it look better, it loads faster (still slow), has noticeably sharper textures, a new lighting engine and all round more stable framerate (
only in docked), so overall it looks better, but it has some weird
anomalies like glitchy self shadows.
Early
on in the game, you learn that all of the time - based
anomalies are caused by a creature known as the Time Eater and that time can
only truly be repaired after defeating him.
With a more realistic mixed layer depth, changing the initial condition
on temperature
anomaly only leads to a rapid adjustment period affecting the first few years.
Based
on the comparison between reconstructions and simulations, there is high confidence that not
only external orbital, solar and volcanic forcing, but also internal variability, contributed substantially to the spatial pattern and timing of surface temperature changes between the Medieval Climate
Anomaly and the Little Ice Age (1450 to 1850).
It therefore makes no sense to
only attribute changes from after the point of detection since you'll miss the first 2 sigma of the change... Similarly, we can still calculate the forced component of a change even if it isn't the
only thing going
on, and indeed, before it is statistically detectable in the global mean temperature
anomaly.
On the other hand, to represent these few
anomalies as the norm rather than the exception can
only have the purpose of increasing doubt among the lay population who may not be familiar with the overwhelming evidence.
If we can
only detect the
anomalies when there is an obvious spike in the data, and the
only people that make corrections are «denialist», doesn't that shed ANY doubt in your mind
on the integrity of the process?
I continue to believe that showing
only anomaly data, even were it accurate, is in itself misleading in the graphical depictions of what is going
on in the realm of temperature.
This mantra refers to a complex non-linear dynamic system with annual variation in forcing greater than 80Wm - 2 (20Wm - 2 for the guys that can
only think in terms of averages) repeated by «scientists» so inept at thermodynamics and statistics that they confuse confidence intervals based
on temperature
anomalies with actually uncertainty of energy flow based
on T ^ 4 relationship of the real T not the imaginary T
anomaly.
TOA flux are
anomalies —
only the direction of change is significant, there is no absolute negative or positive, the zero point is based
on an average for a period — i.e. above or below the average.
IPCC relied
on climate models (CMIP5), the hypotheses under test if you will, to exclude natural variability: «Observed Global Mean Surface Temperature
anomalies... lie well outside the range of Global Mean Surface Temperature
anomalies in CMIP5 simulations with natural forcing
only, but are consistent with the ensemble of CMIP5 simulations including both anthropogenic and natural forcing...» (Ref.: Working Group I contribution to fifth assessment report by IPCC.
All these facts, combined with the fact that the actual measurement of near - surface temperature
anomalies is
only one small metric of Earth's overall energy imbalance, and so to focus
on it at the exclusion of others which may be equally as important is a bit of a «look... squirrel!»
The warm
anomalies in June lasted throughout the entire month (increases in monthly mean temperature of up to 6 to 7 °C), but July was
only slightly warmer than
on average (+1 to +3 °C), and the highest
anomalies were reached between 1st and 13th August (+7 °C)(Fink et al., 2004).
I am still waiting for word
on what the global temperature
anomaly for the month was, but I suspect it will be fairly close to normal, which means that
on average the temperature of the Earth will come in at ~ 12.0 °C which is 4 °C colder than it will be in 6 months from now, but because of how they talk about temperature, I will be the
only one pointing out the difference between the actual temperature and the
anomaly temperature.
It is instructive to compare these numbers with those characteristic of a set of the years during 1979 — 2012 with no or
only one major regional extreme event (in terms of land surface temperature and land precipitation
anomalies) in the NH midlatitudes, from late April / early May to late September / early October, as reported yearly since 1993 in the World Meteorological Organization statements
on the status of the global climate (see also ref.
I note that from co2 levels of 375 to 395
on the bottom plot
on both graphs which is
only from 1900 [113 years not 150] the distinct leveling out of the temperature
anomaly at 1.4 degrees.
The ecosystem response of coral reefs to climatic and other disturbances is more complex than predicted by models based largely
on temperature
anomalies and thresholds
only.
March 2016 had by far the largest temperature
anomaly (1.28 °C) for any March
on record and the second highest
anomaly for any month ever, beaten
only by February 2016 (1.34 °C), hence the snarky headline.
Based
on extensive Siberian snow cover during the fall, the researchers correctly forecasted cold weather for much of the U.S., while most other forecasters predicted warm weather for the U.S.. For a comparison between predicted and observed temperature
anomalies, please see the following images: forecast temperature
anomaly Jan - Feb - Mar 2013 and observed temperature
anomaly Jan - Feb - Mar 2013, U.S.
only.
And the trouble NOAA seems have in predicting an accurate recent past is well examplified in Ole Humlums in one of the graphs
on his Climate4You website, the one he calls» the GiSS maturity graph» (link below): so it's not
only Goddard (though he shouts more and louder about it) that is critical of the slowly but unidirectionally widening gap between the past and present, as for example like in this day instance of the diffrence between the
anomalies of the two values for the same day of the month 70 years apart, as the more resent days value heads for heavenly heigth's, while the older
anomaly is clearly speeding down the higway to underworld inferno.
While the March 2010
anomaly was based
on 14,488 stations, April and May were based
on only 47 stations, all in the Antarctic (h / t Nick Stokes).
2014 was not a record for global land areas [4th
only] 2014 was not a record for the entire land oceans for Southern Hemisphere (2nd
only) It was a record
only for Northern Hemisphere oceans SST
anomalies and
only the North Pacific showed extra warming mostly as shown
on Bob Tisdale's monthly reports of Ocean SST's The North Pacific SST has risen steadily from an
anomaly of about 0.3 C in 2010 to almost 0.7 C in 2014.
And as for the «still rising» part, the average
anomaly from 2001 to the end of 2010 was 0.265
on RSS, but
only 0.183 since then, for a drop of 0.082
on the average.
Are you actually claiming that the «best efforts» of the data massagers are able to not
only tease out temperature
anomalies with hundredth degree resolution for the «annual temperature of the Earth» going back a thousand years or more, all but the most recent couple of hundred years based solely
on a variety of «proxies», but, having teased them out, are able to successfully attribute them to some specific «driver», like ACO2?
However, for changes over time,
only anomalies, as departures from a climatology, are used, most commonly based
on the area - weighted global average of the sea surface temperature
anomaly and land surface air temperature
anomaly.
BTW, NYC and Des Moines are almost
on the same latitude and
only about 1000 km apart, so by Hansen's rule you don't need the Des Moines data as it is less than 1200 km from NYC with its more convenient
anomalies.
As the stated aim of the costs management regime is to control the costs of litigation, it seems to be an
anomaly that costs are
only being managed
on the multi-track.
Currently
only North Dakota has a law in effect that bans abortion
on the basis of fetal genetic
anomaly.