Sentences with phrase «only open question»

The only open question is whether the results of the official tests will be used for high stakes accountability purposes, especially federal funding.

Elijah's initial challenge implies that the Israelites are worshiping two deities, either separately or syncretistically, but it also implies — and the people tacitly agree — that there is but one «God,» the only open question being who he is.

Next, conduct another mock interview, in which only open questions are asked («How do you think the neighborhood should be developed?»).

Not exact matches

If there are still open questions, if there are changes or mid-course corrections that must be made, if there are pricing concerns or additional critical features to be added, there's really only one person who can make those calls, meaning that the inputs to the decision - maker must be direct and, ideally, face - to - face from the market and the customers.

When listening to the responses to these behavioral, open - ended questions, listen not only to the content of the response, but also to the tone and manner behind it.

For example, The Economist has devoted this entire week to an open, online discussion devoted to the question: «Should businesses work to advance the rights of LGBT people broadly, rather than focusing only on their own employees?»

Or asking a question about how they got there, their biggest challenge, or greatest success not only gives you insight into the person with whom you are communicating, it begins to build a relationship: the foundation of most effective and open communication.»

The only preparation is to be ready to ask us the hard questions, keep an open mind during feedback and be ready to build some meaningful relationships.

The software only mines while the browser tab is open, so there is no question of users» computers being infected.

It's the ONLY option you have, since directly addressing any of these questions opens you up to an examination of the incoherency of the determinist viewpoint

But really, the Greek only says that Cain «was of» the evil one, which leaves open the question as to why Cain acted as he did.

It truly has the answers to all of life's questions if you only would approach it with an open heart and see it for what it is, not what you percieve it to be.

An answer to this question can be approximated only by open and scholarly investigation.

The events they describe could logically have been otherwise, although causally they could be only what they are They could not have been otherwise given their causal antecedents, and since the causal antecedents could not causally have been otherwise, there never were any open possibilities for the state of affairs in question other than the one which does in fact occur.

Questions not only open the door for answers, they also open the door to mystery and trouble.

Whitehead's exposition appears to be question - begging, since he appears to assume that what he describes is an (accurate) experience of CE, whereas it is an open question for the subject whether the experience is accurate or not, whether it is an experience of actual CE or only an experience believed to be of CE.

Then, too, it will presumably be possible to leave it an open question whether the history of human descent as known to us does or does not possess features which only after the Fall of the first man can be thought of to some extent as a predominance of his pre-human past and of his environment, over a sensitivity to the world around him no longer protected by the gift of integrity, and over his lack of adaptation to a particular milieu.

remains an open question; and it may be only one among many in a multiverse.

The only problem is, guests may not want to open themselves up to the dangerous questions Maron likes to ask.

Whether and how far these reflections concerning a positive relation between spirit and matter may be significant when it is a question of asking in philosophical and theological terms whether an ontological connection between man and the animal kingdom asserted by the natural sciences to be a fact, is open to an explanatory interpretation on the basis of the nature of spirit and matter, can only be judged after we have examined some aspects of «becoming» in general.

Judaism had also a canon law; but it was still in process of evolution, in the first century, and many questions were still open, were still sub judice, and the full and final elaboration of the Halakak was only in process.

It is only after the negation of the ecclesiastical and intrapsychic images of Jesus and primitive Christianity that we ourselves are thrown into the open space where genuine questioning, and hence freedom and truth, becomes possible.

Even for him the only result was an open question.

Understanding form itself as a means of grace challenges us to take another look at the sometimes forbidding wildness of the arts, to open the doors of our churches not only to obviously useful and «religious» art, but to unpredictable forms, forms that exist apart from any question of usefulness.

Unless it can be independently known that the entity under consideration could be present only in a perceptible manner, we should concede that the question of the entity's presence has been left open rather than decided negatively.

This they can accomplish only if, first of all, they honestly open their minds to what other religions have said and are still saying on the great questions of life.

This they can accomplish only if, first of all, they honestly open their minds to what other religions «on all the face of the earth» (Acts 17:26) have said and are still saying on the great questions of life.

Even if what is found throws into question the very existence of God, there is a of peace that can only come from embracing what is seen through open eyes.

This does not by any means mean the CPI is clearly committed to liberal democratic values; it only means in the right circumstances it might be possible to open the door on that question.

Here we are on relatively new ground, I think, but it is terrain which must be explored (even if not finally colonized) if we are to be able to respond constructively not only to the questions of homosexuality but to the questions of sexual life style which confront us again and again under such headings as «open marriage» or «new morality.»

I think, therefore, that however particular questions connected with our individual destinies may be answered, it is only by acknowledging them as genuine questions, and living in the sphere of thought which they open up, that we become profound.

National Open Champion Jack Fleck lasted only to the first out, was in such a savage humor that he curtly ignored the press and bawled impatiently for the locker boy when he was bothered with questions.

Childress offered only a brief statement and took no questions before sliding the No. 31 hauler door open and slipping back inside.

The only thing that bothers me about Embiid posting that, is that it opens BB up to a barrage of questions about it, and forces him to offer up an explanation.

There is no real answer to the question you have posed because this club has once again hedged their bets on doing the bare minimum then hoping for the best... if they were serious about changing the stagnant culture that has permeated the club since our move from the Highbury, we would have immediately released and / or moved several players in the early days of the window... this would have demonstrated to the fans that they were serious about addressing our obvious inadequacies... likewise this would have forced them to bring in replacements because they couldn't have used the lame excuse Wenger is presently spewing about having too many players... we functionally have the same amount of players as we did when the window first opened but he didn't say jack about it then... he simply waited until the inevitable happened then pulled out his excuse Rolodex, closed his eyes and randomly drew the «too many players» card... the more he opens his mouth, the more I understand his «god» complex when it relates to all things Arsenal... what other manager could continually do the same dumb shit, not address obvious concerns for years, speak to the fans in such a condescending manner, face enormous criticism from many of his former star players and be the architect of so many failed player signings yet be one of the highest paid managers with the longest tenure in Europe... maybe Kroenke is colourblind and instead of seeing all the red flags he can only see the GREEN ones ($ $ $)

There are questions over the long - term sustainability of both sides business plans, but whether they're the only clubs who seem to make true marquee signings anymore is a sign of their prestige of their idiocy is open to question.

It's the fans that keep sacrificing because this team can't get their head out of their own ass... please give me some examples when a top club ever let their best player leave for free at the end of a season... Wenger needs to go to PSG and get some money and talent for Sanchez so that we can end this nonsense once and for all... then he needs to publicly apologize for the way in which they handled the whole situation... if they allow Sanchez to go for free there is no way this club, under the tutelage of Kroenke and Wenger, will ever layout the necessary coin to replace such a talented player, especially considering that Wenger will be a lame - duck manager once again in the final year of his contract and we know how well that went last year... open your eyes people, Wenger has spoken publicly about how he hopes that the next manager can take this club to the next level... WHAT?!?... he then went on to speak about leaving them in the perfect position to be successful, which is one of the reasons why several pundits felt Wenger would leave after last season based on the financials and the fact that so many players had only one year left on their respective contracts... who says this shit??? If you believe you're leaving things in the best possible shape for your potential successor to achieve greatness it raises a couple of serious questions: Why can't you take things to the next level if everything is as great as you say?

With only two (for some clubs three) games until the Premier league season 2015/16 end many questions remain wide open, and the one of those, is on what place will West Ham United end after such a great season.

«I'm only answering this question once - in fact I'm not taking the question,» said Allardyce in his opening shot at his pre-match press conference to preview Monday's home match against Newcastle.

Not only has no one asked me to but, more significantly, many have wanted to ask lots of questions, which have paved the way for an open and informative dialogue about breastfeeding in general.

It sounds like her questions came from an open heart and she had only good intentions.

Nakagawa seemed to be drifting off during the conference, forcing his eyes open only to offer drawled responses to questions from a bemused group of journalists.

Beyond this, it is an open question as to whether this initiative mechanism should be limited only to constitutional issues, or rather become an agenda - setting device for generating a citizens» assembly on any broad political issue where the relevant number of signatures can be collected.

Cross-posted on techPresident At the exact instant I opened this email from him, Jim Webb came on the radio, leaving only one obvious question: is a two - fer good enough for «BINGO» in the veepstakes stature game?

On the question of redistricting and whether the GOP will stick to its pledge to former NYC Mayor Ed Koch, Skelos said only that he's willing to «take a close look at what makes the most sense» to facilitate a «fair and open process.»

Why Senator Skelos would go to such lengths to help his son remains an open question, and may be as simple and profound as a father's love for his only child.

I'm asking myself the question what Clarke is supposed to bring to cabinet, and find the only answer I can come up with is the ability to open his mouth to make suggestions as to what the government should do differently.

NIH's new 2 - year challenge grants — the only stimulus funding program open to proposals for new projects — are, Suter believes, perfect for giving «young people fresh out of their training, the hot, young Turks with the cutting - edge methodologies, an opportunity to move these very cutting - edge questions forward very, very quickly.»

Not only does their paper reveal a key insight about some of the world's most important herbivores, it also shows how collaboration opens the door to answering questions beyond the reach of individual scientists.»

The open question is why adults tended to excrete only 55 percent as much BPA.