Being significantly indebted to his manager (Jon Gries) and all - but living out of his car, Ansel agrees to kidnap their daughter and subject her to a week - long «deprogramming» session (even though
his only other attempt backfired quite publicly).
Not exact matches
In
other words, they argue that you can
only call a statement a lie if you know for a fact that the person who said it knew it was false — and that they did so in a deliberate
attempt to deceive or mislead their audience.
On greed and fear: «We simply
attempt to be fearful when
others are greedy and to be greedy
only when
others are fearful.»
Yet another was created by selling shares to foreign investors, so that any
attempt to denationalize would have to confront not
only British financial institutions and worker - shareholders, but American and
other global diplomatic pressure.
We simply
attempt to be fearful when
others are greedy and to be greedy
only when
others are fearful.
On the
other hand, those parties stressing the environment will
attempt to overcome this image, arguing that changes to Canada's environmental policy are not
only paramount, but economically feasible.
Some of this difference can be accounted for by Strategy Analytics
only tracking five large countries and Loup's
attempt to quantify shipments to
other countries as well.
The company
only promises an «investor day» — with a presentation to be posted online for
others — as part of an
attempt to educate possible buyers on the business.
Only when I began to think for myself and to question what I had been told, did I see that the «
other side» had some valid points — I simply didn't want to hear them, much less
attempt to understand them.
so, the
only time
attempting to foist your views onto
others is wrong is when it's done forcibly??
So, what is my point?To read Paul's polemic, his rhetoric and generally his theology as an end in itself, rather than his
attempt to bring
others to an experience of the living God is to me, missing the point.It seems that much of the divisiveness between believers on this blog and a few
others I visit is just that: I often read... Paul says this... hey, but Jesus says that... no, he wasn't saying that, he was saying this and so on and so on.Am I the
only one bored with this «your Mother and my Mother were hanging out clothes» approach.I think we need a little more adverb, as in maybe....
After winning a Best Supporting Actress Oscar for her wild - eyed turn as a mental patient in Girl, Interrupted, she
attempted a few
other serious acting roles but
only seemed to find blockbuster success when she took on the lead role in the feature - film adaptation of the video game Lara Croft: Tomb Raider.
as with every
other argument about christianity, if it really was
only a belief it would be of no consequence, but unfortunately so many use their religious beliefs as an excuse to
attempt to demand the rest of the population adhere to their beliefs by codifying them into civil law.
It's heartbreaking to see religious folk
attempting to exclude
others from the discussion, as if love and family, peace of heart and mind were religious prerogatives
only.
«Well aware that the opinions and belief of men depend not on their own will, but follow involuntarily the evidence proposed to their minds; that Almighty God hath created the mind free, and manifested his supreme will that free it shall remain by making it altogether insusceptible of restraint; that all
attempts to influence it by temporal punishments, or burthens, or by civil incapacitations, tend
only to beget habits of hypocrisy and meanness, and are a departure from the plan of the holy author of our religion, who being lord both of body and mind, yet chose not to propagate it by coercions on either, as was in his Almighty power to do, but to extend it by its influence on reason alone; that the impious presumption of legislators and rulers, civil as well as ecclesiastical, who, being themselves but fallible and uninspired men, have assumed dominion over the faith of
others, setting up their own opinions and modes of thinking as the
only true and infallible, and as such endeavoring to impose them on
others, hath established and maintained false religions over the greatest part of the world and through all time.»
@tea: i still do not understand why all you jesus freaks insist on making darwin the point of your anti-evolution propaganda when he
only placed the first stone; hundreds if not thousands of
other sciectists have refined and
attempted to debunk the progess of evolution along the way and all have failed to.
I wouldn't be surprised if she had been Catholic all along
only to make such an announcement and get the attention she has — in an
attempt to convert / affirm
others who question.
Well, precisely: since Sheerman says that «faith education works all right as long as people are not thatserious about their faith», it is obvious not
only that that is exactly what he is
attempting to do, but also that Bishop Roche is absolutely right (
other bishops please note) to resist him.
There are a great many resources on the multiple subjects Dorothy
attempts to cover in her books and
other self - published writings (yes, she owns the
only publisher that prints her work).
After that, the big Jeez seemed to
only be
attempting to get
others to focus on the core meanings in the book, that often gets lost in the hocus pocus.
An illustration of this may be seen in the way our
attempts to secure visible security for ourselves bring us into collision with
others; we can seek security for ourselves
only at their expense.
Otherwise the
only way to view those wars, is as all
other wars — one group of thugs
attempting to kill another group of thugs, both doing so in the name of their own ego, misappropriating whatever political, religious, and social pressure and propaganda they can, to their cause.
A man who, for some reason, feels the need perpetually to humiliate people will not find any explanation for that need in the actual
attempts to humiliate
others: he will
only find it in the inferences which might be derived from the motives which lead him to behave in that way.
Any
attempt to stop the research entirely (in
other countries as well as in the United States) would not
only be unrealistic, it would be contrary to basic commitments of the Christian faith - ab6ut God and the world.
And not
only this; since each of these considerations readily becomes too abstract in character, is he not obliged as the next step to
attempt to will, one after the
other, each of these goals in order to find out what is the single thing he is to will, if it is a matter of willing
only one thing?
In his recent book in which he argues the role of women, he claims that he has tried to appeal «
only to Scripture, not to physiology, psychology, or sociology» as many
others do.54 As Jewett
attempts to let Scripture mold his thought, however, he finds within the writings of St. Paul inconsistencies relating to the role and place of women in the church and home.
Not
only so; he seems to have discouraged
attempts on the part of
others to give him the title, though he may not always have been in a position to silence them.
She also had been drawn to the suffering of
others,
attempting to become a nurse with Florence Nightingale in 1854 and failing to do so
only because of her young age.
Indeed,
only the most superficial observer would
attempt to describe him without reference to an indeterminate group of persons quite
other than him, most of them past, as to Thomas Jenson, buried at Clifton, Texas, or to Lena Nerhaugen, buried in Mt. Olive Cemetery in Chicago.
In
other words, if it can be shown that it is contingent that anything at all exists, then not
only will the particular effort Hartshorne has made be refuted, but any further
attempts would be ruled out a priori.
Chemical dependency and
other forms of addiction frequently result from maladaptive
attempts to find the solace that comes
only from a spiritual relationship with the God who is there.
Not
only is Fr Tolhurst encouraging the faithful to use the Catechism as a living document, something that is integral to maturation of faith, but he is also
attempting to equip us to answer questions about our faith that
others may ask of us:
In the theology of Karl Barth, for example even though scientific discoveries are affirmed within the realm proper to science, the
only way to know God is through God's free decision to reveal herself / himself in Jesus Christ; any
other way of
attempting to know God, such as through the exercise of human reason, of which science is an example, is pretentious idolatry on the part of humans trying to play God.
It is
only the
attempt of
others to convert me, that I find abhorrent.
Only then can the relationship between God and God's people be of such direct intimacy as to make the pious
attempt of
others to serve as intermediaries seem like a meddling intrusion upon married love: «No longer shall each man teach his neighbor and each his brother saying «Know the Lord,» for they shall all know me, from the least of them to the greatest.»
Not
only are they inherently hypocritical but they are arrogant to the point of outrageousness in their
attempt to shove a belief down the throats of
other people in the absence of credible evidence.
For we shall be inclined, if not certainly driven, to put temporary and proximate «goods» in the place belonging
only to the absolute Good which is God; and as a result we shall
attempt to live without regard for that last and ultimate environment which is the
only «safe» context for all
other values and goals that we may set ourselves.
Simply because the datum «God» is more diffuse and complex than
other more simple and finite structures, it does not mean that our experience of Him is unreal or that our
attempt to symbolize this experience is meaningless.31 It
only means that this datum does not submit to as high a degree of specification as
other datum.
Many are the people who
attempt to do this
only to find the crises of
others too overwhelming.
[16] This was a sincere and open
attempt to set out not
only the theological understanding of that which divided various traditions, one from the
other, but also to suggest theological and practical guidelines toward overcoming such divisions.
You said, «It's
only interesting if both parties set aside their differences and biases and openly
attempt to understand the
other as opposed to name - calling and closed - mindedness.»
It's
only interesting if both parties set aside their differences and biases and openly
attempt to understand the
other as opposed to name - calling and closed - mindedness.
In
other words, these biblical stories, which are not self - conscious literary creations but genuine emergents from the experience of a religious community — these stories are
attempts to express an understanding of the relation in which God actually stands to human life, and they are true in any really important sense
only if that understanding is correct.
And
only some such openness of Christians to
other religions will give any fruitful meaning to the present earnest
attempts at encounter.
It may be an arrangement that factors out different aspects of the school's common life to the reign of each model of excellent schooling: the research university model may reign for faculty, for example, or for faculty in certain fields (say, church history, or biblical studies) but not in
others (say, practical theology), while paideia reigns as the model for students, or
only for students with a declared vocation to ordained ministry (so that
other students aspiring to graduate school are free to
attempt to meet standards set by the research university model); or research university values may be celebrated in relation to the school's official «academic» program, including both classroom expectations and the selection and rewarding of faculty, while the school's extracurricular life is shaped by commitments coming from the model provided by paideia so that, for example, common worship is made central to their common life and a high premium is placed on the school being a residential community.
’10 Elsewhere he identifies the evolutionary thought which he opposes as «a basic acceptance of technical rationality».11 He speaks of Wolfhart Pannenberg's «extremely valuable
attempt to develop a universally historical hermeneutics», complaining
only that his «anticipation of a total meaning in history as... too little interrupted or irritated by what is described in the apocalyptic tradition as a universal catastrophe, in
other words, the reign of the Antichrist».12 Metz is more open to an Overview than some of his statements imply.
And verse 24 is concerned
only to say that Aaron is the co-star with Moses in the Sinai act and, in distinction from verse 22, that Moses and Aaron alone with no priests attending, enter the Presence; and furthermore that any
others attempting to join this company of two will find themselves «broken out against» by the Lord himself.
Before anyone
attempts to judge me, don't forget that judgment upon
others is also a sin and should
only be left to our Holy Father.
Where tradition is flouted and the rigid forms and categories of divine revelation are seen as malleable, it makes sense that
attempted correctives will
only commit the very error they intend to resolve, unconsciously swinging from one extreme to the
other.
Part of the reason is that the
attempt at objectivity (the reason the court is not in Bosnia or any
other nation that has experienced genocide) relativizes not
only the meaning of justice but also the action of it.