There are
only particular religions.
Not exact matches
In a New York Times blog, Ross Douthat notes that Pew created two nonbeliever categories instead of one: the much publicized atheist / agnostic category (which got 21 out of 32 religious knowledge questions right) and a much larger category of respondents who described their
religion as «nothing in
particular» (which got
only 15 right — a bit below the national average of 16 correct answers).
«
Only for those interested in my
particular slant on
religion (and who are new to my
particular way of Googling
religion)
but even if you were right, the simple fact that
only one can be right, doesn't make the existence of God any more or less likely — your leap from a
particular religion might be wrong to God does not exist is not maintainable.
If
religion can never set secular policy, the religious argument against same sex marriage
only affects those that adhere to that
particular religion.
Let me write this again «
RELIGION IS FAITH BASED» which not
only means having faith in God but also having faith in that
particular religions ability to properly interpret the Word of God.
That
religion, or the duty which we owe to our Creator, and the manner of discharging it, can be directed
only by reason and conviction, not by force or violence, and therefore all men have an equal, natural and unalienable right to the free exercise of
religion according to the dictates of conscience, and that no
particular religious sect or society ought to be favored or established by law in preferrence [sic] to others.
erience that
ONLY my friends who are not attached to a
particular tradition, and understand the phrase «
religion in the abstract,» will usually have read more than one of those book, taken more than one seriously, or shown any intellectual honesty or maturity about the subject at all...
It's my experience that
ONLY my friends who are not attached to a
particular tradition, and understand the phrase «
religion in the abstract,» will usually have read more than one of those book, taken more than one seriously, or shown any intellectual honesty or maturity about the subject at all...
Any rule, based in any
religion,
only applies to those that follow that
particular religion.
The kid is right in a way
Religion is a way to enslave people to the thinking of that
particular religion Jesus didn't come to form
religion but to give us a way to get to Heaven through him The
only mission of a church is to teach you about God's love to help the poor to love one another to do things that Christ would do There is a penalty for not being saved by the blood of Jesus There will be a separation from God for all eternity God made us for one reason to love Him the Creator of all The meaning of life
Only 1.6 of the 16.1 % describing themselves as unaffiliated to a particular religion are actually atheist (Believe in no Deity) and only 2.4 are agnostic (Need proof of the existence of a Dei
Only 1.6 of the 16.1 % describing themselves as unaffiliated to a
particular religion are actually atheist (Believe in no Deity) and
only 2.4 are agnostic (Need proof of the existence of a Dei
only 2.4 are agnostic (Need proof of the existence of a Deity).
To the credit of the authorities, and in part because of the international sympathy aroused by an unusual amount of publicity, significant steps were taken to, ameliorate the plight of the victimized women; nevertheless, the incident clearly dramatizes not
only the vulnerability of women to this
particular form of violence but also the injustice of a culture, sanctioned by
religion, which regards the woman's sexual integrity as primarily the concern of husbands and male relatives whose honor is at stake: bluntly, she is property, not a full person in her own right.
Not
only that, but any hanging crucifix would discriminate against the followers of other
religions, Muslims in
particular.
Religion and the supernatural have not been able to generate one single testable hypothesis, nor has it ever been able to enhance the social well being of all people...
only the few that support the
religion that dominates that
particular geographical region, and that's because historically they've been free to kill those that disagree.
posting
only one of the many religous symbols is showing favoritism to that
particular religion.
He distinguishes between early and late apostasy; between «shallow» apostasy that rejects a
particular religion but retains a form of spirituality, and «deep» apostasy that concludes there is no deity at all; and between the «mild» apostasy of those who were
only nominally religious in the first place and the «transforming» apostasy of those who had been seriously committed to the faith they later abandoned.
In short, in a monotheistic
religion, the term God not
only names Being or Being - Itself, it also names an individual entity, a
particular being.
In the case of Cardinal Brady, the media made the most of the anti-Catholic hysteria it stoked up; in the other, they scarcely dared mention the
religion of those accused,
only - and for a very
particular reason - their race.
The truth of no
particular religion could be taught -
only the fact that
religions claim truth.
My concern is not
only with grand cosmological interpretations of how the universe came to be and what it is likely to become, nor
only with sociobiological interpretations of the basis of morals and
religions, but also with more
particular biochemical genetic research and neurosciences.
For now one
particular form of
religion (certainly not the
only form) is being used in an attempt to tyrannize over other forms of religious or philosophical belief.
An early voice to raise the alarm about the emerging threat of Nazi Germany, she was an outspoken critic of appeasement, telling the House in 1933 that the NSDAP were «inflicting cruelties and crushing disabilities on large numbers of law - abiding peaceful German citizens, whose
only offence is that they belong to a
particular race or
religion or profess certain political beliefs.»
In
particular, «
religions, which exist in Indonesia» are the
only valid
religions, and practicing similar
religions but «which deviate the mainstream teachings and practices of the
religions» is not allowed.
Putting your
particular wants and needs first is Match's goal, so not
only do they let you search by your preferred age, gender, and location but also by
religion.
For example in the Refugee Convention an individual can
only apply for surrogate protection when they posses a «well - founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race,
religion, nationality, membership of a
particular social group or political opinion.»
The benefits of mastering
particular domains of history, engaging with specific texts chosen by teachers from a rich menu of options, and undertaking a systematic study of not
only math and science, but also geography,
religion, and philosophy, would be substantial.
«Where, as here, aid to parochial schools is available
only as a result of decisions of individual parents, no «imprimatur of state approval,» can be deemed to have been conferred on any
particular religion, or on
religion generally.»
In a country where cultural pluralism is not
only commonplace, but encouraged and nurtured, should schools be allowed to skew a world
religion program to meet its own
particular bias?
(The Tribunal accepted that it could insist on its morals if it provided service
only to members of the
particular religious belief, or if its purpose was to give instruction in its
religion — the reason why Catholic schools can fire teachers who divorce.)