Sentences with phrase «only person concerned»
It means that you are the only person concerned with your long - term financial stability.
http://www.homebuyinginstitute.com/ Not exact matches
These vary during the different phases of well development and have different scales of impact: Vibration may affect only people very close to wells, whereas stress from, for example, concerns about possible water contamination may have a wider reach.
In restaurants, only a small handful of customers complain in the hopes of getting a discounted meal or free service... but most people only express a concern if they truly feel unhappy or uncomfortable.
If there are still open questions, if there are changes or mid-course corrections that must be made, if there are pricing concerns or additional critical features to be added, there's really only one person who can make those calls, meaning that the inputs to the decision - maker must be direct and, ideally, face - to - face from the market and the customers.
Generally the only people who need to be concerned are those who have been building links on an industrial scale with links from bad neighborhoods and low value link directories.
The only people local businesses are concerned with are those who are able to buy their product or service, so there's a reason why many haven't seen social media marketing as the most valuable use of their time and money.
And we told him we were concerned that the American people had been misled about what General Flynn had done, and that we weren't the only ones who knew about this.»
Organizations such as the Canadian Association of Optometrists say only doctors should be responsible for issuing medical aides (which it believes glasses and contacts are), and have expressed concern this change will lead to people skipping eye exams, which could delay the diagnosis of serious eye disease.
The test has genetic counselors and scientists concerned, because there are thousands of mutations associated with the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes and this test screens for only three of them most commonly found in people of Ashkenazi (Eastern European) Jewish descent.
They consistently emphasize and over index on people's titles and credentials and forget that -; unless you're only concerned with window dressing and PR -; the object of the board - building exercise is to get some regular help, a sympathetic ear or two, and some people on your team who've been there before, who will tell you the truth when necessary, and who share your vision for the business.
Lastly only data results that would concern me is the clientele bias of Personal Capital and it's not an issue as long as you consider who is signing up for PC, my guess is the that most people who sign up have positive net worth's, someone who receives a welfare or unemployment check is highly unlikely to want to know their net worth.
But all sorts of other things can have an impact on whether people complain, seemingly unrelated or only peripherally - related issues or events like Cambridge Analytica, concerns about privacy and so on.»
Similarly, if many people voice the same concern and it isn't addressed, employees not only will be upset about the lack of change but also will be irritated they took the time to express how they felt for what appears to be no reason.
SEAN HANNITY: My question is, are you concerned within the process of this, we did discover that a foreign national, Christopher Steele, was paid through Fusion GPS, used Russian sources that not only weren't verified, but were debunked — are you concerned that was paid for, to manipulate the American people in the lead - up to an election?
Each person is only concerned about themselves, and their material consumption.
Publishers are not protected if their site is managed or operated «with the intent to promote or facilitate the prostitution of another person...» Thus, the exception only affects those who operate with criminal intent, a standard that shouldn't cause much concern in the internet industry.
His ban from visiting Britain in June 2009 has made him the «poster child» for free speech, not only for Americans concerned about the cultural shift towards totalitarianism and their rights to freedom of expression, but for people around the globe.
«Demand will only grow because people's concern about health is getting stronger, it's getting more widespread and that's what we want to see.»
Second, our culture is inherently hostile to those whose only interest is to push an agenda without a real concern for the person.
Through your reasoning, the person would only be concerned with their offspring in a detached utilitarian way.
But I'm pretty sure one doesn't need to force their religious laws on other people to have their belief, which is the only thing we're really concerned about.
People (like me) that believe in God should only concern ourself with anyone interested in learning about God.
This may come as a suprise to you, but many people in the world do not support organizations that not only had an pandemic of pedophilia cases, but the organization itself was more concerned on hiding the criminals and silencing the victims rather that putting an end to the problem.
Schwoyer made the point that many people think of homosexuals as concerned only with lust.
Concerning miracles, one might say that one kind, such as restraining a person from falling off a cliff, requires only coercionb.
Yet the so - called Christians that Ryan associated himself with for 19 years were really only concerned about people who viewed things the way they did... and had no love for him.
Ours is indeed a consumeristic culture, the kind that too often turns people into commodities, and I believe Christians can speak into that culture in a unique, life - giving way — not only as it concerns sex - on - demand, but also as it concerns food - on - demand, celebrity - on - demand, stuff - on - demand, cheap - goods - on - demand, pornography - on - demand, entertainment - on - demand, comfort - on - demand, distraction - on - demand, information - on - demand, power - on - demand, energy - on - demand, and all those habits that tend to thrive at the expense of the dignity and value of our fellow human beings or our planet.
To paraphrase Jesus» comment, people who are concerned only with the affairs of this world often show more ingenuity in seeking their ends than religious people do in trying to accomplish God's will.
First, its premisses concerning society and modern man are pseudoscientific: for example, the affirmation that man has become adult, that he no longer needs a Father, that the Father - God was invented when the human race was in its infancy, etc.; the affirmation that man has become rational and thinks scientifically, and that therefore he must get rid of the religious and mythological notions that were appropriate when his thought processes were primitive; the affirmation that the modern world has been secularized, laicized, and can no longer countenance religious people, but if they still want to preach the kerygma they must do it in laicized terms; the affirmation that the Bible is of value only as a cultural document, not as the channel of Revelation, etc. (I say «affirmation» because these are indeed simply affirmations, unrelated either to fact or to any scientific knowledge about modern man or present - day society.)
It makes no sense to argue concerning god it only divdes people.
With its concern for historical truth and invocation of the need to facilitate the cultivation of the human person and society, «Mapping» at this point comes tantalizingly close to this vision only to fall back into statements that «the fundamental sources of value in a culture are neither necessary nor universal.»
Faced with these plans to pursue liberal globalisation, which does not concern the people at all, we must independently develop our own proposals for alternatives, based on social struggle which only the victims of the system can lead.
Arguing about why shit happens only diverts time and energy away from the thing all people of good will, regardless of their faith or nonfaith, should be concerned with, the thing all of us have some control over: what happens after shit happens.
We accepted the lies of satan ourselves because God has bestowed us with free will.We seek magnification of ourselves in everything as satan did.All our actions are aimed at impressing fellow people so as to derive love and care from them.This hurts other people when we are concerned only with our satisfaction and also, people couldn't love unconditionally without first receiving christ's love (we love because he loved us first).
I have no use for these people, because when push comes to shove... they are only concerned about themselves...
Martin Buber says Paul sees faith as the only condition of salvation so that personal holiness and salvation become the sole concern, and the sphere of the person is separated from that of public affairs.10
Concerning Nicaragua, it means that we listen less to high - decibel advocates for the administration and for the Sandinistas, and we listen more to people who offer ways to peace without supposing that all would be well if only Managua would cry «Uncle,» or if only Washington would emulate a dove.
Following Brands's logic, this death is strange since the patient was never really alive to begin with, but existed only parasitically upon people's concern with national survival.
We are concerned with the word «entry» in Whitehead's statement, for persons do not only enter into the concrete, we endure in the concrete.
Instead of representation in Congress, we get every concern and issue ignored in favor of the very richest most powerful people who violate our representation by bribing Congressmen to abandon their sworn duty and represent only them instead of all Americans.
Leadership is discovered, not only when a church is bombed in Montgomery, or a woman refuses to go to the back of a bus, but when large numbers of persons are moving to communicate with one another and to find expression for their concerns.
The witness of both Old and New Testaments makes clear that concern for those forced to live a marginal existence is not - an optional activity for the people of God, nor is it only a minor requirement.
The same is true of many media reform efforts: by attempting to get people excited about liberal bias in the news, or nudity or profanity in a particular program, or the ideological bent of a certain series, or whether a network is «Christian,» concerned leaders have diverted the attention of viewers from the most important problem, the basic point, namely, that the whole process - of - television is providing us with a worldview which not only determines what we think, but also how we think and who we are.
Well can tell you that those are hard working people in a difficult and hard enviroments only to achieve their daily needs for bread and water and not concerned with politics or imposing their views on others.
A person might be concerned only for himself and interested in the other only as means to his own ends, or he might actually be concerned about the other to such a point as to be willing to sacrifice his own ends.
Speaking only for myself I would judge that the person must not have been concerned enough about the consequences at the time they committed the act to have prevented themselves.
These are our neighbors, our friends, our people, and yet we would rather rationalize away our responsibility by allowing ourselves to be swayed by special interests, big business and lobbyists whose only concern is how much money they can make.
The background assumption of this book means, finally, that so far as its content is concerned the best hope of saying things of general relevance to persons involved in all types of theological schooling today lies in making some particular and fairly concrete proposals that may turn out to be directly pertinent only to a few types of theological schools but may provoke and help other persons in other types of schools to think through these issues for themselves.
Thus it came not only to mean a concern for a person's psycho - social (as well as physical) well - being, but it came also to include some practices which remain untested and which strike some as quackery.
Oh, that's right, we can't, because the GOP is all about telling people that Christians are the only people in this country who matter, and that the First Amendment isn't really concerning religious freedom, but the freedom to pick what ever flavor of Christianity you choose.