Sentences with phrase «only piece of evidence»

When you are one of many job applicants, your resume is the only piece of evidence you can use to show off your talents and knowledge to hiring managers.

Unfortunately, the only piece of evidence pointing to the existence and imminence of this truly full - screen powerhouse is a suspiciously high - quality render.

Not yet, at least, based on the swift disappearance of the only piece of evidence supporting its existence.

It is often the only piece of evidence, and the prosecution's investigators will not give it up without a fight.

It would be less important if the hockey stick was the only piece of evidence that was suspect, but such is not the case.

Second, the only piece of evidence that Fordham presents to support the claim that state testing requirements improve performance at choice schools is the finding that scores rose when Milwaukee private choice schools were required to take the high stakes state test.

But the only piece of evidence that dietary intake of vitamin B12 can trigger acne is the study showing that acne patients had 30 % higher levels in their blood than average.

The only piece of evidence we lack about witch hazel's power as an acne clearing topical treatment is a direct study on acne itself.

This isn't the only piece of evidence that proves it's too soon to contemplate the demise of email marketing.

Not exact matches

One of the most damning pieces of evidence against Sears was that it sold too few tires at regular prices — only 1 % to 2 % of total sales.

The record of that meeting is only one piece of evidence in an unexamined history that is sure to make Americans cringe.

But the FBI's statement is the latest piece of evidence that many people not only saw red flags in Cruz's behavior but tried to report them — and those warnings were not thoroughly pursued or fell on deaf ears.

Since no one has yet to SEE an atom, the idea of the structure of the atom can only be inferred by experimental evidence — yet I see no Republican trying to stop teaching the structure of the atom in school — oh that's right, its because major corporations and industries rely on this science (pharm, weapons manufacturers etc etc) whereas the theory of evolution is merely think piece of scientists on how life on Earth changes over time.

Your second option is to throw out all that evidence, say it rained for a really long time to create the big flood and have no earthly way of explaining how it could happen and then your only real issue is the explanation of how noah was able to fit every piece of flora and fauna onto his ark, his family and enough food to survive for 40 days at sea.

The most telling piece of evidence is its success in producing power, in not only understanding but transforming nature.

(ii) you, JW, have a startling new piece of evidence that was right before our eyes that will turn accepted biological science and about 10 other sciences on their heads if ONLY people would listen to you, no doubt earning you a Nobel Prize and a place in history beside the likes of Darwin, Newton and Einstein; or

Wenger put ozil on the wing for his development one thing i do nt get is how the fans do nt see that Wenger done the same process with Wilshere, I remember when Monreal was caught out at the back post from a set piece and ozil did nt cover he just jogged abit n let monreal get beat, that would be video evidence for Ozil to learn and work on his duty to defend instead of giving him Candy like a baby n letting him be lazy in the middle not tracking back for the team its a learning process im 100 % Wenger knows ozils best position is in the centre he followed him since Shalke its obvious but Wenger develops players into world class after seeing Ozil in the world cup and coming back after the world cup i coud see he defended alot more helping out monreal on the flanks and putting in alot more effort only then once hes showed his duty in defending will he be given his free role in the middle.

«DNA evidence is only one piece of the information the courts require for a successful prosecution.

Finally, for a little piece of evidence that isn't my opinion: eHarmony, a huge dating service that has millions of women's opinions, will only match women with men who are at least as tall as they are.

But not only does it work just fine as a one - off, it's another strong piece of evidence that neither the series nor its overseer are in danger of losing ground in their battle for creative and financial supremacy.

A heavyset woman will only give Rob a potentially vindicating piece of evidence if he sates her voracious sexual appetite.

These are just the latest pieces of evidence, and only those studies to which one or more of us has contributed since we last wrote about this in RHSU two years ago.

«And that's a really important thing around the data walls and data, it is only ever one piece of evidence.

This is true, but this is true only in that such correlations offer only one piece of validity evidence.

Recording teacher performance not only provides a common piece of evidence, but according to Harvard University's Best Foot Forward study, teachers felt that the administrators who used video were more likely to evaluate them fairly.

Only days after we reported that the BMW M2 was rumored for production, a piece of hard evidence in the matter emerged.

How many times have you picked up a self - published novel for which you paid a precious portion of your paycheck (no matter how small) only to discover spelling errors, typesetting errors, continuity errors, plot holes, or other examples of bad editing — or evidence the piece was never edited at all?

[1] Although Longcore et al. seem eager to cite Churcher and Lawton's now - classic work as «evidence» of the damage cats can do, they make no mention of Churcher's later comments (just one of many examples of their tendency to «cherry pick» from the literature only the bits and pieces that fit neatly into their argument).

If you're under 16 years - of - age or submitting an application for a minor under the age of 16, there are additional pieces of evidence that must be submitted with the application, and the passport will only be good for five years instead of the standard 10.

The Tonnara was an active tuna fishing factory until the 1980's and is now possibly one of the only intact pieces of evidence of a traditional Mediterranean tuna fishery.

However, Nico can not enter the art gallery as the investigator's guard has been instructed to not allow anyone in; when you figure out a rather amusing way past the guard, you will find that the investigator is only interested in blood related evidence which you deliberately falsify using tomato source from the underside of a pizza box that was conveniently dropped on the floor by George earlier on, although the tomato source does have a piece of chewing gum stuck in the centre of it that has to be removed with Nico's press card.

It wasn't until an eccentric but dedicated historian writing a paper for a renowned academic journal (Retro Gamer issue 63) pieced together the complete saga of Willy's heroic exploits from fragments of scattered evidence - in the form of obscure retellings of the «Manic Miner» folk fable in ancient languages readable only via long - obsolete machines - that the whole truth was finally revealed.»

The only way to advance in Monster Hunter is by acquiring drops, and as evidenced by Austin's piece yesterday documenting our own encounter with Nergigante, some of the later fights are not only physically and emotionally taxing, but they can take more than 30 minutes to finish!

Nevertheless, players only need to find the clues that will give Ronan the answer he is searching for, and they only need to worry about choosing the wrong piece of evidence if they care about achieving a perfect rank.

Across the street at the New Museum, only a few examples, such as Kerstin Brätsch's large scale oil on paper pieces, Kitty Kraus» light bulb and mirror boxes commanding large areas of the third floor and Tala Madani's small scale oil paintings evidence a similar confidence in the object as a vehicle.

I know in medical statistics, if you have a whole lot of weak evidence, from a lot of different measures or theories, all suggesting there's something going on not yet well understood, it's more convincing that if you have only one piece of weak evidence that's easy to dismiss as being that one - in - twenty accidental blip.

«The Global Restructuring of Science as a Marketplace of Ideas» Trust in Science workshop CBC Conference Centre, Toronto, Ontario 2007 in over a decade only 3,608 views, as usual, becuase it is too hard to comprehend and verify the already known evidence piece by piece, and besides that, it's too hard for «scientists» to swallow, basically it is NOT in their Field.

The clear seasonality in TCs («hurricane season») with highest activities during the summer is one of the strongest pieces of empirical evidence that higher temperatures give more favourable conditions for tropical cyclones (After all, TCs only form in the warm tropics...).

The fact that no other forcing can account for said warming is not the logical argument for the veracity of the theory, it is only one piece of information that confirms the conclusion that all of the other evidence points to.

In this interview, we can see that the debate is not between some scientists and other scientists, but rather between those that look at all the evidence and those that really only look at the pieces of the evidence that fit their perspective or agenda.

Einstein's criteria that if only one piece of empirical evidence does not agree with a theory then the theory is wrong has validated the logical case that has proved the falsehood of AGW.

That evidence completely contradicts the wind industry lie that turbine hosts never, ever complain; a piece of propaganda cooked up by its media manipulators — including a former tobacco advertising guru — who run the story that it's only «jealous» wind farm neighbours who complain about wind turbine noise, «jealous» because they're not getting paid.

But if that's all you do, you've only (if you're correct) invalidated a single piece of evidence, not disproved a larger theory with multiple streams of evidence supporting it.

The Scientific Guide to Global Warming Skepticism looks at both the evidence that human activity is causing global warming and the ways that climate «skeptic» arguments can mislead by presenting only small pieces of the puzzle rather than the full picture.

In a new entertaining development inadvertently reinforcing the problem that these memos are the only «smoking gun evidence» indicting skeptic climate scientists of industry - funded corruption, Desmog's 1/29/17 piece trumpeted the arrival of former Western Fuels CEO Fred Palmer to the Heartland Institute.....

For me the most convincing piece of evidence that global warming has been contributing already to more and more intense weather related natural catastrophes is the fact that while we find a steep increase in the number of loss relevant weather events (about tripling in the last 30 years) we only find a slight increase in geophysical (earthquake, volcano, tsunami) events, which should not be affected by global warming.

Except in climate science where there truly seems to have been a cabal of bad actors (Climategate being only one piece of evidence, Steve McIntyres audits another, Marcotts Science papaer being a recent example) I would think that the normal process of science self corrects errors in time.

The strongest single piece of evidence for the IPCC «mostly human warming» statement is the claim that the models can only replicate the warming using the GHG increases, which are posited to be of human cause.

But it is only a small piece of the evidence that includes record CO2 levels, rapidly shrinking ice caps, warmer oceans, and rising seas.

By accepting the certificate of analysis into evidence without first allowing defense voir dire / cross examination questioning of the machine operator accepts that attestation clause as reliable without allowing the defendant not only to challenge not only whether the witness is reliable, credible and with sufficient recall, but also to challenge whether the witness properly and according to DFS procedure operated this claimed sophisticated piece of machinery that thusly requires a commensurate level of sophistication in understanding the machinery and using it.