Sentences with phrase «only point i want»

The only point I want to make is that libraries do pay for all the books they are able to lend or download to readers.

The only point I wanted to make in bringing it up was that scientists when speaking as scientists should stick to neutral and objective, but a lot don't.

Not exact matches

«The problem many companies have is not understanding the customer's point of view, only understanding their personal point of view in terms of what they want to accomplish.»

Only one thing is really standing in the way at this point: «The biggest challenge to adopting that is really for [wireless] operators to come up with a good way to manage your plan, because clearly you don't want to pay another $ 50 a month just to get a SIM card.»

Tran wanted to make sure couriers, who are his startup's only human point of contact with customers, would feel loyal toward the company, represent it well, and be available when needed.

Most sites want long - term relationships; not only is it easier from an administrative point of view, it also fosters site continuity and helps grow their reader base.

«If people want to correctly point out our flaws as a company, they will only be joining my previous admissions.

At a certain point though this not only becomes difficult, but also counter-productive toward building the strong culture and relationships that any founder wants to instill within their organization.

If any bond you wanted to sell is either offered only, or down more than a point on the bid side, but HYG or JNK have barely budged, you sell them.

If companies want to attract the best and the brightest, then it only makes sense for companies to tap into the technical skills women have to offer,» Whitney points out.

The Prime Minister only wants you to be his «point man».

If at some point you want to run more than just a split test (comparing only two variables), this tool will allow you to add as many variations as you'd like to analyze significance on each of them.

Only want to use points or miles for upgrades or pay for flights on long haul flights.

Reports from CCN point out that: To explain the Plasma Cash model, Buterin gives the example that if a user deposits some amount of ether to a crypto exchange or any third party service, a Plasma coin would be created with the same value of ether and a unique ID that can not be merged or split.In contrast with Plasma, Plasma Cash would only require users to pay attention to the blocks that contain coins they want to keep track of:

I totally agree with numbe 1 — we had «reward» cards that cost us thousands in interest and fees each year, only for a few airlines points that we couldn't use on the flights we wanted anyway!

None of the Bloomingdale's cards have any tiers of spending - only point accumulation, which is great news for those who don't want to spend thousands of dollars before they see savings.

It is only normal the European Parliament wants to get involved in these matters, as they may need to establish a regulatory framework for this technology at some point in the future.

(I only have cash and equities) I want an easy option and am on the point of increasing my bond holdings by settling on say, one of Vanguards» Lifestrategy funds when... «the more I read the more confused I get!»

Certainly the Japanese, so its all being done so — with the — Donald Trump wanting to turn around the trade deficit, you can't help but say hey maybe they are actually onto something because they have an independent central bank well --(unintelligible) the independent central bank that goes upon its course based on what its seeing here you know based on domestic economic activity, while everybody else is setting it to international standards then tariffs become the — I guess the alternative especially when the feds is raising the interest rates and they're the only central bank really raising interest rates... I know... the bank of England went half a basis point, quarter basis point and they are project to go a quarter basis point tomorrow which we will see.

We not only want to reveal to investors which firms are undervalued (both on a discounted cash flow and relative value basis), in our view, but we also want to provide investors with the information needed to anticipate entry and exit points.

After pointing out that they should want her to be a good negotiator, Sheryl recounts saying, «This is the only time you and I will ever be on opposite sides of the table.»

Jordan points to a quote by Montesquieu: «If we only wanted to be happy it would be easy; but we want to be happier than other people, which is almost always difficult, since we think them happier than they are.»

Only when I began to think for myself and to question what I had been told, did I see that the «other side» had some valid points — I simply didn't want to hear them, much less attempt to understand them.

The only thing I would want to add is that it is written from the point of view of a believer.

At that point, it was about masturbation only (no one had made a comparison to homosexuality), so, without much personal stake in the debate, I thought to myself «See, this is why people don't like the answers, not (always) because it doesn't let them do what they want, but because the answers are sometimes very poor indeed.»

The only things that points to any «god» are lazy, underdeveloped minds like yours that just want to conveniently fill in the gap with «goddidit» instead of tracing cause after cause backward to the beginning with provable, empirical EVIDENCE.

So if you only ask for what God would want and presume that everything is already as God intends, then what is the point of praying?

There's really no point to this item, other than that I did not want to ignore the one and only time that «eminence» will be associated with my name.

Apparently Rush and the rest of the cons only want to invoke religion and Christianity when they can bend it to meet their talking points.

Again, I am only trying to point out that this a much more complicated than most people want to make it, and since none of us are God, we don't really know.

I only want to make some remarks on the subject of apparitions and visions in general from the point of view of the

in FACT... it does NOT say GOD created it... He only created the bohemeth... you need to rread it more carefully... GOD can use Whatever picture he wants to use to get his point acorss... try again

My point is that when a homosexual couple wants an offspring they will try only one way that is copulation the way God planed if not from their own loins then from a third party, Adoption, IVF, this is how they choose.

Just narrow it down even further with a bunch of 9's after the decimal point until you arrive at what you really want to say, that only you worship the one true deity.

In America many Christians who insist on a literal interpretation of anything in the Bible are often ready to say «but, in this case, Jesus didn't really mean...» when both Jesus and the author of this Gospel labor to convey «You aren't supposed to try to take the live of other things on Earth... that's the whole point, I want you to take on life that only I can offer!»

Only if you want to start at the point where humans were created in order to rub the sticks or gaze at the moon.

As far as attending the marriage ceremony of gay people i have two points of view the first is that that is there choice to live how they want to but to me that is clearly not Gods best and sin is sin and needs to be repented of but that is my standard not theres.As far as divorced people remarrying why shouldnt they if they have repented of there past God forgives them not condemns them.As he said to the women caught in adultery do they condemn you and she answers no and he says and neither do i.Go and sin no more.This was not just for the women causght in adultery this lesson was for every one of us he was addressing our sin publically for all have sinned and fall short of the Glory of God that being his son Jesus Christ he is telling us that we must make the same decision to go and sin no more to repent in our hearts and the only way to do that is to give our hearts and lives totally to Jesus Christ other wise we are no better than the hypocrites in JESUS day.brentnz

ElmerGantry — the only points you make that are accurate are 3 and 4, you might want to do a little research on everything else, sorry but no one not even Mormons believe your points.

Bailey does go on to point out that he believes Paul wanted the church to kick this man out of their fellowship, which would be pretty shocking back then, since there was only one church in a community.

I gave him the benefit of the doubt early on, even though every single person I have encountered, who is of the Reformed persuasion, has proven to be extremely capable of pointing out to everyone else where everyone else is wrong, and can do it in such a way as to give you the impression that, not only do they want to correct your erroneous beliefs, but also want to make sure you feel very, very bad about being completely wrong.

There are several other points I could cover, but I want to highlight only one more.

We shall return to Jeremias's work on the parables again and again, for it is epoch - making in several respects, but for the moment we want only to call attention to the consequences of this work so far as a general view of the nature of the synoptic tradition is concerned the success of Jeremias's work demands that we accept his starting - point, namely, that any parable as it now stands in the gospels represents the teaching of the early Church and the way back from the early Church to the historical Jesus is a long and arduous one.

If the Church does not point the finger squarely at itself, but instead wants to lay the blame on the se - xual revolution, not only is it dishonest, it's also ridiculous.

The only one who can not is Lucifer because he do not want to, God heart is not made of iron, if there are evil people alive in this world it is only because God want them to repent to, there are most evil people who as a children or teenager was sweet but because of another being became evil, Only God know what it did make them change or their pain but only one things is sure as God he did have the first seat to see all their pain and live, and to my point of view as a Father it is by no means lesser than the pain he did feel for them or them victimes, like a electric chonly one who can not is Lucifer because he do not want to, God heart is not made of iron, if there are evil people alive in this world it is only because God want them to repent to, there are most evil people who as a children or teenager was sweet but because of another being became evil, Only God know what it did make them change or their pain but only one things is sure as God he did have the first seat to see all their pain and live, and to my point of view as a Father it is by no means lesser than the pain he did feel for them or them victimes, like a electric chonly because God want them to repent to, there are most evil people who as a children or teenager was sweet but because of another being became evil, Only God know what it did make them change or their pain but only one things is sure as God he did have the first seat to see all their pain and live, and to my point of view as a Father it is by no means lesser than the pain he did feel for them or them victimes, like a electric chOnly God know what it did make them change or their pain but only one things is sure as God he did have the first seat to see all their pain and live, and to my point of view as a Father it is by no means lesser than the pain he did feel for them or them victimes, like a electric chonly one things is sure as God he did have the first seat to see all their pain and live, and to my point of view as a Father it is by no means lesser than the pain he did feel for them or them victimes, like a electric chair.

I'm just pointing out the fact that the people who carried out the crusades delcared themselves Christians, and now people want to try to deflect that fact and say the only people who carried out the crusades were in fact NOT Christians because no Christian would do something like that.

Religion is the ONLY ignition point for all past, present, and future wars and causes inability to accept others as human beings... Anyways why would a god want any of us in heaven?

The question remains, D'Arcy points out, «whether a human being imitates God by seeking itself and its own perfection or by going outside itself to want only God».35 There is a mystery here in the self - realizing love called Eros and the self - giving love called Agape.

When you present the gospel, though the central promise of eternal life is the main point you want to share, it is not the only thing you probably need to share.

But love wants to be bound, which once more highlights one of the central points of this encyclical: The «duties» of sexual continence only make sense in the context of love.

if god really wanted to get his point across why reveal himself / herself to only one segment of the population.