Not exact matches
In one
point only is it correct, that in fact the community separated more and more from orthodox Judaism, that the
disputes between Jesus and his opponents were now recounted and written down as models, and were naturally told in such a way as to correspond to the interests
of the church.
You have mentioned Pogba, Messi et al when making your
point but lets conveniently overlook the fact these type
of players are a one off, and let us also forget about the hundred
of EPL youngsters hyped to high heavens in recent years off the back
of a few spectacular performances
only for them to flounder and disappear under rye scrutiny and pressure
of expectation, the latest been the kid from Aston Villa who was meant to set the league alight this season but who has now totally flopped... nobody is
disputing Iwobi's quality, but he still needs nurturing and care, AFC is a team who is expected to win things and the pressure can break a player, am dead sure you were drooling at the mouth about Ox few years back as you would have done with Walcott too, but 4 years and 10 years after we are still awaiting them to fulfill their potentials....
But the Bank
disputes this,
pointing out that quantitative easing operates through a variety
of channels,
only some
of which actively involve commercial banks.
In the 18 years between the murders and the Three's release from prison, the accused — Damien Echols, Jason Baldwin, and Jessie Misskelley — grew more reflective, their most dogged persecutors changed their theories, and the fame
of the case
only grew, to the
point where even the filmmakers began to
dispute who had access to whom.
The Hachette / Amazon
dispute is an excellent case in
point: Hachette foolishly insisted that Amazon include Kindle DRM on its ebooks, and now all
of Hachette's Kindle customers can
only read them in the Kindle app, making it a harder sell for them to start buying Hachette ebooks from a different seller instead.
(At Shelf Awareness, they
point out as a means
of comparison that while 39 % were aware
of the Amazon / Hachette
dispute, fewer knew about several
of the authors involved in the
dispute: 35 % are aware
of Lee Child, for example, while
only 28 % know who Malcolm Gladwell is.)
Rather, the 10 - Q simply sets out the estimated maximum gross exposure without its connection to the Agreement, and
only separately
points out that the Agreement requires each party to reimburse the other in the event
of a tax benefit arising from a tax
dispute.
5) Shooting the messenger — This was some commentary regarding the ongoing debate between the Center for Consumer Freedom and the Humane Society
of the United States and the reality that when CCF attacks HSUS, HSUS NEVER
disputes their claims,
only points out what CCF stands for.
Feel free to
dispute any
of Booker's arguments, but
only if you are capable
of pointing out the fallacies in his reasoning or the falsity
of his evidence.
IOW we have no empirical measurement
of the magnitude
of GHG radiative forcing This
point is the
ONLY one you have raised that even comes close to providing empirical evidence that CO2 is a GHG (which I am not
disputing), BUT this provides NO empirical evidence to support IPCC's CAGW premise.
Persuasion to the Real Climate
point of view is possible
only if those who write there, and here, remember that people are suspicious when reasonable questions about
disputed science are met by an extraordinary exhibition
of affronted pique and wounded amour - propre such as the one above.
The basis
of ground (b) was that the majority
of the Defendants» sales occurred in China, whereas
only a small proportion occurred in the United Kingdom and thus the centre
of the
dispute from the
point of view
of commercial significance was based in China.
The Judge concluded the case by
pointing out that the
dispute demonstrated the range
of possible outcomes when parties are calculating Close - Out Amounts, and the wisdom
of ISDA making the changes that it did in the 2002 Agreement — NPC illustrated the type
of outcome that a party given the role
of decision maker and limited
only by a requirement
of rationality might press for, regardless
of the fact
of an actual replacement transaction.
The legal market is fairly stable, Stetsenko reports, and he
points to AstapovLawyers» transformation into Eterna Law and the recent defection from CMS to DLA
of dispute resolution Partner Olga Vorozhbyt as the
only recent developments
of note.
The Court
pointed out that there is a «very strong legislative direction» under our arbitration statutes and numerous cases holding that the Court should
only refuse to refer a matter to arbitration if it is clear that the
dispute falls outside
of the arbitration clause.
The guidelines insist at several
points that some form
of mechanism for enforcement and
dispute settlement will be required not
only for the withdrawal agreement, but also for any transitional arrangement and agreement governing future UK - EU relations.
The Court
pointed out that there is a «very strong legislative direction» under the arbitration statutes and numerous cases holding that the Court should
only refuse to refer a matter to arbitration if it is clear that the
dispute falls outside
of the arbitration clause.
Mobile legal research throws the suddenly unprepared lawyer a lifeline by presenting a way to quickly find information that helps answer a question, support or
dispute a
point, or engage in a new line
of questioning — all
of which not
only helps in those important moments, but also builds the trust and credibility that can lead to new and enduring business.
Again, the legal profession from City firms to sole practitioners mounted a staunch opposition,
pointing out that it would not
only restrict access to justice for individuals and smaller businesses, but damage the reputation
of London as an international centre for legal
dispute resolution.
A large number
of B2C
disputes involve
only a small number
of scenarios: goods not delivered, goods not paid for, goods broken or otherwise unsuitable...
points on which most legal systems will produce very similar results.
As a
point of interest, the recent BC Court
of Appeal case
of Innes v. Bui is worth reviewing for the Court's comments on appropriate parties to sue when the
only dispute following a collision is ICBC's determination
of fault and the premium consequences that flow from this.
It is perhaps curious that the
only reported case on this is the old one
of Cresswell v Board
of Inland Revenue [1984] 2 All ER 713, [1984] IRLR 190, but the facts
of that case make the
point well — the civil servants in
dispute were obliged to accept reasonable adaptations to change from quill pen clerks to computerised clerks, in order to keep up with new technology.