You are obviously incorrect when you state: «The fact that a thermodynamically stable adiabatic lapse rate is inconsistent with physics, violating the second law, is
the only point of my article.
The fact that a thermodynamically stable adiabatic lapse rate is inconsistent with physics, violating the second law, is
the only point of my article.
Not exact matches
Is it so wrong
of me to have faith that
only one person believes in the drivel that he's posting rather than think that another person a) actually thinks that chad is making good
points and good enough
points to post and b) go to the 62nd page
of an almost defunct
article for a conversation that has nothing to do with themselves other than to cheer on a stupid post?
I don't understand why atheists follow
articles about faith,
only to seek to offend people who may agree with one or more
points of the
article.
So in reference to the orginal
article and my first
point, I would
only echo Pascal's Wager: if I live life accepting
of God and «love my neighbor,» but it turns out to be wrong because there is no God, I have no regrets; if I live life unaccepting
of God and He does exist, well I guess Ghandi and I will be sharing a room...
Thanks Jeremy, However, I must disagree with at least one
of your statements (simply because I did not read the entire
article,
only the main
points).
The
article points out (which is true) that members
of the church are allowed
ONLY to do the work for their own ancestors.
The main
point of his
article was that the ICEL translation (
of the Ordinary
of the Mass) was not
only banal, nor even simply erroneous; Monckton demonstrated that it was marred by systematic omissions, and systematic doctrinal defects.
I am not saying disappointment on your
article, my
only point is that its faith, and
only God can judge the correctness... The word
of God cultivates the mind, and the seed
of faith should bloom in its natural way, urging anything to study by words and its meaning is in - vain because the use
of that will not gain you anything from God, but yes maybe in politics and people like you.
In other words, those references and developments must
point to and manifest
only one concept
of God, the concept
of God that, given its chronological relationship with the concept
of God as primordial and consequent natures, has been termed the «early concept
of God
of Process and Reality» in the first sections
of this
article.
News Flash: You missed the
point of the
article by reading
only the line that made he hit her head off the podium.
The Writers criticism
of supporters waving WENGER OUT BANNERS is wrong.Supporters have every right to show their contempt
of this man who has now made himself the
point of ridicule and a laughing stock within the football world.Im talking opposition supporters, tv and press as well as the ever increasing majority
of the Arsenal Fanbase.Who ever wrote this
article has misjudged the mood
of the support and is badly mistaken if he feels his comments will carry any credibility.How many WENGER IN banners are held up each match?The
only chants for Wenger to stay are from our opponents fans.
Of course they want him to stay.Why wouldn't they?
after yesterday, s win against palace which was a good 3
points, i, d love justarsenal to write an
article on the quality
of the pitches!not
only our game suffered because
of it but we were lucky no one got injured some would be forgiven to think this was an intended ploy by palace to win the game!!
Look gentlemen this WAS an extremely well written and well researched
article and has to rank as one
of the best Ive read in many a long year, Howvever when all
of the «in depth analysis» has been done it really boils down to two
points and two
points only, 1) Our strikers (namely Walcott, Giroud, Welbeck and Cambel) just did nt score enough goals when it really mattered, 2) our defence made too many mistakes that allowed too many goals to be scored against us when it mattered.
And whilst you are entirely on
point when you say DB represents
only potential and is nowhere near the finished
article I can promise you if he scores a deciding goal for us tomorrow then the debate will snowball, and if he starts knocking a few in for us in the coming months there will be a shed load
of revisionist theories being flung around.
can u ever write an
article without mocking arsene or wishing his reign to come to an end it is ok sometimes but every time come on man give it a break on to our defence there are
only 2 games in this season where team's overall defensive performance can be taken to doubt first was pool because
of both first team defenders out second is olympiakos where u can
point to team not defending so well on corner that also was actually an individual mistake by ospina which changed the game so our defence is doing good job give credit where it is due
of course it would be interesting to see whether we can contain the most inform team in Europe.
The Gunners earned
only their second away win
of the campaign this weekend when beating Burnley, and those three
points saw them leapfrog both Liverpool and Tottenham into the top four,... Read the full
article here
I think I've been reading other version's
of this
article on this site before — the
point is that year in year out we have pretty much the same discussions while the
only constant in all
of this is Wenger.
Even though they've started this season in a very bad way, collecting
only one
point more than Sunderland, the Hammers are the
only one,
of all the teams featured in this
article, that didn't sack their manager.
This Rosin
article, as you
pointed out, is just another attempt to garner cheap publicity, at the expense
of the general American populace, who
only believe what they read in magazines.
Interviewed for the
article, Edward Olshansky, owner
of The Green Cradle,
points out that 5 Phases «is the
only one in the market where you can actually put breast milk in a glass bottle and freeze it.»
And I'm not the
only one, my close circle
of friends and family has had situations as well, but that's not the
point of this
article.
Let's also take a look at the very first and last lines
of Jon's
article, the first coming after an extended quote from part
of my
article pointing out what I see as a limitation
of Twitter — that you can
only stuff so much complex thought into 140 characters:
As former Shadow Secretary
of State for Education Tristram Hunt
pointed out in a recent
article in New Statesman, perhaps this does not
only apply to the centre in conventional left versus right terms, but also in terms
of «open» versus «closed».
«The fact the effects observed were limited to
only women with children younger than 13 years suggests that parity was not sufficient to produce changes in flashes and
points instead to the increased nurturance needs
of young children,» the authors wrote in the journal
article.
Also, to reiterate one
of the
points made in the
article, a vaccination campaign using
only a malaria - transmission blocking vaccine (TBV) would indeed confer direct benefit to the immunized individual.
Interestingly, while doom and gloom language was present in 10 percent
of all
articles in this study,
only 4 percent contained
only this type
of language (e.g., «At this
point, without human intervention, the species could go extinct within our lifetimes,» Los Angeles Times, July 4, 2012); the remaining
articles expressed both doom and gloom and optimistic language.
But I was fascinated by everything he told me, and as I wrote in that
article, we were interrupted at one
point by [a] phone call from Ray Smullyan, the logician and magician and musician — although I didn't know about the latter two, I
only knew
of him as a logician at the time and a very, very influential logician on myself; he had written a book that had a great impact on me.
With grants and careers on the line, Ferric C. Fang
of the University
of Washington, Seattle, who has studied scientific misconduct, says in the Post
article that ambitious people may «have this tempting thought: If
only the data
points would line up....»
Probably the most contradictory
point in the whole
article — on one hand we have that «most brands
only contain about 2 % almonds» so you can't really benefit from the vitamin E, B2, magnesium and copper, however on the other hand it says really «we would
only eat a small handful
of almonds in one sitting and having two lattes on almond milk will add up to more than that».
Mr. Cole responded to Mr. Broad's
article by
pointing out that, in fact, it was B.K.S. Iyengar who had instituted the use
of blankets under the shoulders to prevent injury and enhance the positive effects
of shoulder stand, and Mr. McCall has since stated that he was speaking
only of his own experience with headstand and had not intended it as a proscription against the pose at all.
Not
only that, as numerous
articles in the conference magazine and Fred Smith's keynote
pointed out, maitri is an important element in the practice
of classical yoga.
As the author
of the
article points out, there are some industry - wide seismic shifts happening, and J. Crew will probably not be the
only victim.
The whole
point of this
article is to help you figure out that the
only person you need permission from to live your life fully is YOU!
Just like last week when I did my Fire Emblem Warriors preview
article, the time has come once again for me to publically speak out on Fire Emblem Warriors,
only this time around, I'm allowed to disclose almost everything I could possibly want to mention,
only instead
of doing this Switch version focused review like another other review I have written, because
of Fire Emblem Warrior's subject matter, I'm also going to take the time to
point out the similarities between the Fire Emblem the Warriors game and Fire Emblem the series.
Chris Terrio's screenplay, which draws from a portion
of Antonio J. Mendez's «The Master
of Disguise» as well as a Wired magazine
article, is loaded with witticisms until the final act, at which
point Mendez heads to Iran and presents the six hidden Americans (among them,
only a wily Scott McNairy stands out) with their task.
Thivisol's best actress prize at Venice occasioned a series
of articles in Variety and elsewhere about whether or not what she did was acting (one
of the jurors at Venice, Anjelica Huston,
pointed out to me in an interview that there were
only four female lead performances, including Thivisol's, among the 20 or so competition films).
Lisa's second
article elaborates on the beneficiality
of emotional learning by
pointing to studies that show how the practice
of kindness not
only produces joy but also reduces bullying in schools.
Or should I also
point out that the author
of this
article and self - appointed editor in chief
of this site is also the owner
of the website and the company behind it and that it's most likely the
only reason why he is allowed to write
articles on it?
The full
article is
only available to subscribers, but I thought there were some very interesting
points made in the
article that support many
of the things I have been saying for years.
He further backed up that
point in an
article today in which he explains that the same ODM who produced the Playbook created a lot
of the design for the Fire, which will
only help Amazon speed up the production in time to get the device to market in time for holiday shopping.
And that is the
point that I hopefully made in the
article, that there are authors who not
only rant but who enlist their legions
of readers to counterattack a negative review.
It's
only because I'm seeing this error for the second time in one
of your
articles that I
point it out (first time could have been a typo).
Thank you for standing up for our dying grammar conventions, but I would have to argue that helpful advice like this — which is
only meant to make the
article better and to maintain the integrity
of the piece and
of the site as a whole — might be better shared in a private email, rather than
pointing it out in the comments» section.
I worry that if we, as a society, don't figure out how to make this happen, the diversity
of points of view we find in the books and
articles we read will slowly shrink, until we're left with a situation where we
only have the
points of view
of people wealthy enough not to need the money and people so over the top invested in sharing their ideas that they don't care about money at all.
An author with the branding and readership that Jodi Picoult has can probably come away from a situation like these negotiations with her sales intact, as evidenced by her # 1 NYT spot for her latest print release, but as Gross
pointed out in the
article, debut and newer authors stand to lose a lot in sales and fan growth, which will
only perpetuate the cycle
of bookstore and publisher demise.
Wait, even though the
article pointed out the return numbers are skewed since they
only compared return rates at Verizon stores — it just blows your comment out
of the water.
4 - That the Big Publishing Houses in Manhattan glass towets don't participate in KU says nothing about whether KU is a good deal for Indies because, as the table listed in the
article points out, KU payouts
only approximate the typical author payouts
of Indie - priced books.
This includes correctly identifying the extreme dividend growth and capital appreciation awaiting Visa shareholders in general during its rise from $ 50 to $ 130 per share over the past four years, Schwab investors during Brexit when the stock was at $ 25 before rising to $ 60, or
pointing out the inanity
of paying $ 71 per share for classic blue - chip staple General Mills in the summer
of 2016 (triggering my
only ever «short»
article for a blue - chip stock in my history
of writing).
I disagree with
point 2 from the WSJ
article because a stronger global economy not
only means that profits will rise, but also the cost
of capital.