Sentences with phrase «only possible point»

Their only possible point in intersection is, weirdly, Twitter.

Not exact matches

Most quickly pointed out that Apple has provided developers with a tool it calls «On - Demand Resources» making it possible for apps to download content, such as new levels in games, only when needed.

Even the 4 % annual total return of the S&P 500 in the 15 years since the 2000 peak has been made possible only by driving current valuations to the second most extreme point in U.S. history.

«AHS has reached a critical point where the only viable option for sustaining linen services that are core to patient care is to work with our existing linen contract provider and transition AHS facilities to them as effectively as possible,» says a briefing note from June last year.

I think the only defense against such an unprincipled politician who will say or do anything to get power, is to point out as loudly and publicly as possible the many untruths and contradictions he is trying to pull over on the Alberta public.

And yet agreement is only possible IF your have clarified whatever point you are trying to make.

And as a believer I resent canned speeches throwing around fundamental talking points as if it is the only possible truth.

I would like to point out to those here who think it is not possible for Jesuits (or anyone) to hold science and faith simultaneously, and who invoke «evidence» as the only arbiter of what is real, that human knowledge is always evolving.

In other words, it may be true that «the owl of Minerva flies only at night,» but Kierkegaard suspects that the metaphor hides a profoundly dubious claim: that it is possible to reach a stable end - point of reflection from which Minerva's owl can take off, and to which it can later return.

It seemed to be an obvious and necessary truth that through a point not belonging to a straight line it is possible to draw one and only one line parallel to the given line.

Your underlying premise is that the current state of the universe is the only possible one and hence a plan or design was needed to get it to this point.

Yes I have done everything possible and accessed every possible avenue for help with county caseworker etc... Only God can help at this point.

Berger believes that the only possible starting point for theology today is the anthropological.

It claims that faith only became possible at a definite point in history in consequence of an event — viz., the event of Christ.

Firstly, it must be remembered, that he disclaims very early in the book that he can only speak for the mainline denominations with which he is familiar, and although my memory may fail me, he implies that he can only speak for his observations of the churches / leaders with whom he is familiar, and also that he may be wrong, and also, that he is only pointing out what he calls a possible cause for the problems he has seen, and hopes that his suggestions / ideas, will be considered, researched, etc, and that time will tell if his thesis bears any truth or not.

In many respects it was only possible to speak with full theological accuracy about the Constantinian turning - point, the feudal State of the Middle Ages and innumerable other events in the life of the Church, when these events already belonged to the past.

That distinction is a half - truth at best, and it misses two important points: the widespread reading of such books not only tells us something important about the overall religious temper of our times; it may also give us a clue to one possible theological expression of the future.

Until now the state of the sciences did not provide sufficient grounds for it; only the scientific progress of the last decades of the twentieth century has made it possible to reach this vantage point.

What is more, as Buber has pointed out, the resumption of true dialogue between peoples will only be possible when the existential mistrust which divides the world into two hostile camps is overcome.

Sometimes the inventiveness of a human imagination suffices to procure possibility, but in the last resort, that is, when the point is to believe, the only help is this, that for God all things are possible.

Cobb at one point tells us that God's ultimate creative goal is to «introduce the possibility of a creative synthesis of the new with the old,» and Ogden tells us that «God's only aim or intention in exercising his power is the fullest possible self - creation of all his creatures» (PTT 107, FF 89).

So as a starting point, only the latter six could possibly be nominees as possible sources of our governing laws.

For Revelation in the ultimate resort and in principle claims the whole of reality as the possible subject - matter of its affirmations, even if only sub respectu salutis (in relation to salvation), and from this point of view even events and realities which are accessible to secular experience fall within its material scope.

It is apparent from the very point of origin of human cognition (though it has only been possible to indicate this briefly), that spirit is a reality that can only be understood by direct acquaintance, having its own proper identity derived from no other.

Resurrection is an idiom which acknowledges the fact of death but does not allow death to have the last word, for it is pointing to the way in which, even in the natural world, death is being followed again and again by a fresh manifestation of life, which has been possible only because of the phenomenon of death.

I will only recall that, by virtue of its convergent nature, hominization is scarcely conceivable (seen from the point at which we find ourselves) except as terminating, whatever road it follows, in a point of collective reflection where Mankind, having achieved within and around itself, technically and intellectually, the greatest possible coherence, will find itself raised to a higher critical point — one of instability, tension, inter-penetration and metamorphosis — coinciding, it would seem, with what for us are the phenomenal limits of the world.

Just as it would be impossible to replace with definitions such words as» home,» or «light,» or «music,» or to make the meaning of such words clear to someone who had never himself experienced the realities to which they point, so it will always be impossible to replace with definitions such terms as «the grace of God in Christ,» «peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ,» or the great story in which these phrases have their only possible context.

As we now turn to practical Modernism, which is best represented in American Protestantism, it must be pointed out first of all that it is possible to make only a theoretical distinction between these two types of Modernism.

The crucial point is that it is only an act or movement of negation and transcendence that makes possible the advent of the new.

Indeed, it was only at this point in history, so the early Christians believed, that it had become possible to discern the true significance of the purposes and promises of the God of Israel.

Moreover, as John Paul II pointed out again and again, responsible human freedom is not possible outside a more basic loyalty to the commands that can come to us only in and through culture.

Not one written in it's own language using only concepts and events which could have been seen as possible from the point of view of other fotune tellers in it's culture, and of it's own day.

Zarathustra, and every authentic modern visionary, points the way to a total affirmation of the world, an affirmation which becomes possible only when the world appears as chaos, and man is liberated from every transcendent root and ground.

For people with this point of view the idea of finding more than one religion valid, even in a deeply personal sense, is not only possible but normal.

This would be possible only on the assumption of the reality of such a metaphysical entity, and on this point Buddhist skepticism has much justification.

The point is, the definition which is given of a scientific object at any given point in history is not inviolable, so that the only change possible would be to add something («organizing relations») to it; what happens is that the definition itself is changed.

As utterly improbable as it is, our only answer at this point is to say it's possible that all of those things just popped out of nothing via random combination of molecules»

Simply foolish pride and arrogance to think we can... again, if one point is proven not possible than the only other alternative has to be correct, one which can not be proven to not be true.

(Schumann p. 186) But is there any point in analyzing human Being in relation to God if the relation between man and God is possible only as an event in the concrete encounter between man and God?

Because of this incompleteness God's subjective immediacy does not end, despite God's always having a specific satisfaction, and that is why there is, only in God's case, no perishing, With respect to all these points my argumentation rests on the reversal of poles in God (by which an aim is possible for God which is formally independent of any concrete actual world, while Christian does not use God's reversed polar structure but uses God's everlastingness as his main argument.

Where so many solutions are possible, and so much hangs on the evidence of a single verse, it is not easy to choose; but two considerations point to the verse being the work of the author himself and having a special reference to the story of the last chapter, or to a part only of the gospel.

Using the notion of generality, Whitehead wants to point out that mathematics always seeks expressions which, taking up the notions of the variable and of form, are able to unite as great a subdivision of mathematics as possible, using only one uniform formalism.

As for the Eye — Creationists only ever refer to the rhetorical portion of Darwin's statement in which he said «to suppose that the eye... could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest possible degree» — but they never point out that he then went on to describe the evolutionary path of the eye — a theory which over a hundred years of careful research has confirmed.

Of all the possible names here we will mention only that of our own teacher, the moderately conservative Joachim Jeremias, who deserves to be heard on this point, if only because he has done more than any other single scholar to add to our knowledge of the historical Jesus.

Similar to Ballast Point's brewing philosophy, the kitchen will only source the best possible ingredients, including steroid and antibiotic - free proteins, line - caught fish and local produce when available.

We wanted to have as many points as possible from the first two opening games but we only have one point.

If we're going to take 3 points from it, we've only got 2 possible lineups.

David Moyes's side have lost only one of their previous 17 home league games, taking 36 points from a possible 51 in the process (W10, D6, L1).

They have picked up three points from a possible 21 away from home this season but have lost only one of their last six at home.

He had only been manager of the club six months and had only managed to gain seventeen out of a possible forty - two points, but it was Boca's 1 - 0 defeat to River Plate recently which was the final nail in the coffin.