Sentences with phrase «only problem with this analysis»

Not exact matches

My problem with this type of analysis is that it only considers one side of the equation — your income level.

An analysis of Pew's data suggests that only half of Francis's fans among white evangelicals agree with him that global warming is occuring and is a serious problem, and only one - third agree that it is caused by humans.

Also, if you haven't already downloaded my water birth meta - analysis go do that now; the publisher is providing it free for a limited time.3 Not only will it give you evidence for outcomes, but it explains some of the common problems with water birth research and whether or not they negate the findings.

I would argue though, that it is only with proper methodology and rigorous analysis that practical solutions to seemingly intractable social problems will be uncovered.

Analysis of this tower of baby babble has only just begun, but Roy has already come to appreciate some of what it would take to extend the project to other volunteers — to, say, help families of kids with communications problems.

Contamination — one of the biggest concerns with ancient DNA analyses — is also less likely to be a problem with osteocalcin, because it is found only in vertebrate bones.

This test analyses only the part of the DNA that is actually relevant and it is an over-the-counter product, so it does not cause the data privacy problems that go along with a DNA laboratory test.

With extensive analysis, this collection not only provides readers with a clearer understanding of the problems surrounding educational inequality, but also offers guidance to policymakers in addressing these problWith extensive analysis, this collection not only provides readers with a clearer understanding of the problems surrounding educational inequality, but also offers guidance to policymakers in addressing these problwith a clearer understanding of the problems surrounding educational inequality, but also offers guidance to policymakers in addressing these problems.

Improving teaching and learning with the use of data is only as effective as are the insights gained with data analysis and the consequent actions taken regarding the problem and how it might be solved.

In terms of what his analysis offers to the industry — «I'm trying to solve the [same] problem the Big Five is trying to solve,» he said from the stage — Data Guy focused, in part, on an interpretation of debut - author unit sales, with 22 percent of them in 2014 coming from Big Five publishers, 11 percent in 2015 coming from Big Fives, and only 9 percent coming from Big Fives in the first quarterly report of 2016.

+1 — Great answer, The only problem with this type of analysis is that it mostly ignores risk of all types (specifically investment return risk and length of lifetime risk).

Surely, if you've actually read what we've written on this, you are aware that there are no errors at all in the analysis presented in Steig et al, the problems are only with some restricted AWS stations which were used in a 2ndary consistency check, and not the central analysis upon which the conclusions are based (which uses AVHRR data, not AWS data).

Quality Assurance Specialist — The Georgetown Group, Georgetown, Texas — October 2010 - August 2013 • Tracked and recorded volume of sales for 37 employees in real time • Promoted to trainer after only two years • Analyzed trends and generated bi-weekly reports for company leadership with recommendations for improvement • Identified strengths and weaknesses in employee communication and problem - resolution and reported violations to company policy when necessary • Developed and implemented new performance measurement system to streamline analysis process and promote a superior customer service experience • Recognized areas of possible risk and designed innovative solutions to ensure adherence to legal and professional standards

Contrary to the meta - analyses of Crits - Christoph5 andAnderson and Lambert, 7 studies of IPT werenot included (eg, Elkin et al30 and Wilfleyet al31), because the relation of IPT to STPPis controversial, and empirical results suggest that IPT is very close toCBT.9 Thus, this review includes only studiesfor which there is a general agreement that they represent models of STPP.As it is questionable to aggregate the results of very different outcome measuresthat refer to different areas of psychological functioning, we assessed theefficacy of STPP separately for target symptoms, general psychiatric symptoms (ie, comorbid symptoms), and social functioning.32 Thisprocedure is analogous to the meta - analysis of Crits - Christoph.5 Asoutcome measures of target problems, we included patient ratings of targetproblems and measures referring to the symptoms that are specific to the patientgroup under study, eg, measures of anxiety for studies investigating treatmentsof anxiety disorders.33 For the efficacy ofSTPP in general psychiatric symptoms, broad measures of psychiatric symptomssuch as the Symptom Checklist - 90 and specific measures that do not refer specificallyto the disorder under study were included; eg, the Beck Depression Inventoryapplied in patients with personality disorders.34, 35 Forthe assessment of social functioning, the Social Adjustment Scale and similarmeasures were included.36

In multivariate analyses that included Brief Infant - Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment status and parental worry, Brief Infant - Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment scores significantly predicted all school - age problems, whereas worry predicted only parent reports with the Child Behavior Checklist.

However, choosing a construct that is too specific harbors the risk of ending up with only a few studies on fathers, as was the problem in the Leaper, Anderson, and Sanders meta - analysis [7].

Therefore, given that only these four parameters were significantly associated with CU traits and ODD problems (teacher rate), we further conducted four separate multiple hierarchical regression analyses, one for each of these parameters, in order to examine the contributions of CU traits, anxiety, ODD - related problems and their interactions on attentional processing of emotional faces as indexed by these parameters.

Although the observed support behaviors were coded into 10 categories, we analyzed the data for only the following categories in the current study: (1) Positive support seeking (e.g., gives clear analysis of the problem, recognizes partner as an aid, agrees with provider's suggestions); (2) Negative support seeking (e.g., rejects help, criticizes the support provider, makes demands for support, complains); (3) Positive emotional support provision (e.g., reassures, encourages expression of feelings, provides genuine encouragement); (4) Positive instrumental support provision (e.g., offers specific plan or assistance, gives helpful advice); (5) Negative support provision (e.g., criticizes, minimizes problem, is inattentive, offers unhelpful advice).

This analysis confirmed five of the six expected relations: (1) CERQ Self - Blame was primarily related to FEEL - KJ Self - Devaluation, r = 0.35, p < 0.001, (2) CERQ Acceptance was only related to FEEL - KJ Acceptance, r = 0.19, p = 0.009, (3) CERQ Rumination was associated primarily with FEEL - KJ Rumination, r = 0.21, p = 0.005, (4) CERQ Positive Refocusing was related mainly to FEEL - KJ Humor Enhancement, r = 0.31, p < 0.001, and (5) CERQ Refocus on Planning was mainly associated with FEEL - KJ Cognitive Problem Solving, r = 0.37, p < 0.001.

Follow - up analyses examining specific subscales of observed dyadic coping (see Table 6) indicated that nondistressed couples with a depressed wife (G2) demonstrated significantly higher values in relative duration (F (3, 58) = 2.80, p ≤ 0.05) and frequency (F (3, 58) = 2.73, p ≤ 0.05) of problem focused stress communication, although this comparison was only significant in comparison to distressed couples with a depressed husband (G3).