Sentences with phrase «only problems seems»

My only problem seems to be that it was a bit grainy, so maybe I didn't let it boil long enough?

Only problem I seemed to have was the bottom not being anywhere near as crunchy as the top.

Not exact matches

It only takes a few minutes to make these calls, and the impression they create seems to be very positive, particularly if the customer had a problem I could help resolve.

«Boeing's challenge is an authentic business decision, yet Ottawa seems untroubled about once again playing Sir Galahad, not only intervening on Bombardier's behalf, but also putting the problem - plagued effort to buy new fighter jets on the line, solely for the benefit of a privileged Quebec family and the people they employ,» Kelly McParland wrote in the National Post.

So far most of the government apps seem modest in scope (think: Mapping crime reports or finding out when the next train will come), but O'Reilly suggested that this is only the beginning and that the approach can work for big problems like rising health care costs, poorly performing schools, and climate change.

The real problem is that between super-angels and micro-VCs, there seems to be lots more Series A dealmaking — about two - thirds more — while the number of Series B deals is up by «only» about 25 percent.

«Only one person can speak at a time and the video and audio always seem to have problems.

The technology industry has a big problem with diversity, one that seems to be getting worse: In 1991 women held 37 % of computing jobs; today they hold only 26 %.

To me it seems like a valuable reason to only get links from related and relevant niches - the problem is just that depending on your niche it's too competitive to simply ask for a link and get it...

So the «accounting software problem» seems to have kicked in only in Q3.

Seems like an obvious contradiction to me; something that's only supposed to work as an apologetic against problems with the prevailing God model while, in fact, it works equally well against all the positive aspects of that same model.

Anyway, trying to communicate this, and the other issues, to my then pastor was also fraught with problems as he seemed too preoccupied with how my leaving was making him feel than with the years of rejection I described which led to me leaving, I say leaving but I only moved to a church up the road (I had been in the first church for over 20 years but couldn't bear it any longer, which was a sad outcome).

It seems to me that the real problem occurs between Phases 4 and 5, where — upon facing the reality of my actual life and my actual responsibilities — I not only abandon Shane Claiborne's way of following Jesus, I abandon following Jesus altogether.

What seem at the moment to be nothing but random interruptions in the conversation could turn out to be the key to dealing with some problem — if we'd only take time to ask (and then listen) to why that came to mind, what stream of thinking points came together to connect the conversation to that point.

I've often been told that the reason I have a problem with the idea of people suffering eternally without the chance to be saved is because my sense of justice has been perverted by my sin nature, that it only seems unfair to me because «God's ways are higher than our ways.»

I need not quote it in full, because only one of Katherine's problems seems worth discussing.

First, Driscoll's so - called «fall» (from the Acts 29 p.o.v.) seems mainly to involve scandalous improprieties re: funds and books and tone and so on, but the theology that undergirds the spiritual abuse doesn't come under fire since Acts 29 not only doesn't see it as a problem, but generally holds to it as well.

It seems that Phelps is trying to take God's place as Judge, the problem however is that only God is God, the Righteous Judge and God sees the whole picture.

The only problem I have ever had with religion, any religion, is that the faithful seem to think that athiests need to prove that god doesn't exist.

There's a lot of seeming contradiction, I grant you, but these are only problems for people who want there to be problems.

But despite the linguistic problems associated with this designation, it seems that the epithet «preacher,» in the sense of «pastor,» is indeed an appropriate one, at least theologically.36 According to Duncan Macdonald, we have done Qoheleth an injustice by viewing his work as reflecting only a spirit of resignation and despair.

But what critics who point to these reasons for the loss of certainty seem too often to forget is that the Church is never only a function of a culture nor ever only a supercultural community; that the problem of its ministers is always how to remain faithful servants of the Church in the midst of cultural change and yet to change culturally so as to be true to the Church's purpose in new situations.

The only intelligible solution to this problem would seem to be to admit the relative religious value, based on experience, of each group's scriptures for its own corporate life, but to recognize that no book has final authority.

The only problem with that view is that it does seem to gloss over sin.

All in all, the problems are such that we have felt it necessary to ignore the Johannine material altogether, even in the case of the Son of man teaching, and the only major reference to be found on the fourth gospel in what follows is one of the account of the crucifixion where it does seem apparent that John is referring to a Christian exegetical tradition.

The only «Jews» that Jesus seemed to have a problem with were the Pharisees and some of the priests.

Only a trinitarian conception of God seems able to meet this problem.

Although Whitehead has successfully avoided the traditional problem of evil by his dipolar doctrine of God, he seems to have presented us with another problem of evil in the sense that God is not only unavoidably implicated in the actions of finite occasions, but to the extent that pleasure is realized by occasions God derives enjoyment in his consequent nature also.

It seems to me that it is only when God is understood as source of order and novelty that God is «justifiable» in terms of the problem of suffering.

Only passive solar energy seems to be completely free of such problems.

The only young man in his late 20s attending our church is causing problems, as he seems to be slowly dating each woman of around his age in the church... More

At first glance, the formulation of the problem from which Whitehead proceeds in MC — he still clings to the presupposition of the cosmological adequacy and precision of the theoretical language of mathematics — must seem to be itself an aporia: Whitehead wants to investigate various ways — in the first instance internal to mathematics (but cf. MC 465, 524)-- of considering the «nature of the material world»; at the same time, however, he wants to understand this world as a unity which, even though conceived as in motion, consists of only one kind of entity (MC 468, 479, 482, 525).

Furthermore, no special problems would seem to be posed by the fact that only one of these four possibilities can be realized even in principle.

The problem is not only is he talking to G - d, but he also seems to be buying into an US uber alles philosophy — THAT»S scary.

Indeed, its advantages might seem considerable: it treats the root of the problem and not only its symptoms, thereby avoiding the risk of passing the disorder on to future generations.

In Whitehead's conceptuality this problem of theodicy seems to be avoided by the fact that it is God's primordial nature only that provides the initial aim.

Only Whitehead, it seems, has attempted an ontological resolution to this problem — the «interplay» of concrescence ends with the concrete superjective «brute fact» of a finite «decision» (in the sense of «cutting off» (PR 43/68)-RRB-.

The only problem that this seems to cause is that you would need to make an awful lot of them so that they lasted more than an hour or so!!!!:)

Also I should add that I only made half the quantity the recipe asks for - but I have done that with other recipes from your book and that didn't seem to be a problem before.

It seems the only birds that run into our windows are the hummingbirds — all of the others zip around with no problem.

Only one problem: in Berlin it seems impossible to find any Mexican / American dried chiles.

I decided to only chill them overnight to avoid any problems but 2 days seems possible as long as they are well sealed.

I used Bragg's raw unfiltered apple cider vinegar... but those don't seem like they would cause a problem!?? The only thing I can figure is after putting dough in pan I wet my finger to smoothe top since batter was so thick & uneven in pan.

The only thing that is starting to become a problem at our house is the kids seem to have taken over pizza night.

I used it for a lovely soup (which recommended lentils du Puy), the only problem was that the dark color of the lentil seemed to bleed off in the broth, making the whole soup a mucky dark grey... it didn't affect the flavor but I have to say didn't look that good.

My only problem has been that each time the outter part of the crust cooks perfectly, but the center always seems to be undercooked.

I left it in the oven and it seemed to fix the problem (I've only tried the firmer of my two pies so far).

I only ran into one small problem, though — mine did not cluster like yours seemed to have clustered.

The only problem I had with them is, after freezing, I wanted to cut them into small bars and put them into ziplock baggies and they seemed to crumble rather than hold in bar.

My only problem is that the little kernels seem to fly all over my kitchen!