Not exact matches
The UFT / NYSUT lawsuit, which asks the court to overturn the
Charter School Committee's action, said the new rules would not only «significantly undercut the quality of teaching in SUNY - approved charter schools,» but also would create «an essentially fake certification process, one not valid for employment in New York's public school districts, other charter schools or the public schools of other states.
Charter School Committee's action, said the new rules would not only «significantly undercut the quality of teaching in SUNY - approved charter schools,» but also would create «an essentially fake certification process, one not valid for employment in New York's public school districts, other charter schools or the public schools of other states.&
School Committee's action, said the new rules would not
only «significantly undercut the
quality of teaching in SUNY - approved
charter schools,» but also would create «an essentially fake certification process, one not valid for employment in New York's public school districts, other charter schools or the public schools of other states.
charter schools,» but also would create «an essentially fake certification process, one not valid for employment in New York's public
school districts, other charter schools or the public schools of other states.&
school districts, other
charter schools or the public schools of other states.
charter schools or the public
schools of other states.»
Some organizations direct their activities
only to district and / or
charter school issues, such as improving teacher
quality and effectiveness, developing new public
charter schools, or closing and transforming failing district
schools to create new high -
quality schools of choice.
The statement includes a list of these developments: the US Supreme Court ruled scholarships constitutional; numerous studies showed these programs benefit needy kids; families empowered with this choice express great satisfaction; urban districts continue to struggle despite great effort;
chartering hasn't created enough high -
quality seats; and smart accountability systems can ensure
only high -
quality private
schools participate in these programs.
We see
only slight changes in people's views on the
quality of the nation's
schools, for instance, or on federally mandated testing,
charter schools, tax credits to support private
school choice, merit pay for teachers, or the effects of teachers unions.
Likewise, the 2015 CREDO report concluded that Detroit's
charter sector was one of
only four urban
charter communities that «provide essential examples of
school - level and system - level commitments to
quality that can serve as models to other communities.»
That's not
only bad for students; it also threatens
charter schools» ability to reach the next level of scale and
quality they'll need to survive over the long run.
they point out that in some states, authorizers operate virtually unchecked, with dire consequences for students, and that the National Alliance for Public
Charter Schools approves the
quality controls of
only two states (Hawaii and Louisiana) and the District of Columbia.
The causes of today's political malaise are too complex to be laid
only on the
schools, whether
charter - or district - run, though there is reason to question the
quality of civics and history teaching.
As the
charter authorizer, our job is to keep our strong focus on
quality — closing low - performing
schools, helping promising
schools improve, encouraging our best
schools to expand, and applying rigorous oversight to approve
only the most - promising new applicants.
And then there are
charter schools that are a welcome breath of fresh air to parents who, perhaps like me not too long ago, can
only afford to live in neighborhoods where the traditional
schools in that community are not of the highest
quality, but desire a high level of education, nonetheless, for their child (ren).
Based on model legislation developed out of best practices from around the country, Mississippi has a rigorous and accountable process to ensure that
only the highest
quality charter schools will be authorized.
From centrist Democrats who think that choice should
only be limited to the expansion of public
charter schools (and their senseless opposition to
school vouchers, which, provide money to parochial and private
schools, which, like
charters, are privately - operated), to the libertarian Cato Institute's pursuit of ideological purity through its bashing of
charters and vouchers in favor of the voucher - like tax credit plans (which explains the irrelevance of the think tank's education team on education matters outside of higher ed), reformers sometimes seem more - focused on their own preferred version of choice instead of on the more - important goal of expanding opportunities for families to provide our children with high -
quality teaching and comprehensive college - preparatory curricula.
This law creates a rigorous and accountable process to ensure that
only the highest
quality charter schools will be authorized.
Slowing the growth of
charter schools won't solve the problems, though; it will
only trap students in failing
schools by taking away viable, affordable options for high -
quality education.
By focusing
only on the problems in
charter schools, the series misses the bigger picture in Detroit: a lack of
quality across both district and
charter schools, turf battles rather than leadership and problem - solving, and splintered government oversight.
But this can
only happen with
quality implementation of California's new science standards across all the state's districts,
schools and
charter schools — for the benefit of all of California's students.
And then there are
charter schools that are a welcome breath of fresh air to parents who, perhaps like me not too long ago, can
only afford to live in neighborhoods where the traditional
schools in that community are not of the highest
quality, but desire a high level of education, nonetheless, for their children.
Based on model legislation developed out of best practices from around the country, this law creates a rigorous and accountable process to ensure that
only the highest
quality charter schools will be authorized.
That means not
only supporting the growth of high - performing
schools, but also shining a light on those
charter public
schools that are not providing a high -
quality education.
A final element that should cause concern about cyber
charter schools is that not
only do massive cyber
schools fail to provide effective services found in
quality local public
schools, but they also cripple efforts of local public
schools to improve.
That means not
only supporting the growth of high - performing
schools, but also shining a light on those
charter schools that are not providing a high -
quality education,» Wallace said.
Well, for example, when Catalyst asked how Chicago Public
Schools justifies $ 76 million in increased funding to charter schools despite their lackluster performance and the district's enormous deficit, spokeswoman Becky Carroll said that «our job is to not only help build high - quality schools, but expand the number of choices.
Schools justifies $ 76 million in increased funding to
charter schools despite their lackluster performance and the district's enormous deficit, spokeswoman Becky Carroll said that «our job is to not only help build high - quality schools, but expand the number of choices.
schools despite their lackluster performance and the district's enormous deficit, spokeswoman Becky Carroll said that «our job is to not
only help build high -
quality schools, but expand the number of choices.
schools, but expand the number of choices.»
This bill is called the Empowering Parents Through
Quality Charter Schools bill, but we believe that it only serves to empower charter school operators and not parents or st
Charter Schools bill, but we believe that it
only serves to empower
charter school operators and not parents or st
charter school operators and not parents or students.
The new public
charter school regulations being discussed in Trenton today will not
only expand high
quality educational options for our students and families, but will allow public
charter schools to continue to innovate and positively transform our education system to the benefit of all students.
INCS Action, Illinois»
only statewide advocacy organization focused on improving access to
quality charter public
schools for Illinois families, marked its third election cycle in 2016 with new victories.
Not
only does this arrangement translate to high costs and poor
quality of services for many
charter schools, it also prevents
charter schools from delivering special education services that align with the innovation and educational philosophies that are unique to their
school.
WHEREAS, the NAACP recognizes that at best,
quality charter schools serve
only a small percentage of children of color and disadvantaged students for whom the NAACP advocates relative to said population left behind in failing
schools; and
It's time to spread the intelligence to their Congressional counterparts, who recently held a hearing on a new proposal, HR 10, the «Success and Opportunity through
Quality Charter Schools Act» with testimony from charter supporter
Charter Schools Act» with testimony from
charter supporter
charter supporters
only.
Only district and
charter schools can deliver on the promise of
quality school choice with both transparency and accountability in the use of public dollars.
said, «We are incredibly disappointed in the Board's decision, as it will
only hurt real kids who are longing for the type of high -
quality education
charter schools can provide.
This report explores the radical agenda of the Walton family and the foundation it controls, and how that agenda has taken the U.S.
charter school movement away from education
quality in favor of a strategy focused
only on growth.
Northeast
Charter Schools Network Connecticut State Director Yam Menon said, «We are incredibly disappointed in the Board's decision, as it will only hurt real kids who are longing for the type of high - quality education charter schools can p
Charter Schools Network Connecticut State Director Yam Menon said, «We are incredibly disappointed in the Board's decision, as it will only hurt real kids who are longing for the type of high - quality education charter schools can p
Schools Network Connecticut State Director Yam Menon said, «We are incredibly disappointed in the Board's decision, as it will
only hurt real kids who are longing for the type of high -
quality education
charter schools can p
charter schools can p
schools can provide.