Sentences with phrase «only question at this point»

«A colder winter may result in inflationary pressure and higher interest rates, given the tight worldwide energy supplies - the only question at this point is how much price inflation the economy can absorb.»

Not exact matches

Not only did he score just 11 points, including none in the fourth quarter, but things got worse after the game when he had a confrontation with a fan and took a shot at a Cleveland radio host for only asking questions after the Cavs lose.

At one point in 2005, criticism from the community that Mozilla managers were being too secretive led Baker to hold a moratorium on all corporate - only meetings for several months; it only ended when managers needed to discuss a human resources question too personal to share with everyone.

This leaves only one question — with the growing use of autonomous cars, at what point will we trust voice AI to take driving instructions?

«But at this point it's no longer a bet in terms of financial investment — the only question is how much more efficient we can make it.»

The economic fundamentals are highly supportive of this thesis, at this point it's only a question of whether or not the monkeys at the Fed are losing their ability to rig the markets.

The only question is whether a particular society has enough of the faithful to care for its poor so as not to have the charitable vocation usurped by the state, at which point it is no longer a Christian society.

New research from Gallup shows that, with only 44 percent of Americans having «a great deal» or «quite a lot» of confidence in religious institutions, Americans» trust in church is at its lowest point since the national research organization started asking the question in 1973.

While I can not myself question Julie based on my knowledge, I think it is fair to at least point out that there is legal documentation and testimony to support that Julie's side is not the only side of the story.

One might well question, at this point, the validity of nonreligious interpretation, asking whether Bonhoeffer has given us any example of non-religious interpretation rather than speaking only of its importance.

The issues of chief difficulty arise at the point of questions as to whether Jesus expected the Kingdom to come on earth or only in some realm beyond earthly history, and in the latter event, whether he expected earthly history to end very soon by a catastrophic divine intervention when he himself would return in glory to reign over a transfigured world.

For the moments we are weak, we can rely on his strenght; at the points where we seem to be giving up, he, in his fears and questioning, clung to his only thruth: I am the beloved son of God, on me his favour rests.

But at this point it is sufficient only to point out that in the chapter of I Corinthians 15 itself, Paul actually discusses the nature of the general resurrection and attempts to answer the question, «With what kind of body do they come?»

This speaking of God may ultimately only point to the question which is man himself and thus hint at God's mystery in silence, the result may be less adequate than any statement on another subject, the answer, aimed at God's bright «heaven», may ever again fall back into the dark sphere of man or may consist in inexorably upholding the question that transcends any definition, formula or phenomenon.

This only happens occasionally in the book but prevents the reader sharing in the deeper revelation and love of God that is occurring at that point in salvation history, especially in light of the New Testament, and raises the question that if the person in Scripture who is experiencing this unique relationship with God didn't really understand God, then how can we?

I need only to ask: if you wash your feet before prayer, and when the last stoning was that you attended: to get my point across... but you did say I had to answer in a coherent manner...:) Yes, the jesus story... one of those that many love to argue about, even me at times in my life have i taken the position of «he never existed»... but most of us know he did, the only real question is his divinity.

Any genuine struggle for justice could only begin at the point where such limits are called into question and where the rights of one are seen also as being valid for the other.

There's a lot of mystery there, and again, considering any «god» only adds more questions that aren't necessary to consider at this point with the evidence we have now.

Only question is, as I only have one pot to bake it in so one loaf at at time, at what point during this recipe can I freeze the dough and store it and many mOnly question is, as I only have one pot to bake it in so one loaf at at time, at what point during this recipe can I freeze the dough and store it and many monly have one pot to bake it in so one loaf at at time, at what point during this recipe can I freeze the dough and store it and many more?

Good question — and I'm not sure at this point since I've only made paleo cookies that turn out chewy.

At this point posing the question AGAIN is not only redundant, it is also stupid.

The only question I have at this point is why in the hell can't this kid get more than a couple of carries each game?

Only people who point the finger at Wenger without question are the idiots who read the daily rags and believe them to be gospel.

Hamilton was replying to a question asking if he'd caught up or talked to Rosberg at some point since his retirement bombshell at the end of 2016, saying that's the only time they have.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

why did we play Welbeck in the striker's role... no one can question his heart but to have a player with such limited first - touch and finishing skills against such a game opponent with Lacazette on the bench is almost unforgivable... maybe it's because Welbeck tows the party line or maybe it's because Welbeck doesn't know anything but 100 % on the pitch, unfortunately neither of these qualities makes him a capable starting striker on a team with any real aspirations... I can only hope that he was being showcased for a move elsewhere, as there was some talk last week about some interest from Everton... if he moved on that would be the only silver lining of this coach's decision, but once again it wouldn't excuse this club for putting business decisions ahead of fielding the best possible team to secure 3 points at Anfield

For me the only question is whether OG can continue to score at the rate he has this year — frankly I have my doubts because I am naturally pessimistic — but if he can than then I fail to see the point in taking a punt to replace him with a big name that will come with big money and a big risk.

winning to Man City is seen by some as a prowess and the resurgence of WENGERS glory days, well I don't see it that way, some see it as an outstanding victory first because we were not beaten merciless and then we scratched a win to a Man City that btw is not at it's best... we had an awful game yesterday, yes we got the points but unconvincing to say the least... WENGER is willing to change!!!!!!??? YES only when pressure mounted and for the first time his job was questioned, why did not happen before, we all know that the stubborn deluded man would have change nothing on his own accord if it wasn't because he was against the ropes....

An audience member pointed out in a question - and - answer session that Trump has flirted with running for public office before — most notably president in 2012 — only to back out, Paladino shot back at him.

At this point, the only question is whether or not Senator Gillibrand exceeds Schumer's record margin of victory in 2004.

He is good at deflecting any questions on how he's going to do it, to the point of insulting other people for not understanding it and pointing them to his party programme, which is only one page and doesn't say anything about it.

Looking at the rest of YouGov's monthly figures, on the Best Prime Minister question, where Michael Howard has now been replaced by David Cameron and David Davis, Tony Blair has only a 6 point lead over David Cameron, compared to a 21 point lead over Michael Howard in the last Blair / Howard / Kennedy poll and an 11 point lead over Howard at the election.

Questions that were directed only at Democrats have a margin of error of plus or minus 4.4 percentage points.

Only a third (31 per cent) of the patients questioned said that they were advised to do physical activity at any point during their treatment.

But from an email conversation with Francis, Vavrus, and several other atmospheric scientists this week, it became clear that there may be more questions than answers at this point, given the large amount of natural variability that affects winter weather patterns, and the very short observational record of how the atmosphere responded to extreme losses of sea ice (only five winters of records since 2007).

The group questioned the motive of the new research pointing to the deceptive research, and it also defended its clandestine efforts by reaffirming findings over the last several decades that concluded sugar does not contribute to heart disease — a point that's only half - true, considering sugar contributes greatly to obesity, which can put one at a higher risk of developing heart disease.

I will be reading all of them (up to the point, at least, that they degenerate into arguments between two or three particularly vociferous and contentious individuals), but I will be responding only to those that raise particularly interesting questions or issues, or point out any bone - head mistakes I may have made that need to be fixed.

You can always brush off any questions with, «Oh, I'm just so hot at this point in my pregnancy, this seemed like the only thing I could handle.»

When I questioned him about his lack of personal photos, only pics of his home and cars, he pointed me to his profile, which says, «I would hope that a woman (any woman) would pay attention to what I «wrote» in my profile, more so than just judge by looking at pictures.

It's at this point that regret and guilt rise up, and the only question remaining is whether this elderly man can overcome his repressed emotions and self - centeredness in order to make the best of what time he has left.

Cartel Land is an eye - opening look into a violent world that still menaces today, and also poses a provocative question: At what point does fighting fire with fire become the only option?

Meanwhile MARVEL has a raccoon character, a tree character, female characters left and right and the only question really in front of them at this point is what's next?

Who knows, but we can only guess that with the reception of «The Bourne Legacy» still a question mark, and Matt Damon's returning to the series an even bigger guessing game at this point, it's probably nice to have something franchise ready in reserve to continue pursuing a path that has served them well thus far.

John Hawkes, «Winter's Bone» With Jennifer Lawrence's deserved Best Actress nomination looking all but a sure thing at this point, the question remains whether voters who are only now popping in their screeners will notice the rock - solid band of character actors bolstering her work.

As I pointed out at the time, the NPPC report ignored how much money was going into each of the plans, and they looked only at the retirement benefits offered to 35 - year veterans, which sidestepped the question of how benefits accumulate over time.

Some experts have questioned that timeline, given that the IPO also notes that the company has only a driveable prototype built at this point, not a production - intent car, and has not selected its suppliers yet.

Well, it only really applies if the book in question is part of a series, at which point you may wish to include Chapter 1 of the next book, just to get the reader hooked so they will go and buy it immediately.

The Authors in question are Colleen Hoover (Slammed at # 8, Point of Retreat at # 18), R.L. Mathewson (Playing for Keeps at # 16), Lyla Sinclair (Training Tessa at # 17) and Bella Andre (If You Were Mine at # 22, Can't Help Falling in Love at # 23, and I Only Have Eyes for You at # 24).

That is the real question, and at this point the only advantage I see iPhone as having over Android.

There is no need to discuss price at this point as the «haggling» is only possible IF the questions are answered to your satisfaction.