Sentences with phrase «only real deniers»

and, btw, as far as «deniers» are concerned, the only real deniers are those who speak of «sustainable» growth, which is an oxymoron.

Not exact matches

Where those who push «intelligent design» go wrong is they distort or deny real physical evidence to promote the notion that the earth is only 5000 years old and the world we see is as it was initially created.

The only real difference then are those who have chosen to recognize God has already released us (everyone) from the bonds of sin, and those who choose to deny it.

Had Judas been confronted with the challenge «Deny the Messiah or die» only a few weeks earlier, while still hoping Jesus was the real messiah, he would probably have been the first Christian martyr.

One seemed to deny the Creator by divinizing matter and the forces of nature, and the other appeared to deny the Creator and the goodness of creation by insisting that only mind and spirit are good and real.

The so - called theological - political problem only exists when we politicize theology or deny the relative but quite real autonomy of political life.

The only reason you ever gave is one of altruism that gays should not be denied marriage so what is the real reason,, we know you are not altruistic.

The health and wealth Gospel is a travesty of the real Gospel, precisely because it not only denies the value of suffering and the call of Christ to take up one's cross and follow him, it also tries to manipulate God to give us «the desires of our hearts», whether they are good for us or not.

In other words, the only way to make becoming less than being is to deny that there is any real becoming.

«There is real and genuine tolerance only when a man is firmly and absolutely convinced of a truth, or of what he holds to be a truth, and when he at the same time recognizes the right of those who deny this truth to exist, and to contradict him, and to speak their own mind, not because they are free from truth but because they seek truth in their own way, and because he respects in them human nature and human dignity and those very resources and living springs of the intellect and of conscience which make them potentially capable of attaining the truth he loves, if someday they happen to see it.

For years they've purposely acted as if they are the only «real» Christians and denied the faith of every one of us non-fundamentalist Christians in this country.

Deny it all you want but since Fabregas left Arsenal our frre flowing football has really declined.It feels like am the only one who thinks we lack real penetration and ideas in the final third of opponents.Also in 14/15 sesson I lost count of our misplaced passes and poor gameplay overall.We've been very very poor in our passing game for some seasons now.For a game like this to work you need players whonhold the ball very well and are possession efficient.Look at the Arsenal starting lineup and compare it to that of years back and you'll know what I mean.We have very few possession efficient players which is causing this problem.We don't have many players who can actually hold the ball and play the ball.That's what differentiates us from the top passing teams.

When Real Madrid splashed a massive # 80m on the forward, Ronaldo became the world's most expensive player and has since written his name into history, picking up three FIFA Ballon D'or awards with only Lionel Messi denying him a full handful.

This time, the fall - guys were Juventus who were not given a chance but took Real Madrid to the brink, only to be denied by conceding a highly contentious injury - time penalty which led to their legendary goalkeeper Gianluca Buffon being sent off.

My fellow Real Madrid fans, only the ones who have spent their lives denying Messi's greatness; are you saying an average player has scored so many goals against your team?

What I dislike: - nasty conversations at first; - people seeking only for sex instead of a real conexion; — disrespectful words or actions; — denying food to me haha.

Bloggers who checked the leaked data alleged that there were only 12 thousand real women among 5.5 million female profiles listed, the claim that Ashley Madison denied.

It is disheartening to think this can be tolerated in a country that claims to value the first amendment... For those young people from solid families who are not allowed to hear differing opinions, or read about people different from themselves, their closeted viewpoints of the world not only deny them compassion, but also skewed visions of what's real.

Publicly Martin tended to deny a direct connection with other minimalists, possibly because she was older or because she had taken exception to the dogmatism of Donald Judd, a highly vocal sculptor who argued that painting was a doomed «illusionist» enterprise that could never satisfy the minimalist prescription to generate only «specific objects» in «real space».

Deniers constantly say things like this and yet I myself never see any real evidence of it... and I myself don't live only in the sealed off echo chamber of the denial blog world.]

Since this blog has given considerable space to the discussions of the global warming deniers (who have no real basis in serious academic literature), it would only seem fair to review this book by Speth in the NY Times, and then have a discussion of it on this blog.

My only real beef is that, while they are satirizing conspiracy theorists and global warming deniers, they probably reinforce the myths more than dispel them.

Away from the debate that only exists in Mann et al's heads — of one side representing the proposition «climate change is real», and the other side denying it — it seems that there is a widespread view that planet has warmed, slightly.

This is not to deny the very real risks of rising pCO2 in the atmosphere, of which «greenhouse» - induced «global warming» is only one, and IMO not the potentially worst.

Not only does it provide vast amounts of information about the real threat of climate change but it also, with good humour and rigorous logic, exposes the inaccuracy of those who would deny climate change.»

For example, Carlsson - Kanyama and Hörnsten Friberg (2012) found only 30 % of politicians and directors from 63 Swedish municipalities believed humans contribute to global warming; 61 % of respondents were uncertain about the causes of warming, and as much as 9 % denied it was real.

Only a REAL reality denier, would deny the reality of planetary geologic changes to claim that a trace gas, whose concentration is temperature dependent, is instead driving temperature.

Not only have those denying the reality of human - caused global warming lost all credibility but the fallback position of «it's real but it's too costly to do anything about it» has also collapsed.

But the true climate change deniers first had their way, doing what is unforgiveable (or even fraudulent) in real science, by retrospectively changing old data until it served their ends, by portraying the Earth as a place of Gaian perfection with only modest diversions from the supposed «average» temperature.

Gavin's «scince community» which by denying the real conflicts in data and interpretation excludes dissenting scientists will only increase its confirmation bias induced by its consensus.

My conclusion is that in general the only thing sillier than denying the real difficulties in a given technological development, is the a priori assumption that those difficulties can't be overcome.

Firstly, the Supreme Court in Mentuck held that once information has entered the public domain of the courtroom, access to disseminate this information should be denied only where its publication would present a real and substantial risk to the proper administration of justice (e.g. a risk to the accused's section 11 (d) Charter right to a fair trial), and where the salutary effects of denying access outweigh the deleterious effects.

But the company denied influencers like Mplatco official ways to monetize, provided weak analytics on viewers, ignored their requests, refused help with account lock - outs and only started verifying their accounts like real celebrities in August.

Denying the very real struggles in your day - to - day life have any influence on your wellbeing is only useful if your plan is to exist in a constant state of discomfort and dissatisfaction for the rest of your life.