The only real sense of danger is when carrying an egg out of a nest, as you will lose it if defeated at that moment.
Superman's return is
the only real sense of growth throughout this movie.
Uhm — So — So I would — It was never a sense of betrayal as
the only real sense of — of betrayal is was the fact that they — that they really didn't teach any of these other therapies in medical school.
Not exact matches
Expensive oil made
sense only because of the longest period ever of high oil prices in
real dollars from late 2010 until mid-2014.
Aside from special situations, it really
only makes
sense to be buying when there is
real blood in the street.
Well... the goal is to move money from cash to equity / lending to help fund business even riskier enterprises... This goal is being accomplished... wait for money moving into UK stocks and raising market... This makes
sense from preserving capital from inflation — stock market is the
only (except gold)
real way to fight coming inflation.
Your first sentence is the
only one that makes
real sense.
They talk about their families because that is what really matters in a person's life... that is thier true legacy and their
only real immortality... most people, I am fairly sure, know deep down that god is a fairy tale, a cushion, and that death is truly the end... what this very excellent young woman heard from these dying people makes perfect
sense... death is a time to end the bs and look at and reflect upon what was
real and important in that individual's life
She will have to visit cities both large and small, speaking
only to «
real Americans», dispensing her sage advice and folksy, homespun common
sense solutions.
By this he meant that the human brain, along with its
senses, and with is learned cultural bias, and even with the extension our scientific instruments gives us, has
only made a rough map in our minds of the
REAL world (the territory).
Ron Paul represent the
only and
real change in America, he is olso the
only candidate who makes
sense and say the truth to American people.
You cant debate God... you cant use logic to explain God... You cant use your small finite mind to try and explain away an infinite God... Man is flesh and blood but man has a spirit and some things can
only be received and revealed thru spirit... And what you do nt see is actually more
real than what you can observe with your five
senses... And BTW I did nt say religion i said God... Religion is man made tradition... God is
real... develop a personal relationship with the one who created you and gave you life... God has a purpose for your life...
When this is done, no argument is needed against the
real presence of a past figure, for a past figure by definition is not the present subjectivity, is not contemporary, and is precisely one no longer subject to being presented through the
senses.7 The presence of a past figure can be made intelligible and justified
only by a quite different notion of presence specifically appropriate to the relation of the past to the present.
The assumption is that
only what is somewhere now, is given; that is, that
only what is present in the three
senses considered above is
real.
To read the gospel with an open mind is to see beyond all possibility of doubt that Jesus came to bring us new truths concerning our destiny: not
only a new life superior to that we are conscious of, but also in a very
real sense a new physical power of acting upon our temporal world.
When I realize that the particular conclusions generated by the serious reflection that arises from such assumptions have
only the authority of those assumptions, then I feel free to turn to another philosophy that includes among its data human persons and their interactions; for my perception of reality is such that these seem to me at least as
real and ultimate as
sense data and mechanical relations.
It is possible not
only in a theoretical
sense and not
only for a few, but it presents itself as a
real chooseable possibility to many people who could never see the radical response as a live option.
Even if
only a few actually do speak, the possibility that anyone might address everyone produces a powerful
sense of artificial closeness, and consequently a desire for
real closeness and for the overcoming of spatial divisions and distances between people.
If we allow Blake's apocalyptic vision to stand witness to a radical Christian faith, there are at least seven points from within this perspective at which we can discern the uniqueness of Christianity: (1) a realization of the centrality of the fall and of the totality of fallenness throughout the cosmos; (2) the fall in this
sense can not be known as a negative or finally illusory reality, for it is a process or movement that is absolutely
real while yet being paradoxically identical with the process of redemption; and this because (3) faith, in its Christian expression, must finally know the cosmos as a kenotic and historical process of the Godhead's becoming incarnate in the concrete contingency of time and space; (4) insofar as this kenotic process becomes consummated in death, Christianity must celebrate death as the path to regeneration; (5) so likewise the ultimate salvation that will be effected by the triumph of the Kingdom of God can take place
only through a final cosmic reversal; (6) nevertheless, the future Eschaton that is promised by Christianity is not a repetition of the primordial beginning, but is a new and final paradise in which God will have become all in all; and (7) faith, in this apocalyptic
sense, knows that God's Kingdom is already dawning, that it is present in the words and person of Jesus, and that
only Jesus is the «Universal Humanity,» the final coming together of God and man.
But both the course and the result of this interpretation presented to the reader will still be
only the opinion of the interpreter for which he will once more be held accountable by the book itself in an ideal, though certainly not in a
real sense.
In a very
real sense, Brightman's metaphysics has been reduced to his epistemology49 which he then, ignoring Hume's skeptical warnings, tries to extend out into the metaphysical world — building a bridge over the river of doubt with an abutment on
only one side.
Scripture not
only portended current events but in a very
real sense brought them into existence.
According to Whitehead,
only that which is subjectively
real can act in the
sense of self - creation, and
only that which is self - creative is fully actual.
3:26 - 29); (b) within this equality the man (or at least the husband) is irreversibly «the head» of the woman (or at least his wife), i.e., is of higher rank in some
real sense (though the exact
sense is disputed - causal priority
only?
The directness of the relationship is established not
only through the mediation of the
senses, e.g. the concrete meeting of
real living persons, but also through the mediation of the «word,» i.e. the mediation of those technical means and those fields of symbolic communication, such as language, music, art, and ritual, which enable men ever again to enter into relation with that which is over against them.
It is an interpretation that is intended to make
sense of and give
sense to the persisting fact that Jesus is not
only a figure of the past but in some profoundly
real way a present factor in the experience of the human race.
This sort of despair is seldom seen in the world, such figures generally are met with
only in the works of poets, that is to say, of
real poets, who always lend their characters this «demoniac» ideality (taking this word in the purely Greek
sense).
Congratulations to Mr. Lefkowitz and Mr. Kobilka for doing something that, in the
only real part of that that makes
sense to the common person, «will help scientists come up with better drugs.»
Two movies that did quite well this year are Heaven Is For
Real and God's Not Dead, both of which are biblical
only in the
sense that the protagonists hold the Bible in high esteem.
Tommy God has already forgiven you for your sin the moment you asked Jesus into your life and confessed him as Lord.From that point he paid for your sin in full past present future.It is not sin that stops us from being with the Lord so you are saved.The problem you are experiencing is the battle for your life in the here and now satan is out to destroy you and he knows our weaknesses.If you are honest there were already issues in your life that you struggled with and never got the victory over.So where do you go from here as i found myself in the same situation i was a christian but walking according to the flesh.God does nt change his mind he always loves us but because of our choices we distance ourselves from God.The issue is that we like sin thats our wicked hearts and to be fair we cant change our nature
only Christ can do that our old nature must be crucified with Christ.The stumbling block is our pride we have to admit that we cant do it For me that was terribly difficult i was so independent thinking i could do anything but the truth was a made a
real mess of things.I
sense you are at a crossroads and are feeling desperate and confused.So as a brother in the Lord you need to confess your sin to God and tell him that you are weak -LCB- we all are -RCB- and that you cant do it in your strength -LCB- None of us can -RCB- but ask him to send the holy spirit to help you deal with the temptations and the sin that you struggle with and he will help you to change your life he will empower you as he did me.Rather than look at who you are look to Christ and walk in him and he will make you a new man and sin will not have dominion over you.Jesus came to set us free from bondage.Having once been a slave to sin i know what it is like to have been set free by the power of God and that is what Christ is offering you today.All it takes is a desire to change or repent and admit we cant do it and trust him to give you the strength to walk in him regards brentnz
But this is far different from saying that our modern common
sense has adopted wholesale the view that
only the material world is
real.
Such a statement reflects not
only Kristol's
sense of humor but also the balance he sought between skepticism and hope: skepticism about the perfectibility of human nature, hope that it can sometimes be improved in
real but incremental ways.
For if the data of experience consisted
only of universals, then the experiencing subject would have to infer the existence of other individual actual entities, just as Descartes claimed to infer the existence of a
real man in the street from the
sense - data present to his eyes.
About 60 per cent are members of churches, but though
only God knows how many of these are
real Christians, it seems certain that Christian character in any thoroughgoing
sense is a much greater rarity.
We agree it is
real, but shy away from «literal,» because «spiritual death»
only makes
sense because we understand actual physical «death.»
When D. E. Nineham comes to the words of the centurion in his commentary, he notes, «In a very
real sense this verse rounds off not
only the crucifixion narrative but the whole Gospel.»
That Jesus was aware with every breath he drew of the eternal kingship of God everyone will agree; that he believed men could come even now in some
real sense and measure under the righteous and loving rule of God is almost equally clear; and
only by the most tortuous methods of interpreting the Gospels can one escape the conclusion that Jesus expected the kingdom of God as a future supernatural order.
And just as thankfully he is, apparently,
only a pastor in his own mind and not in any
real - life
sense.
It is probably true to say that this is a relationship which
only begins to make
real sense, rather than just theoretical
sense, after the consecration itself.
And an increasing
sense of being involved with the formation of a new generation, at the heart of the Church in the early years of a new century: «Today the FAITH Movement is at a new stage — and perhaps its
real work is
only just beginning.»
Trying to fit what felt like a tidal wave of calling into that tiny box of limitations brought
real confusion and pain, which not
only affected my
sense of calling, but also my whole
sense of self and of God.
The question of revelation is a formidable question in the proper
sense of the word, not
only because it may be seen as the first and last question for faith, but also because it has been obscured by so many false debates that the recovery of a
real question in itself constitutes an enormous task.
Physical death, therefore, is
only an incident, so lacking in determinative power that, in a deep
sense, it is no longer
real: «Verily, verily, I say unto you, If a man keep my word, he shall never see death.»
Only union through love and in love (using the word «love» in its widest and most
real sense of «mutual internal affinity»), because it brings individuals together, not superficially and tangentially but center to center, can physically possess the property of not merely differentiating but also personalizing the elements which comprise it.
It threw me suddenly into a condition above and without thought, unstained by any mental or vital movement; there was no ego, no
real world —
only when one looked through the immobile
senses, something perceived or bore upon its sheer silence a world of empty forms, materialized shadows without true substance.
Perceiving the present world as
only so much continual change, without
sensing any of this change as applying or connected to oneself, would perhaps be to perceive the present world as less
real, more of a passing show of forms or shadows.
If his humanity has to be admitted, these misguided devotees want him to be Son of Man in no
real sense, or else Son of Man
only in the
sense of a perfect human being.
Moreover, Hartshorne affirms that he does not contradict himself when he asserts the additional twin theses that every concrete entity is a subject (or has objects of knowledge) and that every such entity must be an object for some (anyone will do) subject.31 Furthermore, he argues that
only the panpsychistic doctrine of an ocean of subjects internally related to their objects of knowledge can make
sense of our deeply ingrained conception of the world as a
real nexus of temporal succession of cause - effect relationships.
Looked at from the outside, it is certainly not visible as love in the
real sense of the word, but
only as a phenomenon of spiritual or psychic history which is open to various interpretations.
«Each time we met, every time we talked by telephone, we had a very
real sense that the idea was not
only catching on, but exploding.»