Sentences with phrase «only record some observations»

Not exact matches

Six models showed favourable effects on primary outcome measures (e.g., standardized measures of child development outcomes and reduction in behaviour problems).13 Only studies with outcomes using direct observation, direct assessment, or administrative records were included.

He not only spent a lifetime recording intricate observations of diseases at his patients» bedsides — earning him the title «father of clinical observation» of the 18th century — he also influenced generations that came after him.

Only 14 of the reports record a series of observations of the animals over time — most reports are single observations.

Unlike the satellite temperature record, where only a few satellites are measuring temperatures at any given point of time, there is a large amount of redundancy in surface temperature observations, with multiple

Since the MF is calm in only about 20 % of the daylight period, our findings might provide an explanation why many magnetoreception experiments were hardly replicable and why directional values of records in diverse observations are frequently compromised by scatter.

For the record, my name is only associated with one walkthrough and observation system — iObservation.»

The lab supplies our students with resources that are normally available only from a major publisher, including 10 group testing stations, a living room style lab with an observation booth for real - world evaluations, and real - time high definition recording and broadcasting equipment.

We only have direct observations of total solar irradiance (TSI) since the beginning of the satellite era and substantial evidence for variations in the level of solar activity (from cosmogenic isotopes or sunspot records) in the past.

Having said that, the record - number of landfalls was «only» 10 and the previous was six, which suggests that either the length of the (official) observations is very short or there so far has not been many record - breaking events.

I can only go by the observations and crop records rather than models, and whilst there was undoubtedly a cold period in the 1200's it then recovered for a very long period

Steve, unfortunately for this station the raw data ends in 1984, so it's a bit hard to say much about a difference in slope between raw and adjusted data from 1970 - 1984 (I would have to do a significance testing to see if you even have enough data records for any slope to be significant for only 15 years of observations).

Since recorded climate observations have only been for a very short period in the billion year history of climate on this Earth, I am bemused by both sides of the AGW debate claiming any discernable trend either way.

From all the observations (solar cycles, temperature record, proxies), it's very likely that we are not only at the ~ 60 - year cycle plateau, but also at the longer ~ 200 year cycle plateau (and possibly longer cycles as well).

Climate sensitivities estimated from recent observations will therefore be biased low in comparison with CO2 - only simulations owing to an accident of history: when the efficacies of the forcings in the recent historical record are properly taken into account, estimates of [Transient Climate Respons — TCR] and [Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity — ECS] must be revised upwards.

However, one's interpretation ought be of recorded observations made using so reliable scientific measure as available, not of the narratives only, or one is dealing strictly in speculation.

But might the assumption that the rest of the time the Gomez data reflects SSTs from further afield be more consistent with your observation, about similarities between the Gomez record and the ICOADS SST data, than if the Gomez record always reflected only local SSTs?

I'm afraid all my efforts to match recorded observations to them only seem close to matching the very coldest 1990 predictions and I'd love to see a graph that can more clearly show me where I'm going wrong.

The Sedlacek and Knutti paper is only about oceanic temperatures, not the land record, it shows that the models do a poor job matching observed oceanic changes over the 20th century when relying only on natural forcing, and that if the natural - only runs are scaled to have an overall trend that matches the observations, the models predict a more heterogeneous distribution of trends than was observed.

Second, orbital instrumental observations provide only a recent record of land surface area temperature assessment, and the methods involved had to be calibrated against the prevailing standards of proximal thermometric determination, the widely - ranged system of meteorological thermometers in these United States providing (as others here have observed) a sort of «gold standard» in terms of technology, maintenance, and reliability as compared with similar broadly spaced systems of monitoring stations.

Unfortunately, we are stuck with the historical temperature record, where there are only a handful of stations in the world that have remained at the exact same location with the exact same instrument and observation time with no major changes to micro - or meso - scale environments over the last 100 + years.

The task of digitising daily records is ongoing (Figure 1) with many daily observations only available in paper form.

Speaking to my comment only, I cited two good sources explaining in great detail that models are in fact carefully evaluated and, yes, validated, and that moreover they do have a solid record of successful predictions versus real - world observations.

Starting June 27, 2013, Ottawa Police Officers, by their observation only, began recording the race of the driver at all traffic (motor vehicle) stops.

Used properly, data obtained via methods including, but not limited to, third party references, historical records, interviews and direct observations should help assure that conclusions are reached only when there is data convergence.