Sentences with phrase «only reply to comments»

Also, I think it's really important to not only reply to comments, but to also leave thoughtful comments on other's blogs.

I can usually only reply to comments once every week or two...

Not exact matches

A couple of mildly cool features set the app apart from the crowd: the ability to narrate your videos with a voiceover after you record them and the ability to submit comments via reply video only.

I don't know if this was directed towards me, but since it was a reply to my comment, I can only imagine that it was.

You have written about this before, but I think it was only in reply to comments.

If A New Comment Is Posted: Do Not Send Email Notifications.Send Email Notification ONLY If Someone Replies To My Comment (s).

Do Not Send Email Notifications.Send Email Notification ONLY If Someone Replies To My Comment (s).

It's only day two of my blogging life but I can already see that if I hope to continue writing these posts and work on my own writing and occasionally feed my family or attempt to fold a piece of laundry, I can't also reply to individual comments on... [Continue reading]

(Please let me know your city by an email at [email protected], I know the certified lactation consultants head who can help me suggest one from your location, please do not reply to comment as its public, send me email only) I myself consulted lactation consultant 2 times for some other reasons.

Just to reply to your comment... (it's exactly what I said a few comments below): Please, don't take this personally, I am only explaining my point of view.

Do Not Send Email Notifications.Send Email Notification ONLY If Someone Replies To My Comment (s).

Aaaaand I just giggled like a little girl after seeing you had replied to my comment, you are such an inspiration and not only on the fashion front.

If A New Comment Is Posted: Do Not Send Email Notifications.Send Email Notification ONLY If Someone Replies To My Comment (s).

Opportunity of Creating a Profile · General Information > Name, Gender, Age, User Information, Country, Zip / Postal Code, Height > Additional information related to relationship status, physical information, smoking, drinking, occupation and religion > Looking for (multiple - choice and range of answers) > All essential parts of the profile are discussed above > Distance from > Greeting for Profile and Title > Essay That Explains More About yourself · Upload of 10 photos · Opportunity of Replying to Emails · Post of Comments on Forum and Profiles · Chat with Other Members · Verify of the Occupation, Age and Photos · Basic Searching · Photo Gallery · Profile Statistics The only issue about this membership is that it does not allow members of initiating communication between members.

For the free basic membership, members will be given access to the following: · Forums and blogs · Live chat rooms · Limited searches based on gender and age and limited search on location which is only within 100 miles · Add about ten photos in your profile · Limited contact other site members and can only post comments, send winks and reply on other member's profiles.

As it turned out, the petition wasn't exactly a success as it has only managed to reach 10 thousand signatures so far and Harada recently replied to a fan request demanding an update on his comment.

I'll ignore your blatant illiteracy for the time, as others have astutely pointed it out to you (ignored by you, of course, in favour of only commenting to Janet Evanovich, which spells out even more about your lack of character, but at the same time curious, since you later express blatant misogyny in a reply to some other not - so - important person).

p.s. Tim, is there any way to allow us to follow replies to only our own comments via email?

suggest only a tiny % of readers ever engage in dialogue, which is a shame... I find replying to emails / comments inevitably requires (some) reflection & fact checking — always rewarding!

Stephen, I have to reply to your comment only out of concern.

FLOUNDERS BLOG / RANT: In reply to your comment of «spiritual Minute», i can only say this: You are finally getting it.

I am way too new to have such problems, but rather than starting off on the wrong foot, I have a question — when you reply to comments left on your blog, do you reply only on your blog, or do you send an email as well.

That isn't the point as much as the only place where anyone can find this out are Bandai Namco commenting on Youtube videos or two importers replying to each other in the comments of an article supposed to explain what is on offer even if it is mostly character focused.

Appreciate you replying to only a few comments, Greg, and sending a clear message to to the people who complain just because their 6 favorite games in the world weren't given to them for free.

I just replied a similar comment regarding why I couldn't stand Spirit Tracks, however, I think what grinded my gears the most was how you spend most of your time sitting on a train going alllll the way across the map, only to reach some trivial «problem» that needed to be solved by turning around and going alllll the way back, getting an item, and then once again trekking back.

As it turned out, the petition wasn't exactly a success as it has only managed to reach 10 thousand signatures so far and Harada recently replied to a fan request demanding an update on his comment.

Gavin — sorry, only just noticed your reply to my comment.

As a case in point for (c), the least - squares fit of SAW+AGW to HadCRUT3 implicitly entails a fit to the Keeling curve with an R2 of 99.56 % (which incidentally is better than Goodman's «triple - exponential» fit which only achieves R2 = 98.98 %, which I'll comment on later this evening in a reply to Greg's long - neglected Jan. 2 comment).

Your failure ever to reply to comments made on this blog only confirms that you are not mentally equipped to defend your idiotic views, let alone pass them off as representative of anyone else's.

In fact, in a very contrite reply to a comment on their paper, they not only agreed with the commenter that his criticism was potentially valid but they pointed out that there were other even more important deficiencies in their model.

I posted on this thread https://climateaudit.org/2009/10/14/upside-side-down-mann-and-the-peerreviewedliterature/ that the only reasonable way to read Mann's reply to the PNAS comment is that he thinks there is no a priori physical understanding for Tiljander, and therefore either orientation is correct and no one - sided test was used.

Funny that you replied only to the comment which I already realized and acknowledged (next comment) was off - base.

When I underwent the ordeal of preparing and submitting a commment to GRL while they were still in the unannounced phase of their new policy, I actually offered to serve as the comment - and - reply editor for GRL if only they wouldn't forbid them.

But if he subsequently took time to read my material after replying to my comment at his article, then it's plausible he's not only realized that this grandiose dream has evaporated, but also that he's now facing the far more real and very bleak prospect of trying to guess who might turn state's evidence against him just to save their own skins in investigations of where the actual «racketeering» in the global warming issue seemingly appears.

So you reply only to the positive comment yet all the ones where you ripped customers off you don't even give the time of day?

Only six have updated their LinkedIn, while the seventh one has not replied to requests for comment.

If A New Comment Is Posted: Do Not Send Email Notifications.Send Email Notification ONLY If Someone Replies To My Comment (s).

If A New Comment Is Posted: Do Not Send Email Notifications.Send Email Notification ONLY If Someone Replies To My Comment (s).