Sentences with phrase «only respondent in the case»

She was the only respondent in the case and the law firm has not been accused of any improper behaviour.

Not exact matches

Ecklund said there were cases in which survey respondents identified that not only did they introduce their children to one church, but they also attended other religious services in the hope that the children would better understand each denomination.

In some cases, the responses suggested a lot of enthusiasm for notions that the questions only vaguely defined, leaving me foggy as to what respondents were endorsing.

While in may cases we have chosen to look only at principals, rather than including assistant or associate principals, in this case we chose to include all respondents (211), since there is no reason to assume that assistant or associate principals can or do receive fewer professional development resources, and our preliminary analysis suggested that there are no significant differences between the two groups.

In many cases, respondents in favour of massively widening access were «opposed to new selective schools in general, and said they would be supportive only if they were made available almost exclusively to lower income pupils», the report saiIn many cases, respondents in favour of massively widening access were «opposed to new selective schools in general, and said they would be supportive only if they were made available almost exclusively to lower income pupils», the report saiin favour of massively widening access were «opposed to new selective schools in general, and said they would be supportive only if they were made available almost exclusively to lower income pupils», the report saiin general, and said they would be supportive only if they were made available almost exclusively to lower income pupils», the report said.

In this case, 67 % of those who identified as immigrant respondents replied «credit» whereas only 55 % of first generation Canadians did.

Given the obvious inequality of arms between the SRA and respondents, it seems that the answer to any SRA concerns would be to ensure cases of alleged disciplinary breaches are investigated properly and only presented to the SDT by way of clearly formulated allegations where clear evidence exists rather than rely upon a reduction in the burden of proof.

If in this case, the appellants had, either in their notice or in the bills or otherwise, made clear that the amount claimed was only part of their claim to costs and that they would be claiming later in respect of the work of RJH; and the agreement was that the respondents would pay a sum in respect of the costs claimed, recognising that the costs in respect of RJH were still to be dealt with, the appellants would not be prevented from making a claim in respect of those costs.

In a 2012 survey of Alberta family law lawyers (PDF), the Canadian Research Institute for Law and the Family found that 40 % of its respondents never offer unbundled services, and that those who do work on such a basis did so in an average of only 12 % of their caseIn a 2012 survey of Alberta family law lawyers (PDF), the Canadian Research Institute for Law and the Family found that 40 % of its respondents never offer unbundled services, and that those who do work on such a basis did so in an average of only 12 % of their casein an average of only 12 % of their cases.

See Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308, 318 (1976)(holding that respondent's Fifth Amendment rights were not violated where he was advised that he was not required to testify but that his silence could be held against him); Lefkowitz v. Cunningham, 431 U.S. 801, 808 n. 5 (1977)(clarifying that Baxter permitted an adverse inference to be drawn in a civil case from a party's refusal to testify, but that the Baxter respondent's silence «was only one of a number of factors to be considered»).

Oh, and just in case you didn't check out the complaint, this ENTIRE EPISODE was only one of TWO separate counts that Respondent is currently before the ethics board for.

This was the only one of the six use cases examined for which a majority of respondents said that their legal departments were taking advantage of data analytics, although nearly a third also reported adoption in legal matter management / billing and information governance (IG).

Interestingly, although the law lords declined an invitation from the respondents to depart from Page as «unnecessary» on the facts of this case, the tenor of the speeches in Grieves can only encourage further confinement of Page to its facts and a challenge at a later date by defendants.

To establish this prima facie case would require the tribunal to consider not only evidence of a difference in status and treatment but also the reason for the differential treatment and evidence produced by the respondent contesting the complaint.

If the law required the applicants to establish only that Indigenous people occupied the land in question at sovereignty, State respondents would doubtless alter their practices, rewrite the guidelines, and in many cases make agreements for determinations of native title without delay and consequently with much reduced cost.

Because the analysis technique we used (see data analysis below) does not accept missing cases, we could only include respondents who played games in both waves (N = 547).

Respondents were asked to include GLA owned and managed through Dec. 31, 2002, and were instructed to report only retail GLA and only their percentage of ownership in the case of joint ventures.