Sentences with phrase «only responsible if»

DHT is only responsible if you are already genetically predisposed to lose you hair and it might make the process faster.

Not exact matches

If not, make one person responsible for the calendar — letting too many people edit the calendar will only muddle things up.

If America wants tax reform, the only responsible approach is to first reform what should come first, the unbridled growth in entitlements that makes slashing taxes that support that spending, on hopes the economy will boom, a dangerous shot in the dark.

Even if an employee was never told to drink as part of a client meeting, the employer could be held responsible if the employee states he only did so because he felt it was necessary to win the account.

«Further testing is required before Song's device could be approved as a treatment for dementia or Alzheimer's, but if it is able to help those patients regain even part of their lost memory function, the impact would be felt not only by the patients themselves, but their families and even the economy at large,» says Science Alert, which notes that Alzheimer's was responsible for a whopping $ 236 billion in healthcare costs last year.

If successful, Porter will not only give Air Canada a real run for its money, but it will be responsible for the fastest expansion of any form of mass transportation Toronto will see for years to come.

If an investor is leaning toward a positive decision, then the business plan only reinforces this feeling and was not responsible for making your case on its own.

Medical debt is somewhat more complex but, assuming you didn't receive Medicaid, your family would likely only be held responsible if:

Blame the machines if you'd like, but only you're responsible for how you respond to this.

Huge percent of Muslims want Sharia law (even if not the majority) Only 4 % believe Al Qaeda was responsible for 9/11 Here is a Guardian article stating that 1/2 of all Muslims feel homosexuality should be ILLEGAL (not just wrong, but punishable by force).

In fact, by failing to do so, you become a culprit by not probing their minds to make sure that whether they are aware of this biblical truth and hence being perished and away from that everlasting love for eternity — and for this very reason and negligence or misguidance, you will be responsible and accountable when you meet with your creator God of love whom he also loved you so much that if you were the only person living on the face of this earth and planet, still he would have come and died for you and the forgiveness of your since and loving you unconditional.

AE, there are only a few people actually opposed to having a relationship with an all - powerful, all - knowing, and perfectly benevolent immortal being responsible for the creation of our reality — if such a thing is possible, should such a being exist.

If we must seek those responsible, we had best turn to those who put him on the cross — the cross which could only break him.

«If you gave some solid reasons why this necromancy is false,» and «You're only responsible for giving logical reasons for your belief in Christ.»

The U.S. system of industry self - regulation is preferable to the English system, but a voluntary regulation system can survive only if its participants act in a responsible manner and abide by the rules they set for themselves.

If we were not responsible, God would not be just in giving eternal life only to a few and sending the rest away into eternal separation from Him.

We are responsible only for those acts and attitudes in which we are free enough to do or to think otherwise if we choose to.

Yet if there is a new vision of «pan-Orthodox and ecumenical unity» in the Eastern church, no one is more responsible for it than this man, whose desire for an open church is matched only by his love for American baseball.

This is not meant to advocate an integralism of piety according to which one is a good Christian only if all one's actions are reflected and integrated into theoretical norms; it does not mean that all realized freedom must be passed as it were through the filter of reflection in order to be responsible action.

If persons are viewed as individual substances responsible only for their acts, this is, of course, true.

If you want to say only the former, then: Christianity is responsible for the crusades, Salem witch trials, few other odds and ends.

In this latter case God is not necessarily responsible for the existence of evil; he would only be responsible if it were not finally overcome.

One can only be «responsible» if one is responsible to someone.

If evil transpires, this can only mean that the self is overpowered by an alien force, and reason can not be responsible for its own defeat.

If the atheist statement «there is no god» is re-phrased as «materialistic forces only are responsible for creation and the subsequent fuctioning of reality / the universe» then you in fact * do * have a lot of explaining to do.

If classical Darwinism isn't the explanation for macroevolution, however, there is only speculation as to what sort of alternative mechanisms might have been responsible.

They only wanted Jews to emigrate, and if any Jews did die it was the USSR that was ultimately responsible.

This is why a little child, even though self - centered by nature, is not a sinner, and sin is «original» only in the sense that the natural self - centeredness of childhood, if uncurbed, becomes sinful as the individual matures to the point of responsible decision.

God holds us responsible only for what we know or for what we would know if we cared.

If we reflect on this chain we can never point to one of its links and say with absolute certainty: this is due only to my free and responsible decision.

a communication which in terms of method is monologue (one speaker) may at the same time be governed by the principle of dialogue; and similarly, although two people may be addressing each other, if neither is responsible for or responsive to the meanings of the other, the communication is dialogue only in terms of method and lacks the dialogical principle.

And for an interesting look at the problem of categorizing the pill as an abortifacient, check out Libby Anne's piece on the topic, where she notes that «if your goal is to save «unborn babies,» and if you truly believe that a zygote — a fertilized egg — has the same value and worth as you or I — the only responsible thing to do is to put every sexually active woman on the pill,» because the pill actually reduces the number of zygotes naturally rejected by a woman's body.

If God never changes, then why did he say, in the same OT, that he visits the sins of the fathers to successive generations, then says each individual person is only responsible for his own sins?

If what follows smacks of heresy, we are the only ones responsible for the ideas expressed here...

If someone gets hurt on a bull, that's one of Satan's bulls, or God was punishing the rider for not being good even though only God is responsible for good and the rider can only choose bad because God is not responsible for bad and all that.

Since Humanae Vitae, the fiftieth anniversary of which we celebrate this year, there has been a constant stream of Jesuit moral theologians arguing in print that the encyclical was a mistake, that it is enough if the unitive and procreative dimensions of sex and marriage are linked in only a very general way — not in each marital act — and that the really deep meaning of Paul VI's teaching is that couples should exercise responsible parenthood.

Just want to share some valuable info (http://www.eastbayexpress.com/oakland/california-targets-wrong-water-wasters/Content?oid=4222724) since I'm writing from Los Angeles — almond crops are currently responsible for making the current extreme draught conditions even worse because they are such a water - intensive crop in an area that does not naturally have sufficient water supply, so please consider using other nuts and seeds instead, as CA is currently the only major source of almonds in the world (if you're able to find a small, local / non-CA supplier, wonderful!).

(Please note I have only tried this recipe in that machine so please don't hold me responsible if it doesn't work in yours!)

«Anheuser - Busch's operations and important to support our resources are focused on adding to life's enjoyment friends and, if possible, enhance the enjoyment of not only through the responsible consumption of beer their lives, which can take on by adults, but through theme park entertainment and many forms.»

Not only is milk fat responsible for that smooth, mouth - coating quality, but it provides the framework that holds each and every one of these cream products together; if whipped cream is a body, then fat is its skeleton.

The only man responsible for change at Arsenal is Kreonke but isn't a football fan he is busy counting cows at his ranch, if you give someone a contract to do a job and the job isn't done well who takes responsibility the one who give the contract to a particular person or the one who performed the contract?

Honestly, paulinho is a disgrace to a midfield that once boasted of xavi deco etc As for the others I don't think details are necessary, the bottom line is that for a board with a sporting director Barca made a huge mistake in allowing lucho sign such players (he wasn't responsible for paulinho but he gave them such ideas), from now on we should keep a group of world class players (like RM), coaches who Believe in our PHILOSOPHY only should come and use these players to give us our football back, valverde is not successful because of messi only, he is successful because the core of this team is a group of the most technically gifted and intelligent players in the world, the board knows this and so do RM, that's why we are chasing players like fdj, deligt, and even alaba, because once this core of la masia talent is gone we would be useless if there are no adequate replacements, this board must continue signing replacements for our core and for once!

Only an IDIOT will say Wenger is solely responsible for the transfers and he can get to spend all of his boss's money if he wants...

Why so much effort and so much money spent to enter the top 4 in every single year?Just to be embarrased everytime by anyone?I mean, is not worth it if you don't take advantage of that and go for the glory.Everything is on vain, just the pleasure of showing up?This team doesn't have a future, it is just a mediocre one, get use it.Glory times are past, class players are gone... what is left?Just a name chasing the shadows of the past.And all this sorrow atmosphere has only one man responsible - Arsene Wenger.He must go for the good of the club, he is just a stone dragging the team backward or keeping it still.Just go Arsena, don't embarras yourself and the beautiful times you lived here.

although KROENKE and his pet boy Gazidis are accomplices the only responsible of the poor showings ARSENAL repeats year after year is LE FRAUD we will win nothing this man is in charge... the performance of the team is solely WENGERS responsibility WENEGR OUT PERIOD follow him if you want

If we had signed a good striker that will boost the team confidence and spirit and you never know we might even got a good results in westham and Liverpool games, and the season is still long... If we had signed a good DM we could have a void this miserable moments wetting our pans while waiting to see how long Le Coq will be out... If only we have a responsible manager... and if only we have a responsible fans with big ambitions, not fans of 4th place epl and 16 - round knock out ucl.If we had signed a good striker that will boost the team confidence and spirit and you never know we might even got a good results in westham and Liverpool games, and the season is still long... If we had signed a good DM we could have a void this miserable moments wetting our pans while waiting to see how long Le Coq will be out... If only we have a responsible manager... and if only we have a responsible fans with big ambitions, not fans of 4th place epl and 16 - round knock out ucl.If we had signed a good DM we could have a void this miserable moments wetting our pans while waiting to see how long Le Coq will be out... If only we have a responsible manager... and if only we have a responsible fans with big ambitions, not fans of 4th place epl and 16 - round knock out ucl.If only we have a responsible manager... and if only we have a responsible fans with big ambitions, not fans of 4th place epl and 16 - round knock out ucl.if only we have a responsible fans with big ambitions, not fans of 4th place epl and 16 - round knock out ucl...

Clearly there was some kind of defensive failure but I can not determine who was responsible or if it was even only 1 player's fault — it is NOT automatically the fault of the LB because Wenger often sends the FBs forward as attackers.

The problem with Wenger is that he has not the killer instinct like coachs as ferguson or mourinho, they have this winning mentality who make them able to do anything in order to win, even cheating, wenger is just a tryer, he does not give it all in the fight.The team was obviously missing 2 centers backs and one strong DM, he did not address the problem, the striker issue was addressed only by luck, if Man U did not get falcao for any reason, there was no back up plan for any other striker, remember he was in Roma.I believe his age has something to do with that as he shows the stubborness of senile people.I don t see Arsenal as a force until he moves on somewhere else.the board too is responsible for not kwowing football and trusting him blindly even when he clearly fail his duties.

Arsene Wenger admitted that player power was responsible for the severe change of tactics against Manchester City but despite the success against the champions, Mertesacker says the proof the squad have learnt their lessons will only come if they keep winning matches.

If you create an account with us, you may only create and hold one account that you are solely responsible for managing.