Sentences with phrase «only rich men»

It's a two way search; not only rich men seek women there, but rich women can also seek men to fulfill their aspirations.

Only the rich men end up as members in these sites.

Millionaire dating sites have a specific format that they follow and they believe in approving only those rich men who can be considered to be millionaires.

Shaking off past hang - ups, women are now openly speaking out their craving for extravagant lifestyle; something that only a rich man can afford for her.

Not exact matches

But if Papa can pull it off, not only will he be a much, much richer man, but he'll earn a legendary reputation on Wall Street among Ackman and others who will wish they'd never doubted him in the first place.

Arkad, the richest man in Babylon, asks a very simple math question to his students: What would happen if, every day, you added 10 coins to your purse but only spent nine?

He became the richest man for the first time in July — but his reign only lasted a day.

Bezos may not only be the richest man in the world today — he might become the richest man ever, at least measured in pure dollars.

As a sole founder who had only raised $ 4.5 million from outside investors, Cerilli suddenly became a very rich man.

Obama described Buffett as «not only as one of the world's richest men but also one of the most admired and respected» who had «demonstrated that integrity isn't just a good trait, it is good for business.»

When he hits the mark, Bezos, who started selling books from his garage 22 years ago, becomes the first man to bump Gates from his perch in seven years and is only the sixth man to hold the «richest person» title in the past 30 years, according to Forbes.

The 50 - year - old former schoolteacher is China's richest man, trailing only Hong Kong property tycoon Li Ka - shing among Asian billionaires.

The wireless communications tycoon is already his country's richest man and only billionaire, but his latest business...

The funding is the largest the live streaming service has raised since it was founded two years ago by Wang Sicong, the only son of China's second - richest man Wang Jianlin.

I'll attack Romney's faith because Jesus himself said that not only is it harder for a rich man to get into heaven than to get a camel through the eye of a needle but that what you do to the least of us you do to Jesus.

This is a story of an anonymous rich man and of a poor man whom Jesus bothers to name, the only named person in all of Jesus» parables.

In addition to his advice to the young ruler, there was his clear injunction to store up treasure not on earth but only in heaven, his rather pointed remarks on the impossibility of dual service to both God and Mammon, his parable about the rich man and Lazarus (which was not, I think we can grant, merely a warning against dissipation), and so on.

My money is on the camel, and not only because I am fond of both camels and outlandish metaphors; but it is a very old question what Jesus really said had a better chance of passing through a needle's eye than a rich man had of entering God's Kingdom.

First, according to Father Maillard (referred to above), the rich man is not our brother, he is our enemy; eliminating him is the only thing that matters.

(Luke 2:41:51; 4:16 - 30; Acts 7:54 - 60; 27:9 - 44) A glance at some of the parables found only in Luke shows how deeply we are indebted to him for words of Jesus that go to the heart of human relations — the Good Samaritan, the Prodigal Son, the Pharisee and the Publican, the Rich Man and Lazarus.

God, transcendent and immanent, above all yet in all; God, forthgoing in the sublime and challenging character of Christ; God, no abstract essence only, but the Spirit who can strengthen us with might in the inner man, so that, as Paul dared say, we «may be filled with all the fullness of God» — if one is going to believe in God at all, what richer, more comprehensive, and sustaining idea and experience of him can one imagine than that?

The rich man was respected and admired, and it was only when he was definitely caught in an unlawful act that he was suspected.

And, oh, when the hour - glass has run out, the hourglass of time, when the noise of worldliness is silenced, and the restless or the ineffectual busyness comes to an end, when everything is still about thee as it is in eternity — whether thou wast man or woman, rich or poor, dependent or independent, fortunate or unfortunate, whether thou didst bear the splendor of the crown in a lofty station, or didst bear only the labor and heat of the day in an inconspicuous lot; whether thy name shall be remembered as long as the world stands (and so was remembered as long as the world stood), or without a name thou didst cohere as nameless with the countless multitude; whether the glory which surrounded thee surpassed all human description, or the judgment passed upon thee was the most severe and dishonoring human judgement can pass — eternity asks of thee and of every individual among these million millions only one question, whether thou hast lived in despair or not, whether thou wast in despair in such a way that thou didst not know thou wast in despair, or in such a way that thou didst hiddenly carry this sickness in thine inward parts as thy gnawing secret, carry it under thy heart as the fruit of a sinful love, or in such a way that thou, a horror to others, didst rave in despair.

The sutra is inexhaustibly rich with deep and fine similes which express this anxious love.10 The wisdom of the Tathagata is so high, his knowledge is so deep, that to the man who is blind, erring, and engrossed in the world it must seem to be absolutely incomprehensible.11 However — and what Mahayana shows to us is the highest reconciliation between God and man — this compassionate love turns to each man with the appropriate means and in unique ways in order to show him that he too has within himself the potential not only of ending his own suffering but also of one day being himself transformed from one saved to a savior, a Tathagata.

Nathan told him a story about a rich man who had lots of sheep who took the only lamb of a poor man.

Solovyev characterized the spiritual climate in Europe in the following way: «The only essential difference and inequality between people still existing in the West is the inequality of a rich man and a worker; the only grandeur, the supreme power, still having there the real force, is the grandeur and power of capital» (FNCZ 63).

Jesus asked of the rich man not only «sell and give» but also «come, follow.»

For that, too, the condition of being the richest man, is only something «to a certain degree.»

The parables disclose with what pleasure and tolerance he surveyed the broad scene of human activity: the merchant seeking pearls; the farmer sowing his fields; the real - estate man trying to buy a piece of land in which he had secret reason to believe a treasure lay buried; the dishonest secretary, who had been given notice, making friends against the evil day among his employer's debtors by reducing their obligations; the five young women sleeping with lamps burning while the bridegroom tarried and unable to attend the marriage because their sisters who had had foresight enough to bring additional oil refused to lend them any; the rich man whose guests for dinner all made excuses; the man comfortably in bed with his children who gets up at midnight to help his importunate neighbor only because he despairs of getting rid of him otherwise; the king who is out to capture a city; the man who built his house upon the sand and lost it in the first storm of wind and rain; the queer employer who pays all of his men the same wage whether they have worked the whole day or a single hour; the great lord who going to a distant land entrusts his property to his three servants and judges them by the success of their investments when he returns; the shepherd whose sheep falls into a ditch; the woman with ten pieces of silver who, losing one, lights the candle and sweeps diligently till she finds it, and makes the finding of it the occasion of a celebration in which all of her neighbors are invited to share — and how long such a list might be!

There is only the continuing relationship of man with the eternal Reality of God, opening richer vistas here and there, descending to horrible depths at this point and at that, yet moving forward spirally, as it were, until in Christ — so the Christian believes — the relationship is established on a new level of depth and profundity, as well as of height and penetration.

Intimacy reaches full flower for a couple only when they have found in, through, and beyond their marriage, a rich measure of those gifts which the great religions of the world have made available to men.

I think maybe the only place Jesus talks about hell is with the parable of Lazarus and the Rich Man (which is likely a parable), and when Jesus says that hell was made for the devil and his angels (Matt 25:41), and sadly, some people end up there as well.

No, Jesus only said that it was easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man (like, say, the Koch brothers) to enter the kingdom of heaven.

These features characterize not only the later Nazoraean belief and practice, but also the earliest traditions preserved in the Gospel of Mark — for example the words to the rich man, and the narrative of the Transfiguration.

But Abram said to the king of Sodom, «I have raised my hand to the Lord, God Most High, the Possessor of heaven and earth, that I will take nothing, from a thread to a sandal strap, and that I will not take anything that is yours, lest you should say, «I have made Abram rich,» except only what the young men have eaten, and the portion of the men who went with me: Aner, Eshcol, and Mamre; let them take their portion.»

There is only one passage in the gospel record in which a rich man is declared deserving of hell - fire simply because he is rich, and a poor man simply because he is poor is found worthy to be carried by the angels to Abraham's bosom — the story of the rich man and Lazarus.

The rich man had to explain to them that this was only temporary while he could build a larger structure to accommodate more people.

Only the poor man has a rich God.

They are pictures, symbols, because it is only by such that we, who are men, could understand; and they are necessary, too, because they speak imaginatively, not prosaically, and call forth our own rich imaginative response.

But he experienced the fact, only too often, that possessions come between a man and God; to these men of wealth his words apply: «Woe to you, for you have received your consolation» (Luke 6:24); and so does his hard saying, not to be softened by anything in the figure employed, «It is easier for a camel to go through a needle's eye than for a rich man to enter the Kingdom of God» (Mark 10:25).

He not only snubbed Denver, the franchise that plucked him from Miami in the second round of the 2011 draft, but he also brushed off a handful of other teams that were prepared to make the 27 - year - old an even richer man.

A miracle of research, Magnificent Failure reveals in layer after layer of rich detail an era in which men put themselves in peril armed only with will, tenacity and self - caressing lunacy.

The only reason why Man City and Chelsea have won the league recently and been doing slightly better than Arsenal, is because they have super rich owners who have pumped bottomless pits of money into their clubs.

The other part of your post regarding Usmanov selling his shares could come true, if he feels there is no point in hanging around if he thinks there is no chance of him getting on the Board of Directors at Arsenal or take overall control, the only reason he will stick around is because he is a fan of the club, not just a very rich man trying to squeeze very penny from the club to prop up his other franchises.

With 11 courses serving communities whose populations total only 30,000 permanent residents, the desert enterprisers have truly done more than any other spot in the country to bring what was once a rich man's game to Everyman.

my problem with AW is that for years he resisted to buy good players because of a million or two difference from asking price today's market those players are worth triple, we could of had a great team with possibly wining the EPL twice and possibly semis or final of CL, if he had just spent the money in the bank, Chelsea are in dept around 850 Million pounds (possible the bulk to Abromovich) and same for Man - United and few more, we are the only club that is cash rich with funds available around hidden 350 million and more accumulating every season, how i know this because i look at their end of year accounts outgoings and income there is around 100 to 120 million less outgoings then income, we can easily spend 700 Million in the summer and we will be well in with FFP rules and only have 350m to pay in two years which we can with bigger and higher sponsorship coming any day now

The thing that really bothers me is the thing we've disagreed on in the past and that's imo Wengers apparent lack of Urgency and decisiveness when moving into the transfer window I know that Scheweinsteiger would be a great addition but He is somewhat over the hill in comparison to the others that are being toted about and while I know that we are not the cash Rich Man Poo or Man Sh!tty or Chelski I do know that we are at a point for the first time in ten years where we don't need to replace many players or are being frced to sell the quality ones we have, we are for the first time in a spot where we only need to add two or three players and we are there in terms of being able to compete, Id hate for the financial Exuberance to stop us taking that final stride forward into the competitive team we nearly are IMO spend the money now, get the striker, get the DM and we wont need to look at transfers in a big way again for several seasons and with that in mind Id rather have the likes of Benzema or Lacazetta or even Cavanni than a nearly over the hill Scheweinsteiger.

wow NYG and DNZ so as supposed fans of one of the richest and well supported club in the world, you are happy to only win FA cups and achieve a constant 4th place when shit clubs like Chelsea and Man City get success.

How many men would love to be rich, single and ownersof not only a profitable NBA franchise but also the hottest casino in Vegas?Joe, 51, and Gavin, 50, are the president and vice chairman, respectively, ofthe Maloof Companies, a billion - dollar family business that grew from a generalstore in northern New Mexico into a beer distributorship and then expanded intohotels, banking and entertainment.

3) Stan has made it perfectly clear that he is only keen on his own personal rewards from the club 4) Usmanov is richer than Stan and Abramovich and is prepared to spend the money the team needs to succeed 5) Man U are in far more debts than Arsenal but are still far richer, why?