Sentences with phrase «only rise in value»

From the top to bottom and bumper to bumper one of the nicest examples of this classically designed Buick & a certified milestone car that will only rise in value and collectors desires for a safe investment.

So presumably, the less wealthy, after being told what to spend their money on by «society» for all their working years, reach pensionable age fully moulded by a paternalistic government into financially responsible citizens who will commit a significant amount of their time to research where they want to invest their pensions, and subsequently enjoy «regular updates on how their pension fund was growing» — because of course, like house prices, pension funds can only rise in value.

This creates the appearance that housing is an asset that can only rise in value, and even more pile in.

Not exact matches

The aggregated value of cash only takeovers so far in 2018 has risen by 33 percent year - on - year while the value of deals using cash and stock has risen by 221 percent, as companies look to exploit their buoyant share valuations.

Only at one company did pay rise substantially without a commensurate rise in shareholder value, and several companies showed phenomenal growth in value with no change in CEO compensation.

Some market watchers buy that line, noting the two firms have used only about a quarter of the US$ 400 billion put at their disposal after Washington seized them in September 2008 due to losses from rising home foreclosures and falling home values.

«I would point out only that if you look at the rise in the Dow for example, some 20 % or so is just from the rise of Goldman Sachs» (GS) value and that if you look at financials broadly they account for something like a third of that increase.

Even if it only rises to 10 %, or 1 % of that, you can see why Bitcoin has a LOT of room to grow in value, and if you believe in its future, even $ 30 per bitcoin is very cheap.

The Indian Internet market, which was valued at only $ 11 billion in 2013, could rise to $ 137 billion by 2020, according to a recent Morgan Stanley Research report, «The Next India: Internet — Opening Up New Opportunities» (Feb 2, 2015), with the potential to drive economic growth, creating new markets and industries that have been maxed out in other regions.

Not only were valuations getting pretty close to fair value on the Rule of 20 scale (19.2 in 04» 10, 18.7 in 04 ’11 and 17.3 in 03» 12, the latter admittedly more reasonable), but economic momentum stalled, leading to a soft patch and rising investor concerns, aggravated by political chaos in Europe and the U.S.

The value of retail sales rose only modestly in the first two months of the year, following exceptionally fast growth at the end of 2003.

China's domestic stock markets doubled in value in the space of less than a year only to fall by 30 % during three weeks in late June through early July, before rising sharply again after central bank intervention.

These single - premium fixed products have been around decades, but they only had ho - hum sales — that is, until a rising number of advisors, financial media and older consumers began to see value of including income annuities in retirement portfolios.

If stocks are richly valued both in the U.S. and abroad, the situation can only be compounded by the fact that interest rates are rising everywhere.

Finally, the value of deductions rises with marginal tax rates, which are higher for those with higher incomes: someone in the bottom tax bracket only gets a 10 - cent subsidy for $ 1 of deductions while someone in the top bracket gets 39.6 cents.

We noted in that January 3, 2018 newsletter, Grantham warned value investors that during a melt - up — where prices not only rise but rise at an accelerating rate, «prudent preparation for a downturn will take a psychological toll and make you feel awful, because the average client is going to lose patience».

He adds himself to the world as the vision of ideal possibility, from which every new occasion takes its rise, thereby ensuring a measure of order and value in a situation that could otherwise be only chaotic and indeed could achieve no actuality at all.

If an aver - age household today produces more than twice as much labor in hours as an average household did 25 years ago, and receives only a fraction more in real income, then obviously the value of labor has fallen — even while the productivity of labor in the same period has risen sharply.

Before abandoning fundamental values and institutions, we must pause and take stock of our present social order: millions of drug abusers; rampant child abuse; a rising underclass without marketable job skills; children roaming the streets; children with only one parent or no parent at all; and children growing up with no one to guide them in developing any set of values.

The only way I can see change is if Kroenke decides to cash in on his shares, which are rising in value daily, with the club now being valued at # 2 billion.

My work is also directed toward determining why plants exposed to elevated carbon dioxide concentrations often have only a temporary increase in growth rate, and toward determining what plant characteristics might be most beneficial to the productivity and to the nutritional value of crops if atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations continue to rise.

In the end, Archibald concludes that the warming from the next 40 ppm of CO2 rise (never mind the rest of it) will only be 0.04 degrees C. Archibald's low - ball estimate of climate change comes not from the modtran model my server ran for him, but from his own low - ball value of the climate sensitivity.

One recent study examining the Palaeocene — Eocene Thermal Maximum (about 55 million years ago), during which the planet warmed 5 - 9 °C, found that «At accepted values for the climate sensitivity to a doubling of the atmospheric CO2 concentration, this rise in CO2 can explain only between 1 and 3.5 °C of the warming inferred from proxy records» (Zeebe 2009).

In Rossen's world, the only victories are won at the expense of those who believe in you, the creeds you've embraced, and the values you've gathered as fortification against the rising tide of entropy and chaoIn Rossen's world, the only victories are won at the expense of those who believe in you, the creeds you've embraced, and the values you've gathered as fortification against the rising tide of entropy and chaoin you, the creeds you've embraced, and the values you've gathered as fortification against the rising tide of entropy and chaos.

It is indeed a wonderful time to see the rise of indie authors not only triumph the bestselling charts, but it is also a valued opportunity to see how they share information in order to craft an open market for creative individuals to express their story and identity uniquely.

The result was not only a dramatic dip in the value of the average home, but individuals all over the country losing their job as the economy began to slow down and a number of families who found themselves underwater when it came to their mortgage steadily on the rise.

This is still only a fraction of home equity lending that occurred in 2006, but rising home values are putting more equity in borrowers» bottom lines.

This not only allows you to benefit from rising values and be protected against market downturns, but by allocating your savings among different classes, you can substantially reduce the worry that comes with investing in only one type of asset.

Not only are financing costs rising, home values are rising too, in March notching a startling 10.9 % gain compared to a year ago and a 1.1 % bump compared to February.

In the past, as interest rates were dropping and home values were rising rapidly, interest - only ARMs worked well for some people — especially those who didn't plan to stay in the home beyond the length of the loan's first terIn the past, as interest rates were dropping and home values were rising rapidly, interest - only ARMs worked well for some people — especially those who didn't plan to stay in the home beyond the length of the loan's first terin the home beyond the length of the loan's first term.

Reason # 2: Youâ $ ™ re going to build equity anyway is true only in the event that you're taking out a loan that amortizes over the life of the loan, and if the value of your home rises over time.

As population increases, property values rise, and high rental prices drive people from their apartments and into homes, the real estate market will only rise in San Diego and other California cities.

Regarding watchlist assets that have risen in value, I follow portfolio rule eight, and only buy assets that would be a net improvement to the portfolio.

For example, if a stock rises 10 % on say, New York, but also rises a further 5 % for Canadian investors due to an increase in the U.S. dollar, a holder of a hedged ETF would only see a 10 % rise in the value of that holding in their hedged ETF.

At the same time, the reverse is also true: If a stock rises 10 % on New York, but falls 5 % for Canadian investors due to a decrease in the U.S. dollar, a holder of a hedged ETF would still only see a 10 % rise in the value of that holding as part of their hedged ETF.

-- We've only finally seen a tentative stabilisation / rise in values this year.

Whether it's a high - rise hotel located smack - dab in the middle of a bustling downtown city or a secluded residence hidden in a rainforest, converting the roof of a building to a livable area adds value not only to the space but to one's personal experience as well.

I keep all of my old games, really (I've only ever sold two back to GameStop and they were complete Nintendo Wii shovelware junk that I am confident will never be worth anything to anyone ever), so it's only natural that a few would rise in value.

In market terms, it seems likely if only because the rise in values has been so extremIn market terms, it seems likely if only because the rise in values has been so extremin values has been so extreme.

A text that is almost entirely, rather than only momentarily, diagnostic in orientation is Barbara Rose's excellent, and unfortunately little remembered, «The Value of Didactic Art» of 1967, which ambitiously lays out the terms of a particular shift where works of art — those inheritors of the precedent of Duchamp's unassisted readymade — began to derive their value and significance from visually presenting a particular argument, rather than by engaging the viewer in primarily aesthetic terms, which this didactic art rendered at best marginal or incideValue of Didactic Art» of 1967, which ambitiously lays out the terms of a particular shift where works of art — those inheritors of the precedent of Duchamp's unassisted readymade — began to derive their value and significance from visually presenting a particular argument, rather than by engaging the viewer in primarily aesthetic terms, which this didactic art rendered at best marginal or incidevalue and significance from visually presenting a particular argument, rather than by engaging the viewer in primarily aesthetic terms, which this didactic art rendered at best marginal or incidental.

Our modelled values are consistent with current rates of Antarctic ice loss and sea - level rise, and imply that accelerated mass loss from marine - based portions of Antarctic ice sheets may ensue when an increase in global mean air temperature of only 1.4 - 2.0 deg.

Contrast it with this story in the Washington Times if you want an example of really bad reporting: http://www.washtimes.com/national/20060420-115953-7360r.htm [Although you got to love a line like «The Duke estimates show the chances that the planet's temperature will rise even by 11 degrees is only 5 percent...» for the humor value.

The land - only «amplification» factor was actually close to 0.95 (+ / -0.07, 95 % uncertainty in an individual simulation arising from fitting a linear trend), implying that you should be expecting that land surface temperatures to rise (slightly) faster than the satellite values.

The initial picture presented by Marvel et al (founded on incorrect Fi value for CO2) was that the WMGHG results were basically in line with CO2 - only response, and the historical run was a low outlier — giving rise to the paper's argument that observation - derived TCR values would be biased low because of this «accident of history».

Wile EPS and XPS go up in a linear fashion, (ex; EPS is R4 for 1 ″ and R8 for 2 ″, etc...) polyiso R Values do not (ex; ISO is R6 for 1 ″ and R13.1 for 2 ″ and continues rising - going up to R31 for 4.5 ″) I would only advise that you check with the specific manufacturer.

Obviously they use only a few carefully selected values from the older literature, invariably choosing results that are consistent with the hypothesis of an induced rise of CO2 in air caused by the burning of fossil fuel.

«In parts of New York City and elsewhere, homeowners are dealing with flooded basements, salt - poisoned yards and falling property values, not only because of catastrophic storms, but because tides, aided by sea level rise, now cause flooding where they live.»

The only value of this alignment as it relates to Marcott et al is that the two simply can be shown to rise and fall relatively in tandem, indicating they're picking up relatively the same climate elements.

Assuming the IPCC's value for climate sensitivity (i.e. disregarding the recent scientific literature) and completely stopping all carbon dioxide emissions in the U.S. between now and the year 2050 and keeping them at zero, will only reduce the amount of global warming by just over a tenth of a degree (out of a total projected rise of 2.619 °C between 2010 and 2100).

In fact the Mauna Loa or global CO2 rise is much faster than linear... the differences between the mauna loa / global are negligible for the purpose of radiative transfer, and the difference in average CO2 concentration between an «average global» data - set and the Mauna Loa record since 1980 (for monthly values) is only 0.65 ppm (and with a correlation coefficient r greater than 0.99) indicating that the Mauna Loa record is representative of global - scale CO2 concentration as you'd expect with a well - mixed gaIn fact the Mauna Loa or global CO2 rise is much faster than linear... the differences between the mauna loa / global are negligible for the purpose of radiative transfer, and the difference in average CO2 concentration between an «average global» data - set and the Mauna Loa record since 1980 (for monthly values) is only 0.65 ppm (and with a correlation coefficient r greater than 0.99) indicating that the Mauna Loa record is representative of global - scale CO2 concentration as you'd expect with a well - mixed gain average CO2 concentration between an «average global» data - set and the Mauna Loa record since 1980 (for monthly values) is only 0.65 ppm (and with a correlation coefficient r greater than 0.99) indicating that the Mauna Loa record is representative of global - scale CO2 concentration as you'd expect with a well - mixed gas.