Not exact matches
According to the American Bar Association, the general
rule that employers should
follow is that they may
only be allowed to record the activities of the employees if they are in plain view.
Among others, the
rule only allows for temporary residency — initially for a period up to two years,
followed by a period of three years if rapid growth and job creation milestones are met.
To avoid these time - wasting gatherings and ensure that his schedule is
only filled with meetings that are worth his time, Bezos
follows a very strict
rule of thumb.
But the WHO and other global health responders can
only follow rules No. 1, 2, and 3, if they have ample funding and active support from the rest of the world.
The answer is we can't, this is why the people who founded the United States used the Bible to base the
rules that they would
follow as an absolute with regard to morality... it's
only as society has begun to drift from these standards that we are getting worse...
If your Christians there are
only one set of
rules you should
follow with an additional one that is the laws and
rules spelled out in the 10 Commandments written by God in Gods language and presented to Mosses on Mt Sinai.
Adam wasn't required to know what was good or bad he was
only required to
follow the
rules.
If you really want to
follow jesus and not the
rules that Paul set up as christianity, become a jew for jesus, they're probably the
only real christ followers outt here.
So why are you
following a book that constantly contridicts itself???????????? 10 Commandments and the Golden
Rule are the
only rules we should be
following to faith and dump the bible fro it is
only meant to control the population and not deliver its followers into heaven.
He doesn't say that you can
only love him if you
follow a ton or
rules.
@Chuckles» If you really want to
follow jesus and not the
rules that Paul set up as christianity, become a jew for jesus, they're probably the
only real christ followers outt here.»
Orthodox Jews
only follow rules set in the Torah (the Old Testimony).
It is
only a matter of time before these «good christians» decide to make people
follow their stupid made up
rules at gunpoint.
you applying your «
rule» to
only a few doesn't qualify as
following your
rule.
Fairy tales have always taught us a certain truth, that life has a set of
rules that we didn't set up, and we will
only be happy if we
follow them (another big point of Chesterton's).
The
only safe
rule to
follow is this — all suicidal threats must be taken seriously.
What should shock and shame every Christian is that
only 47 % of white evangelicals believe we should
follow the golden
rule.
Only 53 % of those surveyed say the United States should
follow the golden
rule and not use any methods on our enemies that we would not want used on our soldiers.
Believers singlehandedly can reduce the number of abortions in the USA by 700,000 each year, if they
only followed their own cult's
rules, no changes in any law required.
Still, the case against teleological ethics may here offer this response: Granting the difference between direct and indirect applications, this yields
only the familiar distinction between «act - teleology» and «
rule - teleology, «3 is problematic for the
following reason: Social practices or patterns of social cooperation can not be validated teleologically without a comparative assessment of the good and evil consequences differing possible systems of
rules or norms (for instance, differing sets of rights) are likely, if adopted, to produce.
Religious
rules and laws
only apply to those that
follow that religion.
The
rule of law, then, does not mean that the people should
follow only the established codes, remaining respectfully obedient to them and never criticizing or changing them.
It
follows that our
only way of understanding the
rule is nonsense (MG 111).
Now, after Ronald Reagan rewrote the
rules of political debate, it's backwards: the Democrats find themselves promising to
follow Republican market initiatives,
only with more heart and less human cost.
The government
followed the court's
ruling by noting a few hours later that the judgment applied
only to the Catholic paper in question.
The corner stone of ALL religions is also the
ONLY religious principle that I was taught in the «business ethics» class I took in college... Put simply, if everyone did their very best to
follow the «the golden
rule» (i.e. due unto others as you would have them do unto you) in everything they do, WE WOULD HAVE A BETTER SOCIETY TODAY EVEN WITHOUT ORGANIZED RELIGION OF ANY KIND.
The LDS church besides being based on absolute fantasy matched
only by scientology (and
followed closely by christianity and Islam) is
ruled by old white men who
only begrudgingly gave up polygamy and blood atonement.
Is fundamentalist Christianity the
only religion that gets to
follow its
rules and teachings?
Again, why the posts about all turbans needing to be checked, seems to me that Sikhs have been
following TSA
rules and can refuse to take the turban off and still be allowed to board the plane if no reasonable security threat is detected since it is
only a reccomendation.
Any
rule, based in any religion,
only applies to those that
follow that particular religion.
The succession of son
following father upon the throne, broken
only for the interval of Athaliah's usurpation, is related in the colorless terms that he «
ruled in his stead»; whatever may have been Judah's ritual counterpart of «The king is dead; long live the king,» information is generally lacking.
By staying and
following manmade
rules and regulations, you are
only seeking to please men, rather than God.
It seems that far too often it's hypocritical Christians that are
only preaching the Golden
Rule and it's the nonbelievers that
follow it.
In the period between the two World Wars, a Scottish Home
rule movement was established and in 1934 the Scottish National Party was born, but it was
only in the last thirty years that the appetite for political autonomy grew to the point where a devolved Parliament was created in 1998 and met for the first time the
following year.
RESOURCES Bloomberg, Obama Lead Over Romney Similar to 2008 Margin Over McCain Life of Julia DNC Video: «The Government Is The
Only Thing We All Belong To» Berkley Center, Contraception and Conscience: A Symposium on Religious Liberty, Women's Health, and the HHS
Rule on Provision of Birth Control Coverage for Employees (See, for example, the question posed during Panel 3, at 1:25:40) The American Catholic, 98 % of Catholic Women Use Birth Control Become a fan of First Things on Facebook, subscribe to First Things via RSS, and
follow First Things on Twitter.
And the Chronicler, who sees
only the glories of Solomon's
rule, informs us that Uzziah's greatness was the reward of faithfulness to Yahweh (v. 5) Be that as it may, at least two Yahweh prophets, Isaiah and Micah, look out upon the life of Judah in the decades
following Uzziah's reign with bitter reproach and with condemnations that must fall, in part, upon Uzziah.
«The golden
rule» should be the
only rule any person needs to
follow if you ask me.
Do you mean to say that simple
rules like «Don't steal — coz you won't like it if it happens to you», «Don't kill — coz you won't like it if it happens to you», can
only be
followed if there is fear of religion and repercussions after death?
if they do nt
follow the
rules of burial it will cause turmoil on muslims, creating even more hatred, do nt just say something about burning because its forbidden for us, even the most dangerous living has his own proper burial, now because of this is just like telling no show no respect to other religion, why did your bible thought you that or it wasn, t mention in it, why you really thinks this do you think you are the
only people in this world
If
ONLY my fellow more radical atheists would
follow such
rules.
Those who claim to be Christian strive to
follow the model he gave (one of total non-violence) and his teachings which incude love for neighbor and, more importantly, help other to put their hope — not in man's various pitiful efforts to
rule themselves, all which have fallen way too short (since man was not created to
rule man)-- but rather in God's Kingdom... the
only true panacea to ANY and ALL of today's worldwide problems.
================== @Chuckles «Listen, I understand that from a believer, it's easy to do the mental gymnastics for god to say «we
follow the
rules because he made them and we
follow him because he made us» so you don't have to try and explain the WHY of it,
only that he said so and thats good enough, but I could never understand why I would
follow a
rule if I didn't see any reason» @Chad «Here is the reason: And for your lifeblood I will surely demand an accounting.
A «cameo essay» explains the reasons for this decision roughly as
follows: the gospels contain sayings proclaiming God's
rule as both present and future; Jesus could not have said both things; the future eschatology appears «bombastic and threatening»; therefore, Jesus must have spoken of God's
rule only as present reality.
When Jesus went back to heaven after the Resurrection He said that there were
only 2
rules to
follow... «Love God and love your neighbor.»
A hundred people will probably be yelling at me for this one, but the fact is that most people who identify themselves as any form of Christian or Catholic, even so - called devout ones,
follow only the
rules they like.
«
Following the commandments of God» recalls not
only the Ten Commandments but also the Golden
Rule.
Jesus did not do away with any of those things just as He did not do away with the LAw —
only that we should
follow Him becasue of belief and love not becasue of some written
rule to fear.
Anyone looking at real science and
following real
rules of logic can
only reach agnostic, not theist or atheist.
Not
only does Vermes ignore Thomas, but in contrast with the Jesus Seminar's passion for methodological rigor, ad mits that «methodology... makes me see red, perhaps be cause more than once I have been rebuked by trans - At lantic dogmatists for illegitimately arriving at the right con clusion
following a path not sanctioned by my critics» sa cred
rule book.»
I can see
only one emergency
following upon another as wave
follows upon wave;
only one great fact, with respect to which, since it is unique, there can be no generalizations;
only one safe
rule for the historian: that he should recognize in the development of human destinies the play of the contingent and the unforeseen.»